• 제목/요약/키워드: Sequential treatment for cleft lip/palate

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.171초

Children's Hospital Boston의 Craniofacial Centre와 구순구개열 환자의 순차적 치료순서 (Craniofacial Centre of Children's Hospital Boston and Sequential Management for Cleft Lip and Palate)

  • 정영수
    • 대한구순구개열학회지
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.59-63
    • /
    • 2008
  • Craniofacial Centre at Children's Hospital Boston is a worldwide leader in the care of children and adolescents with craniofacial anomalies especially with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, which provides a team approach to the evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of children and adults with congenital (present at birth) or acquired facial deformities. This is staffed by an experienced team of clinicians, such as in oral and maxillofacial surgery, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, dentistry, audiology, speech and language pathology, genetics, psychiatry, otolaryngology, and social work, all with specialized training in the care of children with craniofacial anomalies. Here, there is a short introduction of history, attending surgeons, works, and sequential treatment for cleft lip/palate patients about this institution.

  • PDF

Sequential treatment for a patient with hemifacial microsomia: 10 year-long term follow up

  • Seo, Jeong-Seok;Roh, Young-Chea;Song, Jae-Min;Song, Won-Wook;Seong, Hwa-Sik;Kim, Si-Yeob;Hwang, Dae-Seok;Kim, Uk-Kyu
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • 제37권
    • /
    • pp.3.1-3.7
    • /
    • 2015
  • Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is the most common craniofacial anomaly after cleft lip and cleft palate; this deformity primarily involves the facial skeleton and ear, with either underdevelopment or absence of both components. In patients with HFM, the management of the asymmetries requires a series of treatment phases that focus on their interception and correction, such as distraction osteogenesis or functional appliance treatment during growth and presurgical orthodontic treatment followed by mandibular and maxillary surgery. Satisfactory results were obtained in a 9-year-old girl with HFM who was treated with distraction osteogenesis. At the age of 19, genioplasty and mandible body augmentation with a porous polyethylene implant (PPE, $Medpor^{(R)}$, Porex) was sequentially performed for the functional and esthetic reconstruction of the face. We report a case of HFM with a review of the literature.

반안면 왜소증 환자에서의 골신장술: 증례보고 (THE USE OF DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS TO TREAT HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA: A CASE REPORT)

  • 백성문;김수관;김학균;문성용
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제33권5호
    • /
    • pp.559-566
    • /
    • 2007
  • Distraction osteogenesis(DO) is a surgical method of bone formation that involves an osteotomy and sequential stretching of the healing callus by gradual movement and subsequent remodeling. DO is used to correct facial asymmetry, such as in patients with hemifacial microsomia, maxillary or mandibular retrusion, cleft lip and palate, alveolar defects, and craniofacial deficiency. It is accomplished with the aid of a distraction device, which is secured with screws placed directly into bone, for a predetermined length of time. Hemifacial microsomia is characterized by unilateral facial hypoplasia, often with unilateral shortening of the mandible and subsequent malocclusion. Patients with hemifacial microsomia and facial asymmetry have a vertically short maxilla, tilted occlusal plane, and short mandible. Early treatment is necessary to avoid subsequent impaired midfacial growth. The standard treatment of these malformations consists of the application of bone grafts, which can lead to unpredictable growth. The new bone-lengthening procedure represents a limited surgical intervention and opens up a new perspective for treatment, especially in younger children with severe deformities. This report describes a case of hemifacial microsomia(Type-II left-sided hemifacial microsomia). The patient, a 10-year-old child, visited our clinic for facial asymmetry correction. He had a hypoplastic mandible, displaced ear lobe, 10 mm canting on the right side, and malocclusion. We planned DO to lengthen the left mandible in conjunction with a Le Fort I osteotomy for decanting and then perform a right intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy(IVRO). Progressive distraction at a rate of 0.5 mm/12 hours was initiated 7 days postoperatively. The duration of DO was 17 days. The consolidation period was 3 months. Satisfactory results were obtained in our case, indicating that DO can be used successfully for functional, aesthetic reconstruction of the mandible. We report a case involving DO in conjunction with orthognathic surgery for correcting mandibular hypoplasia with a review of the literature.