• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2022

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is effective for biliary drainage, especially in pancreaticobiliary cancer. The mechanical properties, material, and design of SEMS are important in preventing recurrent biliary obstruction and complication. Radial and chronic expansion forces play roles in preventing stent migration and collapse. Complications, such as stent impaction, cholecystitis, and pancreatitis, were related to the axial force. The nickel-titanium alloy shows more flexibility, conformability, and optimal axial force compared to previously used stainless steel. Additionally, the stent structure affected the mechanical properties of SEMS. Therefore, understanding the mechanical properties, material, and design of SEMS will provide the best outcome for biliary drainage, as well as better SEMS development.

• Clinical Endoscopy
• /
• 제56권2호
• /
• pp.135-142
• /
• 2023

Endoscopic biliary drainage strategies for managing unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction differ in terms of stent type, drainage area, and deployment method. However, the optimal endoscopic drainage strategy remains unclear. Uncovered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are the preferred type because of their higher functional success rate, longer time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and fewer cases of reintervention than plastic stents (PS). Other PS subtypes and covered SEMS, which feature a longer time to RBO than PS, can be removed during reintervention for RBO. Bilateral SEMS placement is associated with a longer time to RBO and a longer survival time than unilateral SEMS placement. Unilateral drainage is acceptable if a drainage volume of greater than 50% of the total liver volume can be achieved. In terms of deployment method, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes between side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent deployment. Simultaneous SBS boasts a shorter procedure time and higher technical success rate than sequential SBS. This review of previous studies aimed to clarify the optimal endoscopic biliary drainage strategy for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.37-47
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The endoscopic management of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) has been suggested for the primary treatment of patients with anastomotic leaks after total gastrectomy. Embedded stents due to tissue ingrowth and migration are the main obstacles in endoscopic stent management. Materials and Methods: The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic management were evaluated for anastomotic leaks when using a benign fully covered SEMS with an anchoring thread and thick silicone covering the membrane to prevent stent embedding and migration. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 14 consecutive patients with gastric cancer and anastomotic leaks after total gastrectomy treated from January 2009 to December 2016. Results: The technical success rate of endoscopic stent replacement was 100%, and the rate of complete leaks closure was 85.7% (n=12). The mean size of leaks was 13.1 mm (range, 3-30 mm). The time interval from operation to stent replacement was 10.7 days (range, 3-35 days) and the interval from stent replacement to extraction was 32.3 days (range, 18-49 days). The complication rate was 14.1%, and included a single jejunal ulcer and delayed stricture at the site of leakage. No embedded stent or migration occurred. Two patients died due to progression of pneumonia and septic shock 2 weeks after stent replacement. Conclusions: A benign fully covered SEMS with an anchoring thread and thick membrane is an effective and safe stent in patients with anastomotic leaks after total gastrectomy. The novelty of this stent is that it provides complete prevention of stent migration and embedding, compared with conventional fully covered SEMS.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.318-324
• /
• 1992

기관지내 팽창성 금속 스텐트의 사용은, 아직은 외국의 경우에서도, 추적 관찰기간이 짧고 시술받은 환자의 수도 많지 않으며 장기간 삽입후의 변화에 대하여는 그 결과가 예측하기 힘들다는 점등을 생각할 때는 현재 이의 시행은 아직은 실험적 단계라 할 수 있다. 그러나 내과적 혹은 외과적인 문제로 수술적 기관지 보존술등을 시행받기 어려운 상태에 있는 기관지 협착환자에서는 단독으로, 혹은 laser therapy, electrocoagulation, cryotherapy, balloon dilatation 및 다른 tracheal devices (예(例): Montgomery T-tube)등 의 치료방법들과 같이 병행하여, 팽창성 금속 스텐트의 삽입은 기관기관지 협착증의 치료에 도움이 되리라 생각된다. 또 국내에서는 아직도 유병율이 높은 폐결핵환자에서 충분한 기간동안 약물치료후에도 일부 환자에서는 기관지 결핵에 의하여 기관지 협착이 발생하는데 이때 수술적 치료외에는 적절한 치료방법이 없는 실정이다. 이러한 환자에서 만약 협착부위가 한쪽 주 기관지에 부분적으로 국한 되어 있으며 그 이하의 폐실질파괴가 심하지 않다면 스텐트 삽입은 수술적 치료이전에 시도하여 볼 수 있으리라 사료된다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.107-111
• /
• 2000

Although a tracheal stent can be an option for inoperable tracheal stenoses there still are some troublesome side effects including overgranulation from foreign body irritation restenosis and patient's discomfort associated with the procedure. We report a successful case of a retrievable stent made of self-expandable 'shape memory' metal and polyurethane in a 24 year old female patient with respiratory distress and tight stenosis in the trachea and left main bronchus, The stent was inserted following a balloon dilatation and was successfully removed on the 7th days after the procedure. She regained a normal active life without any repiratory symptoms and a follow-up of 8 months showed satisfactory results.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2009

상부 위장관 스텐트 삽입술은 근치적 수술이 불가능한 상부 악성 종양에 의한 상부 위장관 협착 환자의 폐쇄 증상 완화를 위한 보존적 치료로서 확립되었으며 내시경 개발 기술이 발달하고 임상 경험이 축적됨에 따라서 여러 상부 위장관 질환에서 스텐트 삽입술을 보다 편리하고 안전하게 시행할 수 있게 되었다. 그러나 스텐트 삽입술 이후에는 동통, 출혈, 천공과 같은 조기 합병증이나 스텐트 일탈, 스텐트 폐쇄 등의 후기 합병증이 발생할 수 있으므로 사후 관리 또한 중요하다.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.742-750
• /
• 2021

Objective: To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic enteral stent placement for recurrent malignant obstruction in patients with surgically altered bowel anatomy. Materials and Methods: Between July 2009 and May 2019, 36 patients (27 men and 9 women; mean age, 62.7 ± 12.0 years) underwent percutaneous transhepatic stent placement for recurrent malignant bowel obstruction after surgery. In all patients, conventional endoscopic peroral stent placement failed due to altered bowel anatomy. The stent was placed with a transhepatic approach for an afferent loop obstruction (n = 27) with a combined transhepatic and peroral approach for simultaneous stent placement in afferent and efferent loop obstruction (n = 9). Technical and clinical success, complications, stent patency, and patient survival were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Clinical success was achieved in 30 patients (83.3%). Three patients required re-intervention (balloon dilatation [n = 1] and additional stent placement [n = 2] for insufficient stent expansion). Major complications included transhepatic access-related perihepatic biloma (n = 2), hepatic artery bleeding (n = 2), bowel perforation (n = 1), and sepsis (n = 1). The 3- and 12-months stent patency and patient survival rates were 91.2%, 66.5% and 78.9%, 47.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Percutaneous enteral stent placement using transhepatic access for recurrent malignant obstruction in patients with surgically altered bowel anatomy is safe and clinically efficacious. Transhepatic access is a good alternative route for afferent loop obstruction and can be combined with a peroral approach for simultaneous afferent and efferent loop obstruction.