• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2015

Purpose: Despite the high success rates of endosseous dental implants, their placement is restricted according to the height and volume of bone available. The use of short or mini dental implants could be one way to overcome this limitation. Thus, this study aimed to compare standard, short, and mini dental implants with regard to associated clinical parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) levels of cathepsin-K (CTSK), RANK ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG), after prosthodontic loading. Methods: A total of 78 non-submerged implants (Euroteknika, $Aesthetica^{+2}$, Sallanches, France) were installed in 30 subjects (13 male, 17 female; range, 26-62 years) who visited the clinic of the Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University. Sampling and measurements were performed on the loading date (baseline) and 2, 14, and 90 days after loading. Assessment of the peri-implant status for the implant sites was performed using the pocket probing depth (PPD), modified plaque index, modified gingival index, modified sulcular bleeding index, and radiographic signs of bone loss. PICF samples collected from each implant were evaluated for CTSK, RANKL, and OPG levels using the ELISA method. Keratinized tissue and marginal bone loss (MBL) were also noted. Results: Clinical parameters statistically significantly increased in each group but did not show statistical differences between groups without PPD. Although implant groups showed a higher MBL in the upper jaw, only the standard dental group demonstrated a statistically significant difference. At 90 days, the OPG:sRANKL ratio and total amounts of CTSK for each group did not differ from baseline. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, both short and mini dental implants were achieving the same outcomes as the standard dental implants in the early period after loading.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제48권8호
• /
• pp.615-620
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The short dental implant is considered as possible solution in the alveolar bone height deficient cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical availability of short implants by measuring the marginal bone loss of short length implants and comparing with that of conventional length implants. Materials and Methods: The groups were composed of patients who had received at least one implant. The samples of this study were selected from patients who with functional loading after prosthetic treatment for 1 year follow up period. The implants with a length of 5.7 mm and 6mm were considered short. (Bicon Dental implants, USA). The experiment group was composed of $4.5{\times}6mm$, $5{\times}6mm$, $6{\times}5.7mm$ implants (total 18 implants were placed in 14 patients, 8 on maxilla, 10 on mandible). The control group was composed of $4.5{\times}8mm$, $5{\times}8mm$, $4.5{\times}11mm$, $5{\times}11mm$. All implants were selected only by implants placed on molar area. We evaluated marginal bone loss in radiographic images at baseline (implant loading) and 3, 6, 12 months after loading. Additionally, crown-to-implant ratio was evaluated, and marginal bone loss according to crown-to-implant ratio after functional loading was analyzed. Results: The short implant group had a mean marginal bone level of $-0.52{\pm}0.69mm$; the 8mm group, $-0.22{\pm}0.82mm$; and the II mm group, $-0.10{\pm}1.09mm$ after I year of functional loading. But significant differences were not detected between three groups at every follow-up period. Crown-to-implant ratio in short implant group was $1.55{\pm}0.23$; 8mm group was $1.15{\pm}0.18$; and 11mm group was $0.92{\pm}0.15$. Additionally, significant differences between three groups were founded. (P<.0001) The greatest marginal bone loss after 1 year follow-up was founded at crown-to-implant ratio 1~1.49 range in short implant. Conclusion: The marginal bone loss of short implants was comparable to that of long implants. So, the short implants can be a clinically acceptable option.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제54권9호
• /
• pp.692-702
• /
• 2016

A short dental implant is considered as possible solution in difficult clinical situations for the placement of a regular length implant. Using a short implant avoiding more invasive surgical procedures simplifies the treatment plan and shortenes the duration of treatment. In this case, 71-year-old female came up with discomfort from her old mandibular denture. As she had fully edentulous mandible and got a negative feedback from removable denture, implant-supported fixed prosthesis was planned. Six short implants were placed on her mandible with severe alveolar bone loss. After 1 year follow up period, implants were well retained with any other abnormal findings. The patient was satisfied with her prostheses and satisfactory outcomes were attained in terms of both esthetic and functional clinical results.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.457-462
• /
• 2009

