• Archives of Reconstructive Microsurgery
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.35-43
• /
• 1999

There are lots of reconstructive ways like direct closure, skin graft, local flap, regional flap, distant flap, free flap and so on. Microsurgical reconstruction is regarded as the last step in various reconstructive methods. So the failure of this last step causes the troublesome situation for both of patients and surgeon. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the problems in failed free flap surgery and to introduce the strategy of appropriate management in wound of free flap failure. We performed 252 cases of free flap surgeries from May, 1988 to June, 1998. Among these cases, we failed 9 cases of free flaps. Patients' age ranged from 19 to 63. There were 7 males and 2 females. Site of failure were 3 head and neck areas, 2 hands, and 4 lower extremities. However there was no failure in breast, trunk, buttock, and genitalia. 7 patients who had region of head and neck, and lower extremity underwent the second free flap surgery successfully in postoperative 4 to 16 days following debridement of necrotic tissue. However 2 patients who had region in hand were managed with conventional treatment like skin graft and distant flap. Vein grafts were needed in 3 cases of 7 second free flaps, and 1 patients needed sequentially-linked free flaps with two flaps. The second free flaps were inevitable for head and neck area because the large complex wound may cause the lifethreatening condition without immediate coverage with well vascularized flap. Lower extremity also needed second free flap for limb salvage. Hand could be managed with conventional method, even though healing time was quite delayed. We thought second free flap surgery in free flap failure cases should be performed with more careful preoperative evaluation and refined surgery. Success of second free flap surgery could recover the very difficult situation due to previously failed operation.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Recycling extracorporeal irradiated autograft is used as one of the reconstruction methods after limb salvage with malignant bone tumor. However, there were some problems such as joint instability, progressive arthritis, insufficient joint resection margin were found after intraarticular recycling autograft. Thus, we carried out a research in order to investigate the results of recycling total joint autotransplantation after extracorporeal irradiation that could resolve the problems. Materials and Methods: There were five cases of patients who were diagnosed as osteosarcom around the knee joint and underwent same operation from June 1997 to Feb 2006. All patients had been evaluated from 93 to 105 months (mean 100 months) and their mean age was 21.6. Results: The roentgenographic union of junctional sites began at 15.6 months (9~40 months) postoperatively. As regards to the orthopaedic functional results, we used the criteria of Ennecking et al. Overall mean functional result was 71.6%. Complication such as epiphyseal collapse (three cases) and joint instability (five cases) were noted respectively. In all the cases, tumor prosthesis was used to replace the knee joint. Conclusion: Because recycling total joint autotransplantation after extracorporeal irradiation does not prevent joint instability and progressive arthritis, tumor prosthesis is recommended in young adult.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.53 no.6
• /
• pp.466-477
• /
• 2018

Orthopaedics is an area where 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology is most likely to be utilized because it has been used to treat a range of diseases of the whole body. For arthritis, spinal diseases, trauma, deformities, and tumors, 3D printing can be used in the form of anatomical models, surgical guides, metal implants, bio-ceramic body reconstruction, and orthosis. In particular, in orthopaedic oncology, patients have a wide variety of tumor locations, but limited options for the limb salvage surgery have resulted in many complications. Currently, 3D printing personalized implants can be fabricated easily in a short time, and it is anticipated that all bone tumors in various surgical sites will be reconstructed properly. An improvement of 3D printing technology in the healthcare field requires close cooperation with many professionals in the design, printing, and validation processes. The government, which has determined that it can promote the development of 3D printing-related industries in other fields by leading the use of 3D printing in the medical field, is also actively supporting with an emphasis on promotion rather than regulation. In this review, the experience of using 3D printing technology for bone tumor surgery was shared, expecting orthopaedic surgeons to lead 3D printing in the medical field.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.53 no.6
• /
• pp.505-512
• /
• 2018

Purpose: Many reconstruction methods have been attempted after an en-bloc resection of the proximal humerus. In particular, the introduction of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has made a breakthrough in the functional recovery of the shoulder. Nevertheless, RSA has limitations when the humeral bone stock loss is significant. In addition, it is unclear if RSA is effective in patients showing failure with non-operative treatment of a proximal humeral tumor. Materials and Methods: A reconstruction was performed using an overlapping allograft-RSA composite for 11 patients with a failed proximal humeral construct. Delayed RSA was performed on 6 patients with failed non-operative treatment. The pre- and postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the complications were addressed. Results: Overlapping allograft-RSA composite afforded a stable construct in 11 failed proximal humeral reconstructions and the patient's chief complaints were resolved. The mean time to the union of overlapped allograft-host junction was 5.5 months. Average preoperative MSTS score of 20.3 point increased to 25.7 point, postoperatively. Four of the six patients who had RSA within 4 years from the index operation showed arm elevation of more than $90^{\circ}$ whereas the remaining 5 patients showed some disability. The complications include one case each of dislocation and aseptic infection, which were resolved by changing the polyethylene liner and scar revision, respectively. None of the 6 patients who underwent delayed RSA after the failure of non-operative treatment showed arm elevation more than $90^{\circ}$. Conclusion: An overlapping allograft-RSA composite is a simple and reliable reconstructive modality in patients with massive bone loss. In patients with metastatic cancer necessitating a surgical resection at presentation, early conversion to RSA is recommended to secure functional recovery.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2004

