• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.237-260
• /
• 2005

This paper aims to review and analyse the introduction process of performance management system(PMS) in the R&D sector. It also examines initial problems and future policy directions of the new system. Theory part deals with various approaches to the PMS and the relation between research evaluation and performance management. The paper then describes how the PMS has been introduced in the National R&D Program by the MOST in terms of the contents of strategic goal, performance goal and performance indicator together with their development process. After this, it captures problems arising in the initial phase and then suggests how they should be solved on the ministerial and cross-ministerial level. Discussed are following topics: lack of strategic planning, grouping of heterogeneous sub-programs, duplication between the OMS and other existing research or performance evaluation. The paper finally suggests policy implications using the logic model which has been developed in a series of recent international conferences.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.39 no.3
• /
• pp.64-70
• /
• 2016

The recent development of modern weapon system by SOS (System of System) has required users to have more exact decision making. It is possible to achieve the control of complex weapon system more efficiently and effectively by increasing usability. Accordingly, many studies on graphical display have been conducted for several years in the field of HCI (Human Computer Interaction) and GUI (Graphic User Interface), starting from its design stage. Therefore, this paper focuses on evaluating the system GUI usability and analyzing several important points based on performance model, which is a tool for the evaluation and the improvement of service quality. Performance Model, the main focus of this study, reflects user expectations (which is defined as user importance in this paper). The study consists of four steps. First, 34 checklists are drawn from the existing studies related to GUI usability evaluation by using a heuristic method, and then the checklists are matched with 11 weapon system design factors. Next, the study evaluates the importance of GUI element and the usability of weapon system "A" with the checklists twice respectively. Third, the performance of user importance ($P_i$) and the performance of usability ($P_u$) are calculated by modifying a numerical formula for normalization in this step. Finally, the study compares the approach it takes and the existing usability evaluation method, demonstrating that there is a significant difference between the two methods as a result. In addition, 4 improvement factors are suggested for weapon system "A" as "Shortcut" and "Description of Abbreviation," and so on. Although it is necessary to conduct more studies for higher reliability and validity of the results, this study is meaningful considering it takes a new point of view.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2012.10a
• /
• pp.515-517
• /
• 2012

The importance of R&D project to enhance the national competitiveness continuously increase. So, it is the most important point that is evaluating the outcome and the utilizability of the project. And we need the system that can manage the evaluation of the project. In this paper, I want to discuss about the way of process management that is the evaluation of the R&D project using a system.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.71-77
• /
• 2009

Using the results of the expected busy periods for the dyadic Min(N, D) and Max(N, D) operating policies in a controllable M/G/1 queueing model, an important relation between them is derived. The derived relation represents the complementary property between two operating policies. This implies that it could be possible to obtained desired system characteristics for one of the two operating policies from the corresponding known system characteristics for the other policy. Then, upper and lower bounds of expected busy periods for both dyadic operating policies are also derived.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.71-81
• /
• 2010

In 1994, Korean construction research and development (R&D) projects received investments amounting to 1.2 billion KRW, an amount that rose to 164.8 billion KRW in 2007. Under the current system, construction researchers submit the application records of Construction Research and Development (R&D) in construction projects to the Korea Institute of Construction & Transportation Technology Evaluation and Planning. The performance of Construction R&D projects has thus been dependent on the subjective reporting of the results by the researchers themselves. For this reason, it is difficult to secure confidence in the records of Construction Research and Development. Therefore, this research suggested measures for revitalizing Construction Research and Development, analyzed approaches to cost-saving in Construction Research and Development, and analyzed economic effectiveness in the results of construction R&D.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2008.10a
• /
• pp.8-23
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to develop a Cross Impact System Alternatives Tree(CISAT) model necessary for selecting the interdependent R&D planning system alternatives. This model modifies System Alternatives Tree(SAT) model developed by Kwon et al.. The SAT model is composed of several functions necessary for the achievement of a final goal and several subsystems for satisfying each function. In case that the relationship of technology alternatives is interdependent, this model overlooked a relative importance derived from occurrence or nonoccurrence of the technology alternatives in the future time varience. However, a complex evaluation process within the ballot system is another disadvantage of the SAT. To solve such problems, the Cross Impact Analysis(CIA) model is applied in the SAT model so as to consider the cross impact among interdependent system alternatives.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2010.06c
• /
• pp.99-104
• /
• 2010

정부는 미래의 성장잠재력을 확충하기 위해 국가경쟁력의 핵심인 과학기술에 대한 재정투자규모를 지속적으로 확대하고 있다. 지속적인 R&D투자 확대의 결과로 국가 중요핵심기술 개발이 활발히 이루어지고 있어, 이에 대한 보안관리 또한 중요시 부각되어 금년부터 국가과학기술위원회는 조사 분석 시 보안과제 현황을 조사하는 등의 노력을 기울이고 있다. 그러나, 보안과제의 경우 엄격한 보안대책 요구등의 행정부담 증가의 이유로 인하여 활성화되지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 '09년도 보안과제에 대한 현황분석 및 연구 애로사항을 조사하고, 보안과제에 대한 일선 연구자들의 적극적인 참여를 유도하기 위한 핵심 지원방안을 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 통하여 설계하여 보안과제 활성화를 위한 주요 의사결정의 도구로 활용한다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2020

This study draws implications by surveying and analyzing performance evaluation cases in Korea and overseas, and analyzes qualitative and quantitative performance evaluation indexes and evaluation models that fit the national R & D performance evaluation system through analysis of patent creation performance data or company status data. Also, in order to apply this to a specific group of companies with excellent exports and technical skills, we will conduct a case study on the performance analysis of patent strategy support projects based on the results of the survey. Although this study has some limitations in developing performance evaluation indicators due to the limited scope of business or business characteristics of the patent strategy support project, the qualitative evaluation system can be reviewed through previous studies and domestic and overseas case studies. Due to the problem of accessing and collecting data related to the performance of the support project, there is a limitation that performance analysis cannot be performed at a sufficient level. Nevertheless, after the completion of R&D support projects and patent strategy support projects, follow-up performance analysis can be performed through follow-up surveys. It is expected to be possible.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2008.10a
• /
• pp.440-443
• /
• 2008

In this research, we develop the model of selecting and setting technology modular alternatives. We compose the selecting process(CHP) after setting technology modular alternatives based on technical couple by Conjoint Analysis(CA). Through this process, we can have several advantages. (1) Increasing the accuracy of R&D project evaluation (2) Declining the load of pair-wise comparison

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.386-389
• /
• 2010

In this research, we develop the model of selecting and setting technology modular alternatives. We compose the selecting process(CHP) after setting technology modular alternatives based on technical couple by Conjoint Analysis(CA). Through this process, we can have several advantages. (1) Increasing the accuracy of R&D project evaluation (2) Declining the load of pair-wise comparison.