• 제목/요약/키워드: Reading Assessment

검색결과 146건 처리시간 0.022초

북한이탈주민의 문장 읽기 억양 특성-음도범위와 청지각적 평가를 중심으로 (The characteristics of sentence reading intonations in North Korean defectors based on pitch range and an auditory-perceptual rating scale)

  • 김다미;김신희;김지성;안은솔;조용윤;양윤희;임동선
    • 말소리와 음성과학
    • /
    • 제11권3호
    • /
    • pp.9-21
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구에서는 북한이탈주민집단과 한국인집단의 운율특성을 비교하기 위하여 읽기과제(짧은글, 대화글)에서 3가지 문장 유형(평서문, 의문문, 부정문)에 따른 집단 간 음도범위와 청지각적 평가 결과의 차이가 있는지 살펴보았다. 또한, 북한이탈주민집단의 읽기과제의 3가지 문장 유형('평서문', '의문문', '부정문')의 청지각적 평가 결과와 북한이탈주민집단의 억양 자기평가 설문지의 4가지 하위유형('한국어지향도', '핸디캡정도', '한국어비유사성', '억양불만족정도')과의 상관을 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구의 대상자는 북한이탈주민집단 총 15명(여 11, 남 4)과 한국인집단 총 15명(여 11, 남 4)이다. 음향학적 평가에서 집단 간 읽기과제의 문장유형에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위해 삼원분산분석(three-way mixed ANOVA), 다변량분석(multivariate analysis)을 실시하였고, 청지각적 측면에 대한 분석방법으로는 비모수통계인 Mann-Whitney U Test를 사용하였다. 북한이탈주민의 억양자기평가 설문지의 하위유형 4개와 청지각적 평가의 하위유형 6가지('짧은글평서문', '짧은글의문문', '짧은글부정문', '대화글평서문', '대화글의문문', '대화글부정문')의 상관관계를 확인하기 위해 피어슨의 적률상관계수(Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient)를 산출하였다. 그 결과, 읽기과제의 모든 문장유형에서 북한이탈주민집단보다 한국인집단의 음도범위가 유의미하게 컸다. 두 번째로 집단 간 읽기과제에서 3가지 문장유형에 따른 청지각적 평가 결과, 모든 문장 유형에서 한국인집단에 비해 북한이탈주민집단의 청지각적 평가 점수가 유의미하게 낮았으며, '의문문'유형에서 점수가 가장 낮았다. 마지막으로 북한이탈주민집단의 읽기과제의 3가지 문장 유형의 청지각적 평가 결과와 억양자기평가 설문지의 하위유형간의 상관을 살펴본 결과, 설문지의 4가지 하위유형 중 '한국어지향도', '핸디캡정도', '한국어비유사성'과 3가지 문장 유형 중 '의문문'에서 유의한 상관이 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해, 북한이탈주민집단과 한국인집단의 읽기과제에서의 문장유형에 따른 음성이 청지각적으로, 음향학적으로 차이를 보이고 있음을 알 수 있으며, 한국어를 지향하고, 자신의 억양으로 인한 핸디캡이 높고, 자신의 억양이 한국어와 다르다고 생각하는 북한이탈주민일수록, '의문문'에서 가장 서울말에 가깝게 말하는 것으로 평가되었음을 알 수 있다.

종이같은 E-ink 전자책의 감성연구 (Emotion Research of Paper-like E-ink E-book)

  • 박영경;이혜미;이설희
    • 감성과학
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.119-128
    • /
    • 2015
  • 전자책이 널리 보급됨에 따라 반사형 디스플레이 기반인 단말기의 수요도 증가하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 책을 읽을 수 있는 종이책, E-ink 전자책, LCD 태블릿의 감성과 독서 상태를 비교했다. E-ink 전자책에 대한 소비자의 감성반응을 알아보기 위해 감성평가 후 독서 장치의 종류에 따른 가독성, 선호도 실험을 수행하였다. 실험은 화면으로만 판단할 수 있도록 마스크를 제작했으며 컨텐츠의 내용만 다르게 설정하고 모든 조건과 환경을 동일하게 하였다. 감성반응 파악을 위한 감성어휘 실험에서는 의미분별법을 활용한 결과 LCD보다 E-ink 전자책을 종이와 가깝게 느끼는 것으로 나타났다. 가독성에 대한 선호도를 알아보기 위한 실험에서는 자기보고식 설문을 한 결과 LCD보다는 E-ink 전자책을 선호하였으며 E-ink 전자책보다는 종이를 선호하거나 비슷하게 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 사용자들이 E-ink 전자책을 종이와 비슷한 감성을 갖고 있으므로 E-ink 전자책이 종이책을 대체할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Computerized bone age estimation system based on China-05 standard

