• Title/Summary/Keyword: Secrecy of correspondence

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Study on the Conflict Between the Call for Journalists' Phone Records and the Shield Law: Focusing on the Review of Paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Act of Protection of the Secrecy of Correspondence (기자의 통화내역 조회와 취재원 보호 간의 갈등: 통신비밀보호법 제13조 제2항 논의를 중심으로)

  • Lee, Seung-Sun
    • Korean journal of communication and information
    • /
    • v.25
    • /
    • pp.103-133
    • /
    • 2004
  • Korean citizens enjoy not only the freedom of communication but also the secrecy of electronic communication. Article 18 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea prescribes that the secrecy of correspondence should not be infringed. Namely, all citizens enjoy guaranteed privacy of correspondence. But many people have been experiencing the infringement of those rights. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether Paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Act on Protection of the Secrecy of Correspondence infringes on the constitutional rights of privacy of electronic communication. The results of this study indicate that the law violates the Constitution. Paragraph 3, Article 12 (Personal Liberty, Personal Integrity) of the constitution stipulates that "Warrants issued by a judge through due process (upon the request of a prosecutor) have to be presented in case of arrest, detention, seizure, or search." However, prosecutors, the police, and National Intelligence Service have made numerous inquiries calling for the journalists' telephone records without warrants issued by a judge. So, this study suggests that the paragraph should be amended to be compatible with the Constitution. Meanwhile, journalists should make a more concerted effort to protect their news sources in exercising constitutionally protected freedom of the press.

  • PDF