• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.24-31
• /
• 2004

목적 : 직장암 수술 후 재발성 직장암과 수술 후 섬유화의 수소 MRS의 소견의 차이가 있는지 알아보고, 수소 MRS를 이용하여 두 질환의 감별이 가능한지 분석하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 직장암 수술 후 직장 주위에 종괴를 보인 25명을 대상으로 수소 MRS를 분석하였다 이중 11예는 재발성 직장암이고 14예는 수술 후 섬유화 였다. 모든 대상은 생검을 통하여 확진 하였다. 두 군의 수소 MRS의 그래프의 스펙트럼이 어떤 모양으로 다른지 분석하였다. 두 군에서의 1.6-4.1 ppm 대 lipid (0.9-1.6 ppm) [P (1.6-4.1ppm)/P(0.9-1.6 ppm)]의 비율을 각각 계산하였고, 두 군의 결과의 차이를 비교하였다 또한 수소 MRS에 의한 이 비율을 이용하여 두 군의 감별에 대한 민감도와 특이도를 분석하였다. 결과 : 수술 후 섬유화 군에서의 지방의 양이 재발성 직장암 군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 감소되었다. 1.6-4.1 ppm /0.9-1.6ppm의 비율이 수술 후 섬유화 군에서 lipid peak의 감소로 인해 직장암 군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높았으며 두 값의 평균 및 표준 편차는 각각 $2.71{\pm}1.48$과 $0.29{\pm}0.11$이였다. 두 군의 감별에서 결정 수치를 0.6으로 하였을 때 민감도와 특이도가 각각 $100\%$ 였다 (11/11, 14/14). 결론 : 재발성 직장암과 수술 후 섬유화는 수소 MRS 소견 분석으로 구별이 되며 수소 MRS는 두 군의 감별진단에 새로운 방법이 될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한자기공명의과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한자기공명의과학회 2003년도 제8차 학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.96-96
• /
• 2003

To know the differences of proton MR spectroscopic features between recurrent rectal cancer and fibrosis in post-operative period, and to evaluate the possibility to discriminate recurrent rectal cancer from post-operative fibrosis by analysis of proton MR spectra.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.71-77
• /
• 2017

Purpose: Although the technical developments of radiotherapy have been remarkable, there are currently few reports on the treatment results of radiotherapy for local recurrence of rectal cancer treated with surgery alone as initial treatment in this three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy era. Thus, we retrospectively evaluated the treatment results of radiotherapy for local recurrence of rectal cancer treated with surgery alone as the initial treatment. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients who underwent radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. The dose per fraction was 2.0-3.5 Gy. Because the treatment schedule was variable, the biological effective dose (BED) was calculated. Results: Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates from the completion of radiotherapy were calculated. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year LC rates were 51.5%, 24.5%, 19.6%, 19.6%, and 13.1%, respectively. LC rates were significantly higher for the high BED group (${\geq}75Gy_{10}$) than for the lower BED group (<$75Gy_{10}$). All patients who reported pain achieved pain relief. The duration of pain relief was significantly higher for the high BED group than for the lower BED group. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS rates were 82.6%, 56.5%, 45.2%, 38.7%, and 23.2%, respectively. There was a trend toward higher OS rates in with higher BED group compared to lower BED group. Conclusion: For patients with unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with surgery alone, radiotherapy is effective treatment. The prescribed BED should be more than $75Gy_{10}$, if the dose to the organ at risk is within acceptable levels.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 1988

