• Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.260-270
• /
• 2020

Purposes: Sepsis is a critical condition in which nurses should detect clinical manifestations and provide early intervention to prevent unwanted serious conditions in the patients. The initial occurrence and management of sepsis take place in general units, but there is a lack of knowledge in nurses. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a case-based sepsis education program and compare the case-based education program with and without smartphone applications. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design with a control group was used. We provided a case-based education program with and without smartphone applications to the nurses and tested the effects of the program on knowledge, the accuracy of sepsis assessment, and self-efficacy as outcome variables. A total of 60 nurses in general units participated. To test differences in knowledge, the accuracy of sepsis assessment, and self-efficacy regarding sepsis between the groups over time, a mixed-design ANCOVA was used for parametric analysis, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used for nonparametric analysis. Results: There were significant differences in knowledge, the accuracy of sepsis assessment, and self-efficacy between the groups and within the groups over time. The intervention groups treated with the case-based education program showed improved outcome variables compared to the control group. There was no difference between case-based education with the smartphone application or without the application. Conclusions: The case-based education improved knowledge, the accuracy of sepsis assessment, and self-efficacy in the care of sepsis by nurses working in the general wards. The results suggest that the case-based education program for nurses was effective and eventually improved patient health outcomes.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.37-53
• /
• 2022

Objectives : This study analyzed the concordance between student self-assessment and peer-evaluation in a role play using the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) scenario developed based on Korean medical syndrome differentiation. Methods : The subjects of this study are first-year-students majoring in Korean Medicine. The role play based on clinical case was performed in the class of Korean Medicine Classics. Feedback on clinical skill competency got through student self-assessment and peer-evaluation, and this study was compared and analyzed of result. Results : A simple comparison of the results of self-assessment and peer-evaluation in the evaluation results of clinical skill competency may appear to be consistent. However, it was not statistically significant. It is necessary to enhance the discriminative ability in the evaluation of clinical skill competency. It will be possible to improve a bit by relatively increasing the weight of the scores on the items that students expect to respond differently among the evaluation items. In addition, in order to dramatically improve the systemicity and reliability of the evaluation of clinical skill competency itself, it is necessary to introduce the Introduction to Clinical Traditional Korean Medicine (ICTKM) course. Conclusions : Student's self-assessment and peer-evaluation as feedback on clinical skill competency are suitable for the purpose of education and training. However, the reliability of the evaluation was not statistically significant.

• 대한감각통합치료학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2014

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 ASI$^{(R)}$의 중재 교육을 6명의 작업치료사에게 실시하고, 교육 전과 후에 ASI$^{(R)}$의 중심원리 수행도를 자기-평가, 타인-평가, 전문가-평가로 알아보는 것이다. 연구 방법: 2013년 11월 30일부터 2014년 6월 30일까지 총 6명의 작업치료사를 대상으로 연구가 이루어졌다. 총 8주 동안 6회의 ASI$^{(R)}$ 중재 교육을 실시하였고, 대상자들이 ASI$^{(R)}$ 중재 교육 전에 촬영한 치료 동영상과 교육 후에 촬영한 치료 동영상을 평가하였다. 평가는 교육전과 후에 자기-평가, 타인-평가, 전문가-평가로 실시하였고, 이 자료를 바탕으로 Mann-Whitney, ICC (Intra-Class Correlation)로 분석하였다. 결과: 영역III(평가기록), IV(공간과 도구), V(부모, 교사와의 의사소통)의 구조적 요소 합의 결과는 $79.33{\pm}18.27$점이었다. 평가방법에 따른 ASI$^{(R)}$ 중재 교육 전과 후의 과정요소 차이를 살펴본 결과, 자기-평가에서는 '감각조절 제공', '활동선택에서 협력', '활동의 성공보장', '놀이에 대한 아동의 내적 동기를 지지', '치료적 연합', '과정요소의 합'에서 교육 전보다 교육 후에 점수가 향상되었다. 타인-평가에서는 '물리적 안정성 보장'을 제외한 모든 항목에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 전문가-평가에서는 '감각의 기회제공'을 제외한 모든 항목에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. ASI$^{(R)}$ 중재 교육 전에 실시한 자기-평가와 전문가-평가에서는 '물리적 안정성 보장'항목에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 교육 후에 실시한 자기-평가와 전문가-평가에서도 '물리적 안정성 보장' 항목에서 차이를 보였다. 결론: 본 연구의 결과는 정확한 감각통합중재를 위해 ASI$^{(R)}$의 중재 교육이 필요함을 강조하고, 치료사 스스로의 치료적 스타일을 점검하는 것이 중요하다는 것을 제시한다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.253-273
• /
• 2007