  • Yin, Chuangao;Zhang, Miao;Wang, Chang;Lin, Huihui;Li, Gengwu;Zhu, Lichun;Fei, Weimin;Wang, Xiaoyu
    • Advances in nano research
    • /
    • 제12권2호
    • /
    • pp.197-212
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic software system for bone age evaluation and to evaluate its accuracy in testing and feasibility in clinical practice. 20394 left-hand radiographs of healthy children (2-18 years old) were collected from China Skeletal Development Survey data of 1998 and China Skeletal Development Survey data of 2005. Three experienced radiologists and China-05 standard maker jointly evaluate the stages of bone development and the reference bone age was determined by consensus. 1020 from 20394 radiographs were picked randomly as test set and the remaining 19374 radiographs as training set and validation set. Accuracy of the automatic software system for bone age assessment is evaluated in test set and two clinical test sets. Compared with the reference standard, the automatic software system based on RUS-CHN for bone age assessment has a 0.04 years old mean difference, ±0.40 years old in 95% confidence interval by single reading, a 85.6% percentage agreement of ratings, a 93.7% bone age accuracy rate, 0.17 years old of MAD, 0.29 years old of RMS; Compared with the reference standard, the automatic software system based on TW3-C RUS has a 0.04 years old mean difference, a ±0.38 years old in 95% confidence interval by single reading, a 90.9% percentage agreement of ratings, a 93.2% bone age accuracy rate, a 0.16 years of MAD, and a 0.28 years of RMS. Automatic software system, AI-China-05 showed reliably accuracy in bone age estimation and steady determination in different clinical test sets.

Neuropsychological Assessment of Adult Patients with Shunted Hydrocephalus

  • Bakar, Emel Erdogan;Bakar, Bulent
    • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
    • /
    • 제47권3호
    • /
    • pp.191-198
    • /
    • 2010
  • Objective : This study is planned to determine the neurocognitive difficulties of hydrocephalic adults. Methods : The research group contained healthy adults (control group, n : 15), and hydrocephalic adults (n : 15). Hydrocephalic group consisted of patients with idiopathic aquaduct stenosis and post-meningitis hydrocephalus. All patients were followed with shunted hydrocephalus and not gone to shunt revision during last two years. They were chosen from either asymptomatic or had only minor symptoms without motor and sensorineural deficit. A neuropsychological test battery (Raven Standart Progressive Matrices, Bender-Gestalt Test, Cancellation Test, Clock Drawing Test, Facial Recognition Test, Line Orientation Test, Serial Digit Learning Test, Stroop Color Word Interference Test-TBAG Form, Verbal Fluency Test, Verbal Fluency Test, Visual-Aural Digit Span Test-B) was applied to all groups. Results : Neuropsychological assessment of hydrocephalic patients demonstrated that they had poor performance on visual, semantic and working memory, visuoconstructive and frontal functions, reading, attention, motor coordination and executive function of parietal lobe which related with complex and perseverative behaviour. Eventually, these patients had significant impairment on the neurocognitive functions of their frontal, parietal and temporal lobes. On the other hand, the statistical analyses performed on demographic data showed that the aetiology of the hydrocephalus, age, sex and localization of the shunt (frontal or posterior parietal) did not affect the test results. Conclusion : This prospective study showed that adult patients with hydrocephalus have serious neuropsychological problems which might be directly caused by the hydrocephalus; and these problems may cause serious adaptive difficulties in their social, cultural, behavioral and academic life.