연구목적: 임플란트의 생존율에 영향을 미치는 요소들에 따른 구체적인 생존율을 살펴보고 짧은 임플란트의 사용도 예후성있는 치료인지에 관해 평가하는 것이다. 연구방법: MEDLINE (PubMed)을 통하여 검색된 논문에서 임플란트의 길이, 직경, 식립 위치, 표면 처리, 상부 구조와 관련된 정보를 추출하여 각 요인별 생존율을 비교 분석하였다. 임플란트의 길이와 직경의 생존율과 구간별 생존율 비교를 위해 카이 제곱 독립성 검정을 이용하였으며 임플란트의 식립 위치나 표면처리, 상부 구조 디자인 간의 생존율 비교를 위해서 Window용 SPSS 프로그램을 이용한 일원배치 분산 분석을 이용하였다. 결과 및 결론: 짧은 임플란트 (8.5 mm 이하)의 생존율은 95.87% 였으며 이는 여러 문헌에 보고된 표준적인 길이 (10-12 mm)를 가진 임플란트의 생존율과 유사하였다. 그 중에서도 길이 6-7 mm 짧은 임플란트의 생존율이 길이 7.5-12 mm 임플란트의 생존율보다 더 낮았다 (P<.05). 한편, 직경 4 mm미만, 4-5 mm, 그리고 5 mm이상의 3집단으로 나누어 생존율 비교시 4 mm 미만 집단에서 낮은 생존율을 보였으며 길이 6-7 mm의 짧은 임플란트의 경우 5-6 mm 직경의 임플란트를 식립했을 때의 생존율은 97.01%, 3.1-4.8 mm 직경일 때의 생존율 92.96%로 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. Machined surface와 표면 처리된 짧은 임플란트의 생존율 비교시 표면 처리된 경우가 약 6.3% 정도 높은 생존율을 보였으며 보철 수복시 인접 임플란트와 연결한 경우 (99.4%)가 단일 임플란트 치관으로 수복한 경우 (94.3%)보다 높은 생존율을 보였다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.172-179
• /
• 2021

Purpose. This intra-patient retrospective study of up to 10 years evaluated the clinical success and risk factors of 6- and 8-mm long implants and their respective prostheses. Materials and Methods. The sample consisted of patients treated at a Military Polyclinic dental service, who received both 6- and 8-mm long tissue level implants in the posterior region of the same arch. Data were collected from the dental charts, clinical and radiographic exams, self-report of sleep bruxism, measurement of maximum occlusal force, and clinical crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics with univariate and hierarchical multivariate models, at the 0.05 significance level. Results. The 30 patients (27 women) had 85 implants and 83 prostheses. Two implants were lost before prosthesis installation (implant survival: 97.6%). Ten events of prosthetic complication (screw tightening loss) occurred in five patients (success rate: 87.9%) in a single moment. Only the variable C/I ratio had a significant effect for repairable prosthesis complication (P<.05). Conclusion. The results suggest that 6- and 8-mm long implants have similar long-term clinical success for implants and prostheses.

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.11-16
• /
• 2010

Objective : This prospective study sought to verify the stability of three types of short implants measuring 7mm or less. Materials and methods : Implants measuring 7mm or less were placed in patients at multicenter dental clinics in Korea, China, Taiwan, and Singapore. Initial stability, intraoperative and postoperative complications, crestal bone loss, and survival rate of the implant were prospectively evaluated. Results : The primary stability of a 6-mm implant was lower than that of a 7-mm implant. The marginal bone loss of short implants measuring less than 7mm was minimal. Complications such as wound dehiscence, implant mobility, and peri-implant mucositis developed, and these were associated with initial implant failure. The short-term survival rate of 6-mm implant was 93.7%, and that of 7-mm implant, 96.6%. Conclusion : Short implant for the mandible with insufficient height for the residual ridge can be selectively used. Poor primary stability and wound dehiscence can cause osseointegration failure and alveolar bone loss.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.86-91
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the short-term predictability and reliability of Astra Tech implants according to the demographical distribution of patients and condition of implant sites and location of implants. Methods: Among patients treated with Astra Tech implant (Astra Tech AB) in the Department of Periodontology at the Dental Hospital of Yonsei University of College of Dentisry and K Dental Clinic from May 2004 to March 2009, 195 implants in 98 patients which had been restored more than 6 months ago were reviewed in this study. Following data were reviewed from patient charts and implants success rate was examined: 1) patient type and implant location, 2) bone status at the implant site, 3) diameter and length of the placed implants, 4) presence or absence of bone augmentation and types of the augmentation. Results: The results from this study are as follows: 1) most implants were placed in the molar area, especially 1st molar area of maxilla, 2) most implants were placed at $D_2$ and $D_3$ bone type, 3) most implants were placed in areas of B and C bone quantity, 4) autogenous and alloplastic bone graft and artificial membrane were used for placement of 74 implants. Conclusions: Short-term survival rate of Astra Tech implants was 100%.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2012

