• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.405-416
• /
• 2021

The safety speed 5030 policy, which is currently being implemented nationwide, tends to increase citizens' dissatisfaction due to reduced mobility and inconvenience. In order to successfully promote the Safety Speed 5030 policy, it is important to collect various opinions of citizens who use roads by deviating from quantitative policy evaluation criteria such as traffic accidents and traffic speed. Therefore, in this study, citizens who use roads were classified into a driver group and a non-driver group, and civic consciousness analysis such as adequacy evaluation of speed limit, satisfaction evaluation of road service quality (MDS), and importance-satisfaction analysis (IPA) was conducted. As a result of the analysis of civic consciousness, in particular, satisfaction with mobility, economy, and environment was low. Accordingly, it was intended to promote the successful implementation of the Safety Speed 5030 policy by presenting measures to improve the speed limit and quality of road service for roads with low satisfaction.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.41 no.5
• /
• pp.559-569
• /
• 2021

In this study, using structural equation modeling, a policy acceptance evaluation model was developed to evaluate the service items of roadsthat affect the acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy. The relationship of influence on policy acceptance was found to be as follows: In the driver group, satisfaction with mobility (0.411), economy (0.217), safety (0.181), and environment (0.089) are in the order of top priority; and in the non-driver group, satisfaction with safety (0.466), mobility (0.223), environment (0.194), and economy (0.111) are in the order of top priority. From these results, in order to increase acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy, it is necessary to differentiate the provision of services according to the characteristics of each road user type. This infers it is important to improve mobility for roads with a high hierarchy mainly used by driver groups, and to improve safety for roads with low hierarchy mainly used by non-driver groups. Therefore, the evaluation model for acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy suggested in this study can be used as basic data for activating the Safety Speed 5030 policy in the future by reflecting the qualitative evaluation of users.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2021

The speed change lane is installed at the point where the roads are connected on the urban roads, reducing the relative speed to facilitate traffic communication. However, in the case of the speed limit of 30 km/h in accordance with the implementation of the safe speed "5030" in the city, the standard is ambiguous, and there are criticisms about the installation of the transmission lane. This study conducted a pilot study on the traffic patterns of the speed change lanes, focusing on the section where the safe speed "5030" policy was scheduled to be implemented after theoretical consideration of the speed change lanes. After on-site investigation, as a result of analyzing the traffic pattern according to the travel speed of the main road according to road conditions and traffic conditions, the effectiveness of the speed change lane according to the safety speed "5030" was analyzed. In this study, the installation criteria for speed change lane by speed were presented. The criteria is that "speed change lanes should not be installed when the speed limit is 30 km/h, and speed change lanes should be installed when the speed limit is 50 km/h." The criteria will be considered as a reference when establishing engineering standards for connection of other facilities in urban areas in the future. It is expected that unnecessary restrictions on individuals' exercise of private property rights will be minimized, smooth traffic flow and secure safety by the installation of speed change lanes and expansion of turning radius.