Participatory Web Users’ Information Activities and Credibility Assessment

  • Rieh, Soo-Young
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제44권4호
    • /
    • pp.155-178
    • /
    • 2010
  • Assessment of information credibility is a ubiquitous human activity given that people constantly make decisions and selections based on the value of information in a variety of information seeking and use contexts. Today, people are increasingly engaging in diverse online activities beyond searching for and reading information, including activities such as creating, tagging and rating content, shopping, and listening to and watching multimedia content. The Web 2.0 environment presents new challenges for people because the burden of information evaluation is shifted from professional gatekeepers to individual information consumers. At the same time, however, it also provides unprecedented opportunities for people to use tools and features that help them to make informed credibility judgments by relying on other people's ratings and recommendations. This paper introduces fundamental notions and dimensions of credibility, and contends that credibility assessment can be best understood with respect to human information behavior because it encompasses both the level of effort people exert as well as the heuristics they employ to evaluate information. The paper reports on a survey study investigating people's credibility judgments with respect to online information, focusing on the constructs, heuristics, and interactions involved in people's credibility assessment processes within the context of their everyday life information activities. Using an online activity diary method, empirical data about people's online activities and their associated credibility assessments were collected at multiple points throughout the day for three days. The results indicate that distinct credibility assessment heuristics are emerging as people engage in diverse online activities involving more user-generated and multimedia content. A heuristic approach suggests that people apply mental shortcuts or rules of thumb in order to minimize the amount of cognitive effort and time required to make credibility judgments. The paper discusses why a heuristic approach is key to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of people's credibility assessments within the information-abundant online environment.

우레탄 폼 제조방식에 따른 작업자의 디이소시아네이트 노출수준 평가 (Diisocyanate Exposure Assessment for Polyurethane Foam Manufacturing Workers)

  • 정지연;박성욱;이지은;이광용
    • 한국산업보건학회지
    • /
    • 제22권3호
    • /
    • pp.209-216
    • /
    • 2012
  • Objectives: Polyurethanes are usually formed by the reactions of liquid diisocyanate components with liquid polyol resin components. Although polyurethanes have advantageous properties, such as their versatility, the manufacturing process generates diisocyanates, which can cause asthma and respiratory irritation in exposed workers. This study compared the differences in diisocyante concentrations between two different (molded foam and slabstock foam) polyurethane foam manufacturing methods. Materials and Methods: Active samples and direct reading samples of diisocyanates (MDI, TDI) were collected in five polyurethane foam manufacturing companies. Results: Workers' exposure concentrations of diisocyanate (GM: 4.078 ppb, range: 1.190~23.770 ppb) in a slabstock foam manufacturing company were much higher than those (GM: 0.011 ppb, range: 0.001~0.055 ppb) in molded foam manufacturing companies. The results of the direct reading samples of diisocyanate indicated that the rapid reaction zone of the slabstock foam processes emitted large amounts of diisocyanates. Conclusions: The exposure levels of diisocyanates for all molded foam workers were much lower than the occupational exposure standard (5 ppb); however, exposure levels for many slabstock foam workers exceeded the standard.

프랙탈 분석을 이용한 낭종 적출술 후 결손부 치유 양상에 관한 연구 (Study on bone healing process following cyst enucleation using fractal analysis)

  • 임헌준;이승수;김원기;온병훈;최상문;오세리;민승기;이준
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제37권6호
    • /
    • pp.477-482
    • /
    • 2011
  • Introduction: Bone regeneration of cystic defects of the jaws after a cyst treatment requires lengthy healing periods. Generally, the bony changes are observed periodically through a visual radiographic reading as well as by the clinical opinion and radiographic images (panorama, periapical view), but it is difficult to compare the objective bony changes using only the radiographic density. In addition, it is difficult to observe minute bony changes through a visual radiographic reading, which can lead to a subjective judgment. This study exmined the bone density after the enucleation of a jaw cyst by fractal analysis. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with a cystic lesion on the jaw were assessed. Panoramic radiographs were taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after cyst enucleation. The images were analyzed by fractal analysis. Results: The mean fractal dimensions increased immediately after surgery and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The postoperative 6 and 12 months fractal dimension was similar to the controls. Conclusion: Fractal analysis was used to overcome the limit of a subjective reading during an assessment of bone regeneration after cyst enucleation.

