• Clinical Endoscopy
• /
• 제56권1호
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2023

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been established as a treatment modality for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Long-term follow-up data are lacking in Western countries. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survival in a Western center. Methods: Patients undergoing ESD for ESCC were included. The analysis was performed retrospectively using a prospectively collected database. Results: R0 resection rate was 96.7% (59/61 lesions in 58 patients). Twenty-seven patients (46.6%) fulfilled the curative resection criteria (M1/M2) (group A), 11 patients (19.0%) had M3 lesions without lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (group B), and 20 patients (34.5%) had lesions with submucosal invasion or LVI (group C). Additional treatment was recommended after non-curative resection. It was not performed in 20/31 patients (64.5%), mainly because of comorbidities (75%). Twenty-nine out of 58 (50.0%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Death was related to ESCC in 17.2% (5/29) of patients. The disease-specific survival rate after curative resection was 100%. Overall survival rates after 5 years were 61.5%, 63.6% and 28.1% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The overall survival was significantly worse after non-curative resection (p=0.038). Conclusions: Non-curative resection is frequent after ESD for ESCC in Western patients. The long-term prognosis is limited and mainly determined by comorbidity. Early diagnosis and pre-interventional assessments need to be improved.

• Clinical Endoscopy
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.317-328
• /
• 2024

Background/Aims: In this meta-analysis, we studied the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Multiple databases were searched, and studies were retrieved based on pre-specified criteria until October 2022. The outcomes assessed were resection rates, procedural complications, local recurrence, metachronous tumors, and the need for surgery after ESD in IBD. Standard meta-analysis methods were followed using the random-effects model, and I²% was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies comprising 291 dysplastic lesions in 274 patients were included with a median follow-up of 25 months. The pooled en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and curative resection rates were 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9%-95.4%; I²=0%), 81.5% (95% CI, 72.5%-88%; I²=43%), and 48.9% (95% CI, 32.1%-65.9%; I²=87%), respectively. The local recurrence rate was 3.9% (95% CI, 2%-7.5%; I²=0%). The pooled rates of bleeding and perforation were 7.7% (95% CI, 4.5%-13%; I²=10%) and 5.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-8.9%; I²=0%), respectively. The rates of metachronous recurrence and additional surgery following ESD were 10% (95% CI, 5.2%-18.2%; I²=55%) and 13% (95% CI, 8.5%-19.3%; I²=54%), respectively. Conclusions: ESD is safe and effective for the resection of dysplastic lesions in IBD with an excellent pooled rate of en-bloc and R0 resection.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.400-408
• /
• 2018

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate immediate outcomes and clinical courses of patients with early gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) who underwent endoscopic resection. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients (mean age, 56.9 years; 90.0% male) who underwent endoscopic resection and were pathologically diagnosed with GCLS confined to the mucosa or to the submucosa between March 1998 and December 2017. Results: Forty GCLS lesions in 40 patients were treated using endoscopic resection. Only 4 (10%) patients received diagnosis of GCLS before endoscopic resection. Fourteen (35.0%) lesions were intramucosal cancers and 26 (65.0%) exhibited submucosal invasion. En bloc resection (97.5%) was achieved for all lesions except one, with no significant complications. The complete resection rate was 85.0% (34 of 40 lesions). After endoscopic resection, 17 patients were referred for surgery and underwent gastrectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection because of deep submucosal invasion (n=16) and misclassification as undifferentiated cancer (n=1). No LN metastasis was determined in the specimens obtained during surgery. During a mean follow-up period of 49.7 months for 23 patients without surgical treatment, no regional LN enlargements, distant metastases, or gastric cancer-related deaths were found, although 1 metachronous lesion (undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, follow-up duration: 7 months) was observed. Conclusions: In patients with early GCLS, endoscopic resection is technically feasible and has favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, endoscopic resection might represent an alternative treatment modality in patients with early GCLS with a low likelihood of LN metastasis.

