• 조명전기설비학회논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 신뢰도 기반 유지보수(RCM : Reliability-Centered Maintenance) 계획에 의한 발전설비의 유지보수주기를 평가하고 있다. 유지보수주기는 발전설비의 안정성 및 비용을 결정하기 위한 기준으로 활용된다. 본 논문에서는 설비 수명평가를 통해 확률분포를 이용한 확률론적 FMECA(Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis)에 대해 논하고, 국내 발전 설비 중 비교적 평균수명이 짧은 복합화력 발전소를 선정하여 유지보수 주기를 평가하였다. 발전소 유지보수 평가는 향후 구조 개편된 전력시장에서 유지보수계획 수립 방법의 유용한 지표로 활용 가능할 것이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.123-132
• /
• 2020

Currently, there are two types of trainer in Korea : basic and advanced. Both models have been in operation for more than 10 years, and compared to the early stage of operation, reliability has gradually improved and failure rates have also entered a trend of stabilization. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the maintenance period considering economic feasibility. This study investigates the three maintenance period calculation methods: NAVAIR 00-25-403 [17], DOD, U.S. [4], CERL and US Army [3], with intention to extend the maintenance period of the trainer from current 200 hours to 400 hours. In addition, the maintenance period was calculated by the three methods with actual operational data. Common standards and procedures were established to apply operational data to the existing maintenance period calculation methods, the required reliability indicators were derived, and the maintenance periods was calculated based on the results, additionally, a review on the field applicability of the three maintenance cycles was conducted. An on-site interviews were conducted with the calculation results, and 11 out of the 15 items were expected to be extended by 400 hours. It was suggested that the remaining 4 items could be extended to 400 hours by supplementing the inspection method through additional analysis such as functional analysis, inspection content verification, and site connection.