• Title/Summary/Keyword: Serratia spp.

Search Result 32, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

A Study on Urinary Tract Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients with an Indwelling Urinary Catheter

  • Seong, Hee-Kyung;Kim, Yoo-Ho
    • Biomedical Science Letters
    • /
    • v.7 no.3
    • /
    • pp.117-125
    • /
    • 2001
  • This study was performed in order to evaluate the risk factors for nosocomial urinary tract infection and the frequencies of organisms isolated, and to provide the epidemiologic and basic data of hospital acquired urinary tract infection in intensive care unit. A prospective analysis was performed with 1,235 urine samples following urinary bladder catheterization in 569 patients, who had no evidence of UTI at the time of catheter insertion, admitted to intensive care unit in Pusan P hospital between June 1997 and May 1998. To identify risk factors for UTI, clinical characteristics of infected patients were analyzed. We analyzed these data by percentage, chi-square and odd ratio. Obtained results were as follows: A total of 569 patients (male 341 and female 228) were an average age of 50.8 years and catheterization of 8.04 days. Incidence of UTI was 16.1% (199/1,235) and The risk factors of UTI were duration of catheterization over 7 days, no use of systemic antibiotics, summer and female, and During the first 7 days these risk factors were no use of systemic antibiotics, summer, place of first catheter insertion (ICU) and type of intensive care unit (NSICU). A total of 220 the isolated strains were Gram negative rod 83 (37.7%), yeast like fungi 74 (33.6%) and Gram positive cocci 63 (28.6%). The common organisms isolated were Enterococcus faecalis 23 (10.5%), Serratia marcescens 19 (8.6%), Pseudomonu spp.17 (7.7%), E. ooh 16 (7.3%), Staphylococcus epidemidis 11 (5.0%) mdklebsiellapneumoniae 8 (3.6%). Therefore, in these results 199 of 569 (35%) patients in ICU with indwelling urinary catheter developed UTI. The risk factors for UTI are prolonged duration of catheterization, no use of systemic antibiotics, summer, and female.

  • PDF

In vitro and in vivo Evaluations of LB 10517, a Novel Parenteral Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin

  • Song, Hye-Kyong;Nishino, Takeshi;Seo, Mi-Kyeong;Kim, Mu-Yong;Lee, Yong-Hee;Kim, In-Chull;Kwak, Jin-Hwan
    • Archives of Pharmacal Research
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.46-51
    • /
    • 1996
  • The in vitro activity of LB 10517, a new catechol-substituted cephalosporin, was compared with those of E-1077, cefpirome and ceftazidime 1034 clinical isolates collected in Japan. LB10517 showed a broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against a wide range of grampositive and gram-negative bacteria including non-glucose fermenting rods, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Against the methicillin-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Strptoccus pyogenes, the $MIC_{90}$ values of LB10517 which required to inhibit 90% of the strains wre $3.13\mug/ml\; and\; 0.1\mug/ml$, respectively. It was as active as E-1077 but more active than cefpirome and ceftazidime. Methicillin-resistant strains of S.aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus spp. were highly resistant to all the test compunds. LB10517 was highly active against most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 90% of which were inhibited at a concentration of less than $0.78\mug/ml$, except for Enterobacter cloacae ($1.56\mug/ml$) and Serratia marcescens ($3.13\mug/ml$)Its activity was comparable to those of E-1077 and cefpirome but it was greater than that of ceftazidime. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, LB10517 showed the most potent antibacterial activity among the compounds tested. Ninety percent of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible at the concentration of $0.39\mug/ml$. Its activity was 32-to 128 fold higher than those of E-1077, cefpirome and ceftazidime. Against imipenem- or ofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa, LB10517 with $MIC_{90}\; of\; 6.25 \\mug/ml\; and\; 3.13\mug/ml$, respectively, showed 16-fold more potent activity than the other test compounds. LB10517 showed a relatively high plasma level and long plasma elimination half-life in rats $(t_{1/2}(\beta,\; 52 min)\; and\; dogs\; (t_{1/2}(\beta),\; 103 min)$.

  • PDF