• Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.647-651
• /
• 1996

The development of an enrichment method for the rapid and effective identification of Salmonella spp. in sewage or food was studied. As a growth factor for Salmonella, 10 mM cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in trypticase soy broth with 0.6% yeast extract (TSBYE) increased cell number five-folds and 0.6% yeast extract in selenite broth increased cell number ten-folds of control. Bile salts in selenite broth was tested for the selection of S. enteritidis in a mixture with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactobacillus plantarum and Escherichia coli. The latter four strains were effectively inhibited at 0.1% bile salt. A two-step culture method was used to enrich Salmonella spp.; a primary-enrichment and secondary- enrichment culture. At a primary-enrichment step, selenite broth with 0.6% yeast extract and 10 mM cAMP was used, and at a secondary-enrichment step, 0.1% bile salt was additionally used. Culture times of a primary- enrichment and a secondary-enrichment step were 8 hr and 6 hr, respectively. In this procedure, cell number increased from 10$^{0.3}$ to 10$^{8.5}$ with inhibition of other strains within 14 hr. In the case of an initial cell concentrarion as low as 10$^{-2}$ cfu/ml, a cell number increased to 10$^{7}$ cfu/ml by using a 10 hr primary-enrichment and 6 hr secondary-enrichment procedure.

• Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.295-300
• /
• 2009

The specificity and sensitivity of oligonucleotide primers were examined for the rapid detection of Salmonella in meat samples. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study were designed with the modification of mdh and invA sequence in the chromosome of Salmonella Typhimurium. Through the subsequent analysis of the specificity and sensitivity of the primers, two types of oligonucleotide primers, SLM1 and SLT4 were selected for the detection of Salmonella genus specific and S. Typhimurium species specific, respectively. The lowest detection limit of each primer was represented as 1 cell per reaction when reacted with a prepared DNA solution. The detection efficiency of the two primers was analysed with beef and pork samples intentionally contaminated with a mixture of Salmonella culture, and three preparation methods -, namely direct reaction after extraction, enrichment after extraction, and DNA extraction after enrichment for PCR reaction, - were also compared. No differences were found in the results according to meat sources and preparation methods.