국제 학업성취도 평가(PISA)의 독서영역과 AASL의 21세기 학습자 기준 비교에 관한 연구 (The Comparative Analysis of PISA Reading Domain and AASL Standards for the 21st-Century Learner)

  • 이병기
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제43권3호
    • /
    • pp.193-216
    • /
    • 2012
  • 최근 들어, 공공기관의 책무성이 강화되면서 교육기관의 교육 책무성이 강조되고 있다. 따라서 대부분의 국가에서는 교육 책무성을 증명하기 위해서 국가 수준의 학업성취도 평가는 물론 국제 학업성취도 평가(PISA)에 참여하고 있다. 교육기관의 지원을 받는 학교도서관 또한 예외가 아니어서 교육 책무성을 요구받고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 PISA의 독서영역과 AASL의 21세기 학습자 기준과 비교하여 학교도서관이 PISA의 학업성취도와 상관관계가 있음을 규명하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 PISA 2009의 독서 리터러시 영역과 PISA 설문지를 분석 대상으로 삼았다. 연구 결과, PISA의 설문지에는 학교도서관 관련 요소를 상당수 포함하고 있으며, PISA의 독서 리터러시 영역은 AASL의 21세기 학습자 기준과 일치하고 있음을 확인하였다.

장애인을 위한 한국어능력시험(TOPIK) 운영 방법에 대한 연구 - 시각장애인 응시자를 중심으로 - (Research on Management of Test of Proficiency in Koeran(TOPIK) for the disabled examinee)

  • 정승연;황지유
    • 한국어교육
    • /
    • 제25권1호
    • /
    • pp.169-201
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this research is to analyze the problems of the way of the 32th TOPIK(advanced)'s management for the disabled examinee and to prescribe the management of the TOPIK for them. Since the TOPIK started in 1997, the number of examinee who take it as a qualifying exam for the university entrance have gradually increased. The first disabled examinee who wants to use the result of the TOPIK for entrance into the post graduated university took the 32th TOPIK(advanced level). However, there was no examination regulations and detailed management method for the disabled. The biggest problem was the examinee could not have braille test and answer. The exam supervisor read all that is printed on the test sheet. It caused two big problems. 1) The essay question in writing test became an oral test. 2) The strategies of answering to multiple choice questions could not be used in vocabulary/grammar, writing, listening, and specially reading section. The first problem is occurred because writing and speaking have different cognitive process. The second one can be strongly related to the result in reading section. Above all, these disrupt accurate assessment of the examinee's writing and reading achievement. Therefore, this research insists the TOPIK needs to have the regulation and prescribe the management for the disabled. This research suggests 5 regulations for the blind examinee which covers the test time, supervisor, place and request of the examinee. These refer to the regulation for the disable in the other tests, such as the college scholarship ability test, TOEFL, TEPS, and a civil service exam.

대학 수업에서 누적 동료평가 점수를 활용한 성적 산출 방법의 타당성 (The validity of using cumulative peer assessed scores for final grades in college courses)

  • 배수정;박주용
    • 인지과학
    • /
    • 제27권2호
    • /
    • pp.221-245
    • /
    • 2016
  • 동료평가 (peer assessment)란 통상 교수자가 주관하는 평가를 학생들로 하여금 서로에 대해 하도록 하는 활동을 가리킨다. 동료평가는 고등교육에서 글쓰기를 훈련시키기 위한 도구 혹은 배운 지식을 적용하거나 확장하는 학습 활동을 위한 도구로 사용된다. Park(2016)은 최근 동료평가를 예습 활동의 한 부분으로 확장하는 방안을 제안하였다. 학생들은 매주의 수업에 앞서 스스로 공부하고, 공부한 내용을 바탕으로 하여 대답할 수 있는 질문에 대해 한 페이지 글을 쓰고 다른 학생들의 글을 평가하였다. 본 연구에서는, 이 시스템을 S 대학의 학부수업에 두 학기에 걸쳐 적용한 결과가 분석되었다. 학생들 간의 채점 신뢰도와, 학생들의 채점 결과와 교수자에 의한 최종 보고서 평가 간의 상관이 분석되었다. 매주의 동료평가에서 학생들이 부여한 점수간의 신뢰도는 그리 높지 않았지만, 이들이 누적된 점수와 교수가 평가한 기말 보고서 점수간의 상관은 두 수업 모두에서 유의미하게 높았다. 논의에서는 이 결과를 바탕으로 대학에서 예습을 위한 동료평가의 결과를 성적에 반영하는 방안의 확장 가능성이 다루어졌다.