• Clinical Endoscopy
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.350-363
• /
• 2024

Background/Aims: To overcome the technical limitations of classic endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), various methods have been developed. In this study, we examined the role and feasibility of clip-and-cut procedures (clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection [cc-EFTR]) for gastric GISTs. Methods: Medical records of 83 patients diagnosed with GISTs after endoscopic resection between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Moreover, clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and cc-EFTR were performed in 51 and 32 patients, respectively. The GISTs were detected in the upper third of the stomach for ESD (52.9%) and cc-EFTR (90.6%). Within the cc-EFTR group, a majority of GISTs were located in the deep muscularis propria or serosal layer, accounting for 96.9%, as opposed to those in the ESD group (45.1%). The R0 resection rates were 51.0% and 84.4% in the ESD and cc-EFTR groups, respectively. Seven (8.4%) patients required surgical treatment (six patients underwent ESD and one underwent cc-EFTR,) due to residual tumor (n=5) and post-procedure adverse events (n=2). Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resection did not experience recurrence during a median 14-month follow-up period, except for one patient in the ESD group. Conclusions: cc-EFTR displayed a high R0 resection rate; therefore, it is a safe and effective therapeutic option for small gastric GISTs.

• 대한골관절종양학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.30-37
• /
• 1995

The prognosis of parosteal osteosarcoma is better than any other malignant bone tumors, but there are many controversies in its treatment. We tried to evaluate the prognosis and the effectiveness of limb-salvage operation in the treatment of the parosteal osteosarcoma. We experienced 12 patients of conventional parosteal osteosarcoma(2 males and 10 females) from 1981 to 1991. The limb-salvage operations with wide resection margin were done in 8 patients(5 tumer prosthesis, 2 resection arthrodesis and 1 vascularized fibular transplantation), marginal en-bloc resection and amputation in 2 patients, respectively. The duration of mean follow up was 5 years and 9 months, ranging from 2 year-3 months to 11 years, except of the patient who died with metastasis 1 year 8 months after. The disease-free survival rate(DFSR) of all patients was 68% and that of the patients treated with limb-salvage operation was 88% at 7 years. The DFSR was 33% with marginal margin(3 cases) and 89% with wide margin(9 cases) at 7 years. The results were unsatisfactory in the conventional parosteal osteosarcoma treated with marginal resection. The limb-salvage operation with wide surgical margin was thought to be the treatment of choice.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.68-72
• /
• 2000

Background: The resection of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer can be performed very rarely. There has been many arguments for longterm result and therapeutic role in surgical management of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). We analyze our result of surgical re-resection of recurrent NSCLC for 10 years retrospectively. Material and Method: In the period from 1987 to 1997, 702 patients who had been confirmed for NSCLC had undergone complete resection in Seoul National University Hospital. As December 1997, 22 of these patients have been operated on the diagnosis of recurrent lung cancer. In these patients one has revealed for benign nodule at postoperative pathologic pathologic was unresectable. and two had revealed other cell type on postoperative pathologic examination. Analysis about postoperative survival rate and the factors that influence postoperative survival rate - sex, age, pathologic stage, cell type, operation adjuvant therapy after first and second operation location of recurrence disease free survival-was 59.1$\pm$10.9 year. There were 14 men and 3 women. Four patients was received radiation therpy after first opration and two patients was received postoperative chemotherapy. At first operation 2 patients was stage Ia, 8 was stage Ib, 1 was stage IIa 6 was stage IIb. Eleven patients had squamous. cell carcinoma at postoperatrive pathologic examination five had adenocarcinoma and one had bronchioalveolar carcinoma. In second operation 8 patients were received limited resection. 9 were received lobectomy or pneumonectomy. One-year survival rate was 82.4% and five-year survival rate was 58.2% Non-adjuvant therapy group after initial operation was more survived than adjuvant therapy group statistically. Conclusion: operation was more survived than adjuvant therapy group statistically. Conclusion : Operation was feasible treatment modality for re-resectable non-small cell lung cancer. But we cannot rule out possibility of double primary lung cancer for them. Postoperative prognostic factor was adjuvant therapy or nor after first oepration but further study of large scale is needed for stastically more valuable result.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.131-135
• /
• 2020