짧은 임플란트는 상악동이나 하치조신경 등의 해부학적 구조물이 있거나 심한 치조골 흡수로 인해 제한적인 치조제 높이를 가지는 부위에서 사용되고 있다. 본 연구는 길이 10 mm 이하의 임플란트에서 임플란트의 길이, 직경, 식립 부위, 골이식술 유무, 보철물의 연결고정 유무가 임플란트의 생존율과 변연골 흡수에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 원광대학교 치과병원 임플란트센터에서 길이 10 mm 이하의 임플란트를 식립한 137명의 환자, 227개 임플란트를 대상으로 진료 기록부를 통해 임플란트의 길이, 직경, 식립 위치, 골이식 유무, 보철물의 연결고정 유무를 조사하였다. 변연골 흡수량은 Emago advanced v5.6(Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 프로그램을 이용하여 측정하였다. 총 227개의 임플란트 중 8개가 실패하여, 전체 짧은 임플란트의 생존율은 96.5 %로 나타났다. 골이식 부위와 상악에 식립된 경우 더 높은 실패율을 보이는 경향이 있었으며, 임플란트의 길이와 직경은 변연골 흡수량에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 실패 요인을 조사하였을 때, 상악의 불량한 골질과 골이식 유무가 임플란트의 더 높은 실패율에 영향을 미쳤다. 10 mm 이하 임플란트에서 길이, 직경, 식립 부위, 골이식술과 보철물의 연결 고정은 임플란트 생존율과 변연골 흡수량에 영향을 끼치지 않았다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.210-217
• /
• 2012

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the current literatures and to assess outcomes of implant treatment in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Studies considered for inclusion were searched in Pub-Med. The literature search for studies published in English between 2000 and 2012 was performed. Our findings included literature assessing implant treatment in patients with a history of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). All studies were screened according to inclusion criteria. The outcome measures were survival rate of superstructures, marginal bone loss around implant and survival rate of implants. All studies were divided into two follow-up period: short term study (< 5 years) and long term study (${\geq}5$ years). RESULTS. Seven prospective studies were selected, including four short-term and three long-term studies. The survival rates of the superstructures were generally high in patients with GAP, i.e. 95.9-100%. Marginal bone loss around implant in patients with GAP as compared with implants in patients with chronic periodontitis or periodontally healthy patients was not significantly greater in short term studies but was significantly greater in long term studies. In short term studies, the survival rates of implants were between 97.4% and 100% in patients with GAP-associated tooth loss, except one study. The survival rates of implants were between 83.3% and 96% in patients with GAP in long term studies. CONCLUSION. Implant treatment in patients with GAP is not contraindicated provided that adequate infection control and an individualized maintenance program are assured.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.4-10
• /
• 2015

Mammary implants marketed by Poly Implant Proth$\grave{e}$se (PIP) were found to contain industrial grade silicone and this caused heightened anxiety and extensive publicity regarding their safety in humans. These implants were used in a large number of patients worldwide for augmentation or breast reconstruction. We reviewed articles identified by searches of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases up to May 2014 using the terms: "PIP", "Poly Implant Proth$\grave{e}$se", "breast implants" and "augmentation mammoplasty" "siloxanes" or "silicone". In addition the websites of regulating bodies in Europe, USA, and Australia were searched for reports related to PIP mammary implants. PIP mammary implants are more likely to rupture than other implants and can cause adverse effects in the short to the medium term related to the symptoms of rupture such as pain, lumps in the breast and axilla and anxiety. Based on peer-reviewed published studies we have calculated an overall rupture rate of 14.5% (383/2,635) for PIP implants. However, there is no evidence that PIP implant rupture causes long-term adverse health effects in humans so far. Silicone lymphadenopathy represents a foreign body reaction and should be treated conservatively. The long-term adverse effects usually arise from inappropriate extensive surgery, such as axillary lymph node dissection or extensive resection of breast tissue due to silicone leakage.