• 제목/요약/키워드: Seong Dae-Jung

검색결과 574건 처리시간 0.029초

Bell's Palsy에 대한 침치료와 침치료 및 정안침요법 병행치료의 비교연구 (Comparative Clinical Study of Jung-an Acupuncture and General Acupuncture on Bell's Palsy Patients)

  • 김성환;김재수;이봉효;임성철;정태영;이경민
    • Journal of Acupuncture Research
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.43-49
    • /
    • 2010

  • Objectives : This study was designed to evaluate the effect of Jung-an acupuncture on Bell's palsy(peripheral facial paralysis) patients. Methods : We investigated 24 cases of patients with peripheral facial paralysis. The patients were divided into two groups. Both Group A, B were treated with general acupuncture and Group A was added to treatment with Jung-an acupuncture. We evaluated the treatment effect of each group three times by using Yanagihara's unweighted grading system. Results : As a result of evaluation by using Yanagihara score, they were not significant scores between two groups after treatment. Conclusions : Jung-an acupuncture and general Acupuncture has significant effect on acute(before 4 weeeks at onset) Bell's palsy. But there is no statistical significance in Jung-an acupuncture on acute phase(within 4 weeks of onset).

  • PDF KSCI

민주주의의 공고화와 복지국가의 발전 : 문민정부와 국민의 정부 비교 (Democratic Consolidation and Welfare State Development : A Comparison of the Kim Young Sam Government and the Kim Dae Jung Government)

  • 성경륭
    • 한국사회복지학
    • /
    • 제46권
    • /
    • pp.145-177
    • /
    • 2001

  • This paper seeks to analyze how the welfare state has developed both in the Kim Young Sam government and in the Kim Dae Jung government. Among other things, the two governments share some similarities: compared to the previous authoritarian governments, both of them enjoyed a high level of democratic legitimacy; the two were under pressure to win the elections to acquire and remain in power; and finally, the two tried to strengthen welfare system. But there exist more critical differences. The Kim Dae Jung government was a minority government, while the Kim Young Sam government was a majority one. Compared to the latter one, the former came to power in an extremely bad economic condition. Fortunately, however, the Kim Dae Jung government was able to enjoy a relatively high level of state autonomy resulting from an exceptional situation of foreign currency crisis. In addition, it was more reformist in policy orientation and had a more open cooperative network with civil society. All these differences added up to produce remarkable differences with regard to the improvement in welfare development. Especially, it is noted that the Kim Dae Jung government was very successful in several respects: provision of national minimum, integration of national medical insurance, development of productive welfare system, and final1y increase in welfare spending. Recently, criticisms from the opposition party, the press, and middle and upper class people mount against the Kim Dae Jung government which has made significant mistakes in instituting the separation of medical and pharmaceutical businesses. However, the important improvements in welfare institutions and programs by the Kim Dae Jung government need to be maintained to deal with all the negative effects of a naked market economy. They must also be sustained to keep alive democracy that Korean people have fought for nearly half a century.

  • PDF