Background: Resection of the radial head is a surgical indication for comminuted radial head fracture in which internal fixation is inaccessible. Some complications from the surgery can alter the function of the patient's elbow. The objective of this study was to assess functional outcome of the elbow after resection of the radial head. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was performed with patients who underwent radial head resection between 2008 and 2018. Elbow function was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) for 11 patients comprising three women and eight men. The mean follow-up was 47.6 months. The mean age was 41±10.3 years. Results: Nine patients had a stable and painless elbow. The mean extension-flexion arc was 97.73°±16.03°. The mean values of pronation and supination were 76.8° and 74.5°, respectively. The mean MEPI score was 83.2 points, and restoration of overall function was achieved in 81% of the cases. Poor function was noted in one in 10 that presented with a terrible triad. Conclusions: Resection of the radial head restored elbow functionality at a rate of 81%, which was a good outcome for patients.

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2001

Objectives: We studied what is the role of elective carotid artery resection in the management of advanced cervical metastatic cancer. Materials and Methods: 5 patients with elective carotid artery resection in advanced metastatic cervical cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The patients underwent complete neuroradiologic evaluation, including CT/MRI. angiography, duplex doppler, balloon occlusion test with EEG, and brain SPECT for determination of compatible collateral circulation after carotid artery resection. Results: Perioperative complication were appeared in 2 patients those were middle cerebral arterial infarction and mediastinal bleeding. Postoperative mortality rate was 20%. 4 patients recurred within 1 year. Conclusion: Preoperative collateral study rarely provide whether resection carotid artery or not. Elective carotid artery resection cannot provide locoregional control of tumor and don't promote survival.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.100-105
• /
• 2001

Purpose: In the UICC staging system, stage IV contains not only those patients with distant metastasis but also patients with far advanced T and N status but without distant metastasis. We investigated the prognostic factors of stage IV gastric carcinoma patients without distant metastasis after curative resection. Materials and Methods: 190 stage IV gastric carcinoma patients without distant metastasis were reviewed after curative resection. Results: Male sex, distal third location, Borrmann type III, IV and histologically undifferentiated type were common. 5 year survival rate of the 190 patients was $22.2\%$. Depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis did not influence survival. The lymph node ratio (positive lymph node / retrieved lymph node) and combined resection affected survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Combined resection and positive lymph node ratio were the independent prognostic factors in the patients with stage IV gastric carcinoma who underwent curative resection.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.125-129
• /
• 2023

Appropriate sedation and analgesia are crucial for successful endoscopic procedures, patient safety, and satisfaction. Endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal tumors requires a deep sedation level because the procedure is lengthy and induces moderate to severe pain. Continuous patient consciousness assessment and vigilant vital signs monitoring are required for deep sedation. General anesthesia may unintentionally occur even during deep sedation for endoscopic tumor resection, which may cause unexpected complications, especially in high-risk patients. Previous studies have revealed that general anesthesia increases the en bloc resection rate and decreases the procedure time. Complications, such as perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and cardiopulmonary instability, including hypoxemia, hypotension, and arrhythmia, occurred more frequently in patients with sedation compared to those with general anesthesia. Therefore, general anesthesia demonstrated potential benefits in endoscopic treatment results and patient safety. General anesthesia should be considered a useful alternative for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic gastrointestinal tumor resection. However, more high-quality prospective studies are required to determine the safety and effectiveness of general anesthesia in endoscopic upper gastrointestinal tumor resection because most studies comparing general anesthesia and sedation in these procedures have been retrospectively conducted and the results were inconsistent.