• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.109-124
• /
• 2023

This study aims to apply the concept of regulatory stringency to the regulatory sandbox with a fresh perspective. The regulatory sandbox is a system that gives opportunities under certain conditions to new technologies or businesses that have not been launched due to inadequacy or insufficiency in legal systems. Previous research on regulatory sandboxes has mainly focused on discussions about their impact on specific technologies or business domains. This study attention to the results according to the evaluations. Among them, whether special cases for demonstration can evolve into official permission has garnered significant attention. For this study, among the cases that passed the regulatory sandbox evaluation from February, 2019, to December, 2022, 162 cases in the field of ICT convergence were selected. The evaluation results were classified into three groups 'positive interpretation (Fast Track)', 'temporary permission', and 'special case for demonstration.' Each case was assigned to one of the three groups. Through the comparative analysis, the common characteristics and differences were summarized. Then, this study explored improvement measures to pass a less restrictive regulatory sandbox. The analysis of the cases revealed that the differences in each evaluation result were attributed to variations in the technological characteristics and user protection features. Considering these differences, as well as the higher weight and importance of the preparation stage for sandbox application, this study suggested a three-step approach to prepare for temporary permission and positive interpretation rather than special case for demonstration. In addition, this thesis discussed the policy limitations of the regulatory sandbox mechanism in South Korea and the limitations of the current study. Hopefully, the results of this study would be beneficial to individuals and companies, particularly venture companies and startups seeking to develop new technologies or businesses and utilize regulatory sandboxes.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 미국 주정부의 환경정책과 축산업의 규모 및 입지 선정과의 관계에 대한 분석을 시도하였다. 분석은 업종별이 아닌 소규모, 중규모 그리고 대규모의 세 가지 규모별로 미국의 487B 주의 29년 자료를 이용한 Panel 분석을 이용하였다. 결론을 보면 일반적으로 축산엽에 대한 규제는 축산업의 구조변화에 기인한 것으로 판단된다. 산업부문으로부터 외부효과를 정부정책의 틀 안에서 내재화하기 위한 노력인 것이다. 그러나 단순히 제도의 존재 여부는 산업부문의 행위에 결정적인 영향을 주지 못하며 주정부가 규제에 대한 집행의사를 가질 때에만 영향을 줄 수 있었다. 그러나 산업부문의 급격한 구조변화가 있는 경우 주정부의 제도 존재 여부도 영향력이 있는 것으로 판단된다. 특히 축산규모에 따라 그 영향이 달랐으며 대규모 농가가 소규모 농가보다 민감하게 반응하는 것으로 나타났다.