• Title/Summary/Keyword: SAE J 1634 method, Single cycle test

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

A Comparison of the Fuel Economy Test Method on Electric Vehicles (EVs) (전기자동차 연비시험 방법 비교)

  • LEE, MIN-HO;KIM, SUNG-WOO;KIM, KI-HO
    • Transactions of the Korean hydrogen and new energy society
    • /
    • v.28 no.3
    • /
    • pp.287-294
    • /
    • 2017
  • EVs manufacturers typically target a range of 300 km on a fully charged battery. Many studies have been conducted to improve these disadvantages. As a results, the mileage of EVs is expected to increase significantly. However, as the distance traveled by EVs increases, current test method (SCT) have many difficulties. The biggest problem is that it takes a lot of time to test an EVs and greatly increases the error rate during the test period. In order to solve these problems, this paper discusses the fuel economy test method of EVs for energy efficiency and mileage. The comparison of test methods was achieved by chassis dynamometer test about EVs. These review of test methods are intended to both improve testing efficiency and provide a practical testing methodology that can be easily adapted to accommodate future testing enhancements. In conclusion, the results of MCT mode and SCT mode comparison show similar results within 3 %, confirming that the test method is appropriate. Also, as the CSCM distance becomes shorter in the MCT mode, the mileage becomes longer and the fuel economy becomes lower. As a result, the error from the SCT test results is expected to increase. In order to minimize the error of SCT measurement fuel economy, it is recommended to maximize the CSCM driving distance. However, since the timing of the EOT is not clearly known, it is reasonable to define the allowable range of the CSCE to be within 20 % of the MCT total mileage.