가톨릭 의과대학 강남성모병원 방사선치료실에서는 1983년 4월부터 1987년 12월까지 4년 8개월 동안에 국소 재발성 또는 진행된 직장암환자 46예의 외부 방사선 치료를 실시하였다. 방사선 치료는 6MV선형가속기를 사용하였으며 전후 2대문조사 및 4문조사를 혼합 사용하였고, 매일 $160\~180cGy$색 주 5회 분할조사하여 총 $4,500\~6,000rad/5\~7$주를 시도하였다. 필요시는 수술창 및 회음부에 격일로 Bolus를 사용하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었기에 보고하는 바이다. 1. 총 46명중 남자 25명, 여자는 21명이었고, 연령 분포는 22세부터 79세까지였다(중앙연령 : 54세). 2. 수술 후 재발된 직장암이 28예였고, 수술 불가능한 경우가 18예였다. 3. 재발된 예 28명에서 Astler-Coiler's Modification of Duke's Method 분류상 C2가 20명이었는데 그중 12명이 수술 후 12개월 내에 재발하였다. Bl 명기에서는 24개월 내 재발한 예는 전혀 없었다. 4. 방사선 치료에 대한 반응으로 통증을 주소로 했던 30명중 22명$(73\%)$에서, 종괴를 주소로 한 14명중 12명$(86\%)$에서, 출혈을 주소로 한 22명 중 17명$(77\%)$에서 각각 반응을 보였다. 5. 합병증은 건성 쪼는 습성 피부탈락과 홍반성 색소침착, 요도-방광염이 $61\%,\;35\%,\;17\%$에서 각각 관찰되었고, 2예에서는 수술을 요하는 장유착이 있었다. 6. 수술 후 2년과 3년 생존율은 각각 $43\%,\;22\%$였고, 방사선 치료 후 2년 생존율은 $13\%$였다.

• 대한방사선치료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한방사선치료학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.23-26
• /
• 2005

재발한 vulva tumor의 근접 치료에 있어서 정상조직의 장애와 tumor volume내의 dose uniformity는 치료성적에 매우 중요한 요인이다. 이를 개선하기 위하여 modified MUPIT applicator를 제작하여 modified MUPIT applicator의 적용에 대한 유용성을 평가하고자 한다. modified MUPIT applicator는 template, cylinder, interstitial needle로 구성되었으며, tumor volume을 정하기 위하여 CT를 시행하였다. CT image를 이용하여 interstitial needle의 삽입 위치를 확인하고 수술실에서 template 를 치료 부위에 고정을 시키고 cylinder를 vaginal cavity에 삽입한 후 interstitial needle을 tumor volume 내에 삽입 하였다. tumor volume내에서 interstitial needle의 정확한 위치를 확인하기 위하여 CT를 시행하였으며 orthogonal film을 이용하여 computer planning을 실시하였다. daily tumor dose는 600 cGy, BID로 3000 cGy를 조사하였으며 치료 시 rectal dose를 평가하기 위하여 TLD를 이용하여 anal verge를 기준으로 5개 지점에서 rectal dose를 측정하였다. rectal dose는 34.1 cGy, 57.1 cGy, 103.8 cGy, 162.7 cGy, 165.7 cGy로 측정되었으며 EBRT(whole pelvis RT), ICR과 overlap되는 지점은 34.1 cGy, 57.1 cGy로 매우 우수하게 평가되었다. 결론적으로 자체 제작한 modified MUPIT applicator 사용하여 interstitial brachytherapy를 시행함으로써 EBRT로 cover하기 어려운 환자의 tumor volume내에서 irregularity를 효율적으로 극복할 수 있었고 우수한 rectal dose 분포를 통하여 rectal complication의 발생 확률을 현저히 감소시킬 수 있었다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권10호
• /
• pp.4295-4299
• /
• 2014

Background: Surgery offers the only potential for cure and long-term survival of recurrence of rectal cancer. Few studies about laparoscopic recurrent lesion resection have been reported. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Data for 42 patients with recurrence of rectal cancer were collected retrospectively. Of the 42 patients, 22 underwent laparoscopic surgery (LR group) and 20 received open surgery (OR group). Outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results: Operation time in LR group was shorter compared with the OR group ($164.6{\pm}27.7min$ vs $203.0{\pm}45.3min$); intra-operative blood loss was $119.7{\pm}44.4ml$ and $185.0{\cdot}94.0ml$ in LR group and OR group, respectively (p<0.001); time to first flatus in LR group was shorter than in OR group, and the difference was statistically significant ($2.6{\pm}0.8$ days vs $3.1{\pm}0.8$ days, p=0.013); hospital stay in the LR and OR groups was $8.6{\pm}1.3$ days and $9.8{\pm}2.2$ days; 3-year survival rates in the LR and OR groups were 44.4% and 42.8% (p=0.915) and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 36.4% and 30.0%, respectively (p=0.737). Conclusions: Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection is safe and feasible for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 1993