This study explores issues on how students' variables are related to their educational achievement in English subject. The National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) is conduced every year to measure educational progress and achievement, and to monitor the quality of education at the national level and appropriateness of the national curriculum. It also serves the purpose to collect background information affecting educational achievement. The background information is gathered by using questionnaires for students, teachers and school administrators. Among the student variables in the national level educational achievement assessment is self-regulated learning, which is composed of self-efficacy, self-control and learning strategy. In the NAEA in 2005 it was found that the features of self-regulated learning were significantly correlated to test scores in English. The findings from the analysis of the trends of the relationships between test scores in English and information on students' self-regulated learning provide implications for the national curriculum as well as for learning and teaching.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.536-544
• /
• 2009

Purpose : This study aimed to examine the relationship between intragroup peer evaluation and self-directed learning readiness(SDLR) in an Introduction to Education class that used a team based learning(TBL). Moreover, it identified the specific components of the SDLR that predicted the peer evaluation results. Method : The research subject pool comprised of 87 $1^{st}$ students in D Health College. Each team was composed of 6~8 members, each of whom evaluated all other members on his or her team SDLR was measured by using SDLR-K-96. Results : SDLR and peer assessment scores had a positive relationship, confirming that SDLR was an important variable that could predict the peer evaluation scores. Among the SDLR factors, 'openness to challenge' and 'self-confidence as a learner' was shown to have the predictive power for the peer assessment. Conclusion : The colleges should provide dental hygiene students with learning opportunities on ability to do self-directed learning through diverse learning methods such as team based learning.

• International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.138-145
• /
• 2003

Performance assessment was introduced to improvement of self-directed learning and method of assessment for differenced learning as the seventh educational curriculum is enforced. Performance assessment is overcoming limitation about problem solving ability and higher thinking abilities assessment that is problem of a written examination and get into the spotlight by way for quality of class and school normalization. But, performance assessment has problems about possibilities of assessment fault by appraisal, fairness, reliability, and validity of grading, ambiguity of grading standard, difficulty about objectivity security etc. This study proposes fuzzy performance assessment system to solve problem of the conventional performance assessment. This paper presented an objective and reliable performance assessment method through fuzzy reasoning, design fuzzy membership function and define fuzzy rule analyzing factor that influence in each sacred ground of performance assessment to account principle subject. Also, performance assessment item divides by formation estimation and subject estimation and designed membership function in proposed performance assessment method. Performance assessment result that is worked through fuzzy performance assessment system can pare down burden about appraisal's fault and provide fair and reliable assessment result through grading that have correct standard and consistency to students.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.134-149
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 초등 과학 지도교사 3인의 학생 평가 전문성을 파악하고, 이를 신장시키기 위한 전략적인 방안을 탐색하는데 있다. 연구는 질적 사례 연구 방법으로 진행되었으며, 자료수집을 위해 자기 인식 체크리스트, 심층 면담을 실시하였다. 자료 분석은 연구자를 포함한 과정 중심 평가 선도 교원 2인과 초등 과학 교육 전문가 2인의 검토와 합의를 거쳤다. 그 결과, 연구 참여자 3인의 학생 평가 전문성 자기 인식 수준은 비교적 높았지만, 공통적으로 결과 환류 영역의 척도 평균이 가장 낮았다. 또한 연구 참여자들의 학생 평가 전문성은 서로 다른 수준과 특징을 보였으며, 학생 평가 전문성에 대한 인식과 실제의 불일치도 일부 발견되었다. 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장을 위해서는 전략적인 지원과 교육이 필요하며, 초등 과학 학생 평가 전문성 자기 진단 도구개발이 선행되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.230-239
• /
• 2002

