• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.39-48
• /
• 2012

Risk Assessment to list possible safety disasters and their probability and severity is the starting point for effective safety management on construction project site. However, the safety managers in owners, construction supervisors, contractors, and sub-contractors still have difficulties in judging the priorities of safety activities and preparing responses to each potential safety disasters. Therefore, this study aimed to suggest a systematic method in assessing safety risk prior to commencement with the agreement of stakeholders. FMECA(failure mode effects and criticality analysis) was selected as a main assessment tool and it was modified according to the characteristics of construction projects and trades. Each risk is, firstly, evaluated with occurrence probability, possible loss and impacts to projects, and detections, and then risk priority number(RPN) is calculated. Subsequently, the managers of each stakeholder discuss the types, timing, and responsibilities of responses as a group decision-making process.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.78-87
• /
• 2022

In the risk assessment of urban railway systems, a hazard log is created by identifying hazards from accident and failure data. Then, based on a risk matrix, evaluators analyze the frequency and severity of the occurrence of the hazards, conduct the risk assessment, and then establish safety measures for the risk factors prior to risk control. However, because subjective judgments based on the evaluators' experiences affect the risk assessment results, a more objective and automated risk assessment system must be established. In this study, we propose a risk assessment model in which an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), which is combined in artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy inference system (FIS), is applied to the risk assessment of urban railway systems. The newly proposed model is more objective and automated, alleviating the limitations of risk assessments that use a risk matrix. In addition, the reliability of the model was verified by comparing the risk assessment results and risk control priorities between the newly proposed ANFIS-based risk assessment model and the risk assessment using a risk matrix. Results of the comparison indicate that a high level of accuracy was demonstrated in the risk assessment results of the proposed model, and uncertainty and subjectivity were mitigated in the risk control priority.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.517-526
• /
• 2018

Purpose: This study compared nursing frequency, nursing time, and nursing intervention priorities depending on the method of neonatal induced hypothermia. Methods: We observed 15 neonatal subjects receiving therapeutic hypothermia for 3 days each. Forty-five nurses experienced with nursing neonatal patients under therapeutic hypothermia provided responses about nursing intervention priorities. Analyses with the chi-square, the Fisher exact test, the paired t-test, the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were performed on the data using SAS version 9.4. Results: The frequency of nursing activities was higher for selective head therapeutic hypothermia (SHTH) than for systemic therapeutic hypothermia (STH), and nursing time was also significantly longer. In terms of nursing intervention priorities, there were priority differences in "risk for ineffective thermoregulation" and "risks for impaired skin integrity" for SHTH compared to STH. Conclusion: Since SHTH for neonatal therapeutic hypothermia requires more nursing time and frequent nursing activities than STH, STH is therefore recommended if the therapeutic efficacy is similar. Appropriate nursing personnel should be allocated for neonatal SHTH nursing. Nurses should be aware of nursing interventions for therapeutic hypothermia as the priorities are different for different methods of neonatal therapeutic hypothermia.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.571-582
• /
• 2019

Purpose: To develop a risk metric for failure cause that can help determine the action priority of each failure cause in FMEA considering time sequence of cause- failure- detection. Methods: Assuming a quadratic loss function the unfulfilled mission period, a risk metric is obtained by deriving the failure time distribution. Results: The proposed risk metric has some reasonable properties for evaluating risk accompanied with a failure cause. Conclusion: The study may be applied to determining action priorities among all the failure causes in the FMEA sheet, requiring further studies for general situation of failure process.

• 터널과지하공간
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 CAES 저장 공동의 운영단계에서 발생할 가능성이 있는 리스크를 분석 및 평가하고, 가장 높은 리스크 수준을 가지고 있는 것으로 판명된 리스크에 대해서 화재 시나리오를 작성하였다. 운영단계에서의 리스크를 상위 리스크와 하위 리스크로 구분하였다. 상위 리스크는 '기술적 리스크', '시설 리스크', '자연재해 리스크'로 이루어져 있으며, 하위 리스크는 11개의 리스크 요인들로 구성되어 있다. 20인의 관련 분야 전문가에게 설문 조사를 실시하였으며, 설문 내용을 분석하기 위해서 ANP 모델을 적용하였다. 리스크 우선순위를 결정하기 위해서 ANP 분석 결과와 기 결정된 리스크 평가기준을 비교하였으며, 그 결과 '관리공동 내 화재 발생'이 위험도가 가장 높은 리스크로 선정되었다. '관리공동 내 화재 발생' 리스크가 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위하여 시나리오를 작성한 후 분석하였다. 3가지 종류의 시나리오를 고려하였으며, 시나리오를 분석하기 위해서 FDS 화재 해석 프로그램을 사용하였다. 해석 결과 터널 내부에서 외부로 바람이 부는 경우를 가정한 No. 3 시나리오가 연기 확산 속도가 가장 크면서 가장 빠르게 연기가 호흡 한계선 이하까지 하강하는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 운영요원이 접근터널에서 피난하는 경우 No. 3 시나리오가 가장 불리한 조건으로 판명되었다.

• Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.285-298
• /
• 2002

In Korea, no CRA (comparative risk analysis) studies have been undertaken, nor have their methodologies of such studies been established. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to establish the framework of CRA consisting of health risk, economic risk and perceived risk, and to estimate and compare these risks among the three environmental problems of air pollution, indoor air pollution and drinking water contamination, which are themselves subject to the eight sub -problems of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), regulated pollutants (representative as PM 10) and dioxins (PCDDs/PCDFs) in air pollution, indoor air pollutants (IAPs) and radon in indoor air pollution, and drinking water pollutants (DWPs), disinfection by -products (DBPs) and radionuclides in drinking water contamination in Seoul, Korea. After which, the priorities of these problems were set by individual and integrated risk. From the results, the rankings of both health risk and economical risk were in the following order: radon, PM10, IAPs, HAPs, DWPs, dioxins, DBPs, and radionuclides among the eight sub problems. On the contrary, the ranking of perceived risk was in the following order: HAPs, dioxins, radionuclides, PM10, DWPs, IAPs, Radon and then DBPs among the eight sub-problems.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.123-131
• /
• 2015

A CCTV inspection method has been widely used to assess sewer condition and performance, but Korea lacks a proper decision support system for prioritizing sewer repair and rehabilitation (R&R). The objective of this paper is to introduce the results that we have developed in the Sewer Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation Decision-making (SCARD) Program using MS-EXCEL. The SCARD-Program is based on a standardized defect score for sewer structural and hydraulic assessment. Priorities are ranked based on risk scores, which are calculated by multiplying the sewer severity scores by the environmental impacts. This program is composed of three parts, which are decision-making for sewer condition and performance assessment, decision-making for sewer R&R priority assessment, and decision-making for optimal budget allocation. The SCARD-Program is useful for decision-makers, as it enables them to assess the sewer condition and to prioritize sewer R&R within the limited annual budget. In the future, this program logic will applied to the GIS-based sewer asset management system in local governments.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2015

A CCTV inspection method has been widely used to assess sewer condition and performance, but Korea lacks a proper decision support system for prioritizing sewer repair and rehabilitation (R&R). The objective of this paper is to introduce the results that we have developed in the Sewer Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation Decision-making (SCARD) Program using MS-EXCEL. The SCARD-Program is based on a standardized defect score for sewer structural and hydraulic assessment. Priorities are ranked based on risk scores, which are calculated by multiplying the sewer severity scores by the environmental impacts. This program is composed of three parts, which are decision-making for sewer condition and performance assessment, decision-making for sewer R&R priority assessment, and decision-making for optimal budget allocation. The SCARD-Program is useful for decision-makers, as it enables them to assess the sewer condition and to prioritize sewer R&R within the limited annual budget. In the future, this program logic will applied to the GIS-based sewer asset management system in local governments.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.229-239
• /
• 2018

본 논문은 기존의 CCTV가 가진 문제점을 분석하고, 클라우드 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 IP-CCTV를 사용할 때, 보안문제점에 대하여 논한다. 클라우드 서비스 제공과 관련된 보안 위험을 단순히 위험 현상만 제거하는 실수를 줄이기 위해서는 위험 분석과 조치에 대한 효과적인 수행 방법이 필요하다. 이에 따라, Threat Risk Modeling의 STRIDE 모델을 통하여 위협 분석을 하고, 위협 분석된 내용을 토대로 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) 방법론을 사용하여 위험 우선순위를 측정하였으며, 우선순위에 대한 적절한 해결방법이 무엇인지를 분석하였다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.851-861
• /
• 2021

This study aims to explore the specific risks in family small-medium enterprises (SMEs) and explain how they manage these risks to sustain and expand. In Indonesia, family business composes around 95 percent of all businesses and contributes about 80 percent to the country's economy. SMEs contribute approximately 57.8 percent to the nation's gross domestic product. Risk management poses challenges to the family business's survival, as family members do not take actions on risk. The assessment of risk is difficult and family businesses lack the ability to determine risk management priorities, including risk management review processes to evaluate risk, thus leading to family business failures. Applying the case study approach, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in seven family SMEs comprising fifteen informants. Additionally, a focus group discussion consisting of three experts is conducted to reaffirm the findings from the interviews, observations, and field notes. The research identified the specific risks and how the family owners strategize to safeguard against these risks such as cash flow deficiency, operations dysfunction, cultural frailty, disharmony, transgenerational entrepreneurship failure, political uncertainty, and unprofessionalism. Comprehending these risks and their strategic decisions elucidated in this research could enable the family owners and key non-family professionals to work hand-in-hand to thrive over the family business risks together. Further avenues of research regarding family business risk management are also suggested in this study.