Total of 53 patients of unresectable and recurrent rectal cancer treated with neutron beam during the period from Oct.1987 to Apr.1992 were analyzed. Dose fractionation for the neutron only group was 1.5 Gy per fraction,3 fraction per week,21 Gy/41/2 wks for 42 patients out of 53 ($76{\%}$). Neutron only but modified fractionation schedule ($10{\%}$ more or less of total dose) was applied for 9 patients, and mixed beam (neutron boost) was for 4 patients, Complete tumor response was obtained in 40 patients ($76{\%}$, response rate). Local control rate was 28 out of 53 ($53{\%}$). Statistically significant better prognostic factors for local control were age below 49 years old (15/22, $68{\%}$) than above 50 years old (13/31, $42{\%}$), male (20/32, $63{\%}$) than female (8/21, $38{\%}$), tumor size less than 5 cm and non-metastatic (16/24, $67{\%}$) than size more than 5 cm or metastatic (12/29, $41{\%}$). Major complication had developed in 7 patients ($13{\%}$). Two year overall survival rate by Kaplan-Meier method was $30{\%}$, but it was rised to, $47{\%}$ when the turner was less than 5 cm non-metastatic.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.289-293
• /
• 1988

방사선 치료는 악성 종양의 치료에서 국소 치료의 효과를 높이기 위한 수술 전후의 보조치료로서, 혹은 수술 불가능한 암, 잔여암, 또는 재발암의 치료로서 널리 사용되어 왔으며 외부 방사선 치료, 동위원소를 사용한 자입치료 등에 의한 장기간의 국소 치료효과 및 증상의 호전에 대한보고는 많다. 그러나 수술전후의 방사선 요법과 수술을 병행한 직장암 환자에서의 치료후의 재발은 외과적 치료가 대부분에서 불가능하여 외부 방사선 요법, 화학요법 등이 증상판화의 목적으로 사용되어 왔으나 강내 조사의 보고는 거의 없다. 영남대학교 치료방사선과에서는 수술전 경사에서 수술 불가능으로 판명되어 수술전 방사선 치료를 받은 후 개복 하였으나 절제가 불가능하였던 환자에서 발생한 누도(fistula tract)를 따라 재발된 직장암 환자에서 강내 치료를 실시하여 매우 빠른 증세의 호전을 경험하였기에 문헌 고찰과 함께 보고하는 바이다

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.235-246
• /
• 1988

A total of 93 patients with rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy at department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center between January 1974 and December 1983 are retrospectively analysed. The patients are divided into three groups as follows: I. Postoperative radiotherapy, II. Postoperative recurrent, III. Unresectable or Inoperable group. In postoperative radiotherapy group, overall 5 year survival rate is $34.8\%$ and prognostic factors are presence of obstruction and degree of differentiation. In postoperative recurrent group, overall 2 year survival rate is $7.4\%$ with median survival of 13 months and prognostic factors are RT responsiveness and sex, and the local failure rate is $22.7\%$. In unresectable or inoperable group, overall 2 year survival rate is $19.8\%$ with median survival of 12.6 months and prognostic factors are RT responsiveness and RT dose. The complications for RT are not significant and are acceptable in all patients.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.4857-4860
• /
• 2014

Background: Colorectal cancer is common in Iran. However our knowledge about survival of rectal cancer in our province is low. The aim of this study is to evaluate this question. Materials and Methods: Patients with documented pathology of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid junction referred to our center from September 2004 to September 2012 were enrolled in this study. Metastatic and recurrent patients were excluded. A questionnaire including clinicopathologic parameters, quality and sequence of treatment modalities was filled in for each patient. Patients treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy were divided into standard and non-standard treatment groups, according to the sequence of treatment. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated. Mean age was 60.8 year. The median overall survival was 62 months and five year survival was 55%. TNM staging system was not possible due to (Nx) in 21 (17.6%) patients. The others were in stage I, 20 patients (16.8%), II, 35 (29%.5) and III, 43(36.1%). According to our definition only 25 patients (21%) had been treated with standard treatment and 79% had not received it. A five year survival in patients with standard treatment was 85% and in the non-standard group it was 52%.Age, sex, stage and grade of tumor did not show any significant relation to survival. Conclusions: Our study showed a five year survival of rectal cancer in our patients was about 10% lower than the rate which is reported for developed countries. Preoperative concurrent chemoradiation significantly improved local control and even overall survival.