Purpose: The current study was performed to analyze the oncological and functional results, and the patient, the limb and the prosthesis survival of osteosarcoma around the knee in children according to the treatment options. Materials and Methods: From 1982 to 2002, 63 patients with osteosarcoma around the knee underwent surgical treatments before 16 years of age. Surgical treatment options were amputation, endoprosthetic replacement, and implantation of low heat-treated autogenous bone graft after wide resection of tumor. The mean age of patients was 11.5 years (4.4~16), and the mean follow-up period was 6.1 years (2.1~16.8). All patients had neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. All endoprosthses were extendible types. Anatomical locations of osteosarcoma were distal femur in 40 patients, and proximal tibia in 23 patients. As regard to Enneking stage, 4 patients had stage $II_A$, 50 patients had stage $II_B$, and 9 patients had stage III tumors. Results: The 5 year survival rate of stage $II_B$ patients was 72.7% in amputation, 83.7% in endoprosthesis, and 100% in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. The 5 year survival rate of salvaged limb was 84.4% in endoprosthesis, and 80% in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. The survival rate of prosthesis was 92.7% at 5 years, 67.4% at 10 years in endoprosthesis, and 75% at 5 years in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. Mean functional outcome scores were 8.7 points in amputation, 20.6 points in endoprosthesis, and 16 points in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. Distant metastasis occurred 15.8% in amputation, 27% in endoprosthesis and local recurrence occurred 8.1% in endoprosthesis, 14.3% in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. Major complications happened 26.3% in amputation, 35.1% in endoprosthesis, and 28.6% in low heat-treated autogenous bone graft. Conclusion: Limb salvage procedure had functionally better results than amputation in children with osteosarcoma around the knee. Reconstruction with endoprosthesis after resection of tumor had good results in children as adults. In certain circumstances as too small bone for endoprosthesis or minimal bony destruction or too skeletally immature patient, low heat-treated autogenous bone graft may be a good treatment option. Low heat-treated autogenous bone graft may be considered as not only a substitute for endoprosthesis but also a temporary method before endoprosthesis.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.54 no.1
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2019

Purpose: Tumor infiltration around the knee joint or skip metastasis, repeated infection sequelae after tumor prosthesis implantation, regional recurrence, and mechanical failure of the megaprosthesis might require combined distal femur and proximal tibia replacement (CFTR). Among the aforementioned situations, there are few reports on the indication, complications, and implant survival of CFTR in temporarily arthrodesed patients who had a massive bony defect on either side of the knee joint to control infection. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four CFTR patients were reviewed retrospectively and 13 temporary arthrodesed cases switched to CFTR were extracted. All 13 cases had undergone a massive bony resection on either side of the knee joint and temporary arthrodesis state to control the repeated infection. This paper describes the diagnosis, tumor location, number of operations until CFTR, duration from the index operation to CFTR, survival of CFTR, complications, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Results: According to Kaplan-Meier plot, the 5- and 10-year survival of CFTR was 69.0%±12.8%, 46.0%±20.7%, respectively. Six (46.2%) of the 13 cases had major complications. Three cases underwent removal of the prosthesis and were converted to arthrodesis due to infection. Two cases underwent partial change of the implant due to loosening and periprosthetic fracture. The remaining case with a deep infection was resolved after extensive debridement. At the final follow-up, the average MSTS score of 10 cases with CFTR was 24.6 (21-27). In contrast, the MSTS score of 3 arthrodesis cases with failed CFTR was 12.3 (12-13). The average range of motion of the 10 CFTR cases was 67° (0°-100°). The mean extension lag of 10 cases was 48° (20°-80°). Conclusion: Although the complication rates is substantial, conversion of an arthrodesed knee to a mobile joint using CFTR in a patient who had a massive bony defect on either side of the knee joint to control infection should be considered. The patient's functional outcome was different from the arthrodesed one. For successful conversion to a mobile joint, thorough the eradication of scar tissue and creating sufficient space for the tumor prosthesis to flex the knee joint up to 60° to 70° without soft tissue tension.