본 연구에서는 서울 지역의 중 고등학생 449명을 대상으로 수행평가에 관한 인식과 자아효능감을 분석하였다. 학생들은 평가의 목적이나 기존의 정기고사와의 차별성 등 수행평가의 특성에 대해 비교적 이해하고는 있으나, 수행평가가 자신의 과학 학습이나, 잠재적인 능력을 개발하는데는 별 도움을 주지 않는다고 응답하였다. 또한 평가의 신뢰성이나, 평가 기준의 타당성에 대해서도 만족하지 못하였다. 고등학생은 중학생에 비해 수행평가의 신뢰도와 타당도에 대해서 더 부정적(p<.01)이었다. 여학생은 수행평가의 신뢰도에 대해 남학생보다 긍정적으로 인식하였다(p<.00). 학생들의 수행평가에 대한 전체적인 자아효능감 수준은 높지 않았다. 과제의 수행과정에 대한 자아효능감 수준은 높으나, 과제 수행 결과의 정리에 대한 자아효능감은 상대적으로 낮았다. 과학과의 수행평가를 타 교과의 수행평가나 기존의 과학정기고사 보다 더 어렵게 느끼지는 않았다. 과제의 수행 과정 중 실험 절차에 대한 이해, 실험 도구의 활용에 대해서는 자아효능감이 높았으나, 실험의 목표에 대한 이해, 토론 수업에서 토론 주제에 대한 이해에 관한 자아효능감은 높지 않았다. 과제 수행결과의 정리에 있어서는, 실험 결과의 정리, 실험 결과의 토의 문제에 대한 서술에서 상대적으로 낮은 자아효능감을 나타내었다. 여학생들의 자아효능감 수준이 남학생의 자아효능감 수준보다 높았다(p<.05). 여학생의 경우는 남학새의 수행평가 점수 보다 높았으며 자아효능감과 수행평가 점수도 유의미한 상관(r=.342)이 있었다(p<.05).

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.447-457
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of consumer's self-assessment on actual diets and to analyze its accuracy by consumer's health status. The results were as follows: In general, many consumers misunderstood or assessed inaccurately their actual diets. In particular, the Extreme Optimists and the Optimists were the consumers whose diets were poor, but who assessed wrongly their actual diet quality. In relation with their health status, these two groups showed that the better the consumers consider their health, the more the Extreme Optimists and the Optimists are.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.91-108
• /
• 2007

This study investigates learners' perception on their engagement in rating activities in the EFL essay-writing context. The current study aims to address the answers to the following research questions: 1) What attitude do students show about their participation in the rating tasks? and 2) which of three aspects (e.g. the degree of rating experience, the exposure to English composition instruction and learning, and proficiency level) significantly influences learners' rating activities? 104 EFL learners participated in the rater training session. After participants finished rater training session, they rated three sample essays and peer essays using the given scoring guide. Based on the analysis of survey responses that students made, students showed positive attitude toward their engagement in rating tasks. For research question 2, only L2 writing proficiency seriously affected students' perception on the rating tasks. Advanced level of subjects did not feel stressed by a grade of peers as low level of subjects did. They were also critical about the benefits of self- and peer-assessment, suggesting that a peer's feedback on their own essay was not so useful and that a self-rating does not fully help learners identify their writing proficiency.