• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 1999.07g
• /
• pp.3039-3041
• /
• 1999

본 연구에서는 과수원에서 사용되는 농약살포용 스피드 스프레이어기(SS기)의 자율주행을 위한 시스템을 개발하였다. 과거의 SS기의 자율주행을 실현한 시스템은 대부분 고가의 장비를 사용하거나 실용성이 결여된 점에 비추어 본 연구에서는 실용가능성에 역점을 두어서 저가의 실용 가능한 시스템을 구성하고자 하였다. 개발된 자율주행 시스템의 특징으로는 1) 하드웨어 시스템을 고성능 프로세서를 이용하여 중앙집중식으로 개발 하였으며 2) 초음파센서의 보정 및 보강을 통해서 오차를 최소화하는 알고리즘을 개발하였으며 3) 현장에서 사용시 진동등의 noise에 강한 robust 시스템을 구성하였으며 4) 자율주행을 제어하기 위해서 퍼지알고리즘을 도입한 지능제어를 실현하였다.

• The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.300-304
• /
• 2016

The aim of this study were to evaluate the exposure level of pyrethroid pesticide according to spraying machine type. The urinary metabolites of pyrethroid pesticide in apple farmers were analyzed to determine the exposure level of pyrethroid pesticide. The result shows that, the spraying volume was greater in SS sprayer group than in power sprayer group. But multi variate analysis which adjust spraying volume and field area, there were no difference of urinary metabolites between two sprayer machine. To make more accurate model of pesticide exposure, the factors influencing pesticide exposure should be determined and further study should be done.

• The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.281-288
• /
• 2007

This research was carried out to propose the Korean method for estimating the agricultural occupational pesticide exposure level in orchard. The UK-POEM (UK-Predictive Operator Exposure Model) was proposed as a bench-marking model and analysed its performance properties. To extrapolate the Korean agricultural conditions, application equipment, application method, work rate per day, application volume and spraying time of pesticide was surveyed for Korean 204 orchard farmhouse. This survey indicate that the major application equipments are speed sprayer(64.9%) and motor sprayer(33.9%). When they spayed the pesticide with a speed sprayer, they worked for more than 4 hours on area of 4 ha per day. In case of using motor sprayer, they worked for more than 4 hours on area of 1 ha. Based on the above survey result, Korean method for estimating the pesticide exposure level of agricultural worker was proposed finally.

• The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.50-59
• /
• 2013

This study was performed in order to assess the risk of korean orchard worker due to pesticide exposure. The amount of pesticide exposure was calculated based on the informations of 97 kind of items that are used the form of a spraying in Korean orchard. The risks of these pesticides were assessed to compare the exposure amount with AOEL (acceptable operator exposure level) which was released form developed countries. When the operator sprayed pesticides using speed sprayer, 74.2% of pesticide items showed the risk for operator if the operator have not worn the personal protective equipment (PPE), and 42.3% of pesticide items showed the risk for operator if the operator have worn the PPE. In case of using motor sprayer, 64.1% of pesticide items showed the risk for operator if the operator have not worn the PPE, and 19.4% of pesticide items showed the risk for operator if the operator have worn the PPE. This result was indicated that the risk of pesticide against the operator was very high in korean orchard operator.

• Journal of agricultural medicine and community health
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.249-263
• /
• 2004

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to establish the exposure monitoring method of chlorpyrifos and chlorothalonil application to pear and field red pepper by vehicle-mounted sprayer, hand-held sprayer and to assess the risk. Methods and Results: Chlorpyrifos met all of requirements of sampling and analysis method(U.S. EPA), but chlorothalonil met only dermal patch method. Potential dermal and inhalation exposure was evaluated in 42 farmers. Compared with the hand-held sprayer application, vehicle mounted sprayer demonstrated producing relatively lower dermal exposure levels with statistical significance. In dermal exposure during hand-held application, there is no significant difference between pear and red pepper. Conclusions: This results show that application method is the main factor of dermal exposure. There was no statistically significant difference between each group of respiratory exposure level. The margin of safety (MOS) was calculated to assess the risk of pesticide exposure. All Chlorpyrifos MOS values are lower than 0.2, which mean working conditions are unsafe. In order to protect farmers, big efforts to control exposure are needed.