• 제목/요약/키워드: Safety awareness

검색결과 1,102건 처리시간 0.02초

동물병원 방사선사를 위한 대학 방사선학과 교육과정 개발 필요성 - D 대학 사례 중심으로 - (Necessity of Developing University Radiology Curriculum for Veterinary Hospital Radiological Technologists - D University Case Focusing -)

  • 이원정
    • 한국방사선학회논문지
    • /
    • 제18권3호
    • /
    • pp.203-212
    • /
    • 2024
  • 동물병원 방사선사를 위한 대학 방사선학과 교육과정을 개발에 기초자료로 사용 하고자 동물병원전문와 방사선학과 재학생들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 동물병원전문가 20명을 대상으로 기본정보와 방사선검사 교육 이수, 방사선검사 실시 경험, 동물케어 및 동물 해부 생리학 교육 이수, 방사선 안전관리 교육 이수, 방사선 생물학 교육 이수에 대해서, 방사선학과 재학생 171명을 대상으로 기본정보와 취업진로 분야, 동물병원 인식 분야, 동물병원 관련 학과 환경에 대해 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과는 엑셀에 정량적으로 입력 후 SPSS ver. 26.0 을 사용하여 분석하였다. 재학생 의 평균 나이는 22.6세 이었고, 전체 171명 중 남자 92명이었고 여자는 79명이었다. 취업진로 분야에서 전체 대상자의 62.6%가 의료기관 취업전망이 좋다고 응답하였고, 의료기관 외 취업 희망에서는 동물병원이 83명으로 가장 높았다. 동물병원 취업을 희망한다고 응답한 83명 중 64명이 동물을 좋아해서, 47명이 발전 가능성이 높아서 동물병원 취업을 희망하였다. 동물병원 발전 가능성이 있다고 응답한 159명 중 96.2% 반려동물증가로 인한다고 응답하였다. 동물병원 관련 학과 환경에서는 94.7% 관련 기자재가 없다고 응답하였고, 학과에 동물케어 교과목 72.5%, 해부생리 82.5%로 개설이 필요하다고 응답하였다. 76.6% 동물관련 교과목이 개설되면 수강 의사가 있다고 응답하였다. 동물병원전문가 전체 대상자 20명 중에 4명이 동물에 대한 방사선 검사 경험이 없었고, 방사선사 2명, 기타 2명 이었다. 동물방사선 검사에 대한 교육을 받지 않은 자는 7명 이었고, 방사선사 2명은 동물 케어와 동물 해부생리에 대한 교육을 받지 않았다. 본 연구는 향후 동물병원에 취업하는 방사선사를 위한 방사선학과 교육과정 개발에 도움이 될 것으로 사료된다.

일부 직업인들의 근골격계 자각증상과 강증진생활양식간의 연관성에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Relationship between Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Health Promoting Life Style among Some Workers)

  • 강홍구;이은경;전선영;김상덕;정재열;이영길;장두섭;송용선;이기남
    • 대한예방한의학회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.40-68
    • /
    • 2001
  • In this study, grade of subjective symptom appealed by laborer of Jeollabuk-do was evaluated using questionary regarding factor made effect on musculoskeletal disease and in addition, studied relationship with health promotion life style of them. Based on the result, relationship of general characteristics of musculoskeletal subjective symptom and life-style of the subjects was concluded as below. 1. General characteristics of study subjects were as following. Ratio of male was higher as 57.7% of male and 42.2% female and age distribution was 5.1% of 20s, 34.99% of 30s, 36.3% of 40s and 23.7% of 50s and therefore, $30{\sim}40$ aged groups showed highest ratio. Most subjects (74.9%) was married status and in case of education level, high-school graduate and dropout (23.3%) and over-college graduate (46.8%) showed highest distribution. $1{\sim}2$ Mil. KRW (29.5%) and $2{\sim}2.99$ Mil. KRW (21.2%) is the main income distribution and however there was high ratio of non-reply (29.0%). In case of employment period, $10{\sim}14$ years (15.3%) and over 15 years (29.6%) showed highest ratio and there were many non-reply (39.4%) and in addition, 67.6% replied as own house and 14.3% as lease on deposit base in question of residence type. 2. Subjects showed high ratio of subjective symptom appeal of 62.79% and many cases (50.23%) appealed 1 or 2 symptoms. Symptom by body region was 29.8% (waist), 27% (shoulder), 21.2% (knee), 15.5% (neck), 9.5% (ankle), 8.1% (wrist) and 5.0% (elbow) in order. In case of relationship with general characteristics, female comparing with male, non-residence of own house, subjects with lower education level and employment period of $10{\sim}14$ years showed higher appeal rate and kind of symptoms than others. Therefore, it was concluded that rate of musculoskeletal symptom appeal have close relationship with gender, level of living, education level, age and employment period. 3. In case of severe pain of upper body except waist and ankle, it was appealed in both or right side and it means that upper body pain is originated from right side and right region pain is transited to both region pain. In addition, there was 39.41% of non-reply to existence of right-left region pain and therefore, it was evaluated that, in may cases, there was no awareness of their own symptom condition even on subjective symptom. 4. Degree of pain was, as pain over middle level, evaluated as 2.79 on full mark of 4.0 and in order of waist (2.97), ankle (2.83), knee (2.82), wrist (2.82), neck (2.79), shoulder (2.70) and elbow (2.62). In addition, 71.97% appealed $2{\sim}3$ cases for the latest 1 week. Owing to subjective symptom, 54.95% drop into hospital or pharmacy, 10.32% made temporary retirement or absence, 7.99% transferred into more comfortable duty and $39.4{\sim}54%$ experienced one or more managing mentioned above. 5. Fulfillment of health promotion life style of subjects was evaluated on full mark of 4.0 and total score was 2.63. Average mark of each area was personal relationship (3.05), self-realization (2.92), stress management (2.63), health control (2.48), physical exercise (2.19) and nutrition management (2.19) and personal relationship was highest and physical exercise and nutrition management were lowest. As general characteristics influencing health promotion life style, gender, residence style and employment period showed significant difference. Male showed higher mark than female and showed higher mark in order of own house, others, lease on deposit base, monthly rent. Subjects with longer employment period showed higher mark with significant difference. 6. Accounting of factor influencing each area of health promotion life style, self-realization showed significance in marriage status, income, residence style and education level and health control in age, residence style and employment period. Physical exercise showed significant difference in gender, age, residence style and employment period and nutrition in gender, age, residence style and employment period. Stress management showed significant difference in residence style and employment period and however not in personal relationship. 7. Health promotion life style relating with existence and kind of pain showed significant difference in all area except personal relationship area. In absence of pain, there was statistically significant high score in all area even in total health promotion life style and all area. Accounting of kind of pain, cases of $1{\sim}2$ kinds of pain and $5{\sim}6$ kinds of pain showed relatively high score and it was lower than mark of subject stated absence of pain. 8. Subjects appeal symptom were classified by symptom region and difference of total and each areas were evaluated. General area (p=0.002), self-realization (p=0.012), health management (p=0.023), physical exercise (p=0.028), nutrition management (p=0.028) and stress control (p=0.001) showed statistically significant difference and not in personal relationship area. Especially, elbow, shoulder and neck area marked high and group appealed pain of knee, arm and elbow, foot and ankle marked low. Based on those results, subjective symptom should be accounted seriously in diagnosis of occupational musculoskeletal disease of laborer and among subjective symptom, general characteristics of gender, age, condition of living, education level and employment period make effect. Generally subject appeal symptom marked lower than subject without symptom appeal and it means that life management of subject appealing musculoskeletal pain make important role in management and treatment of occupational musculoskeletal disease.

  • PDF