• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.79-91
• /
• 2012

With the globalisation of the world's economies and the increasing role of multinational corporations in the generation of knowledge, global research and development (R&D) activities in emerging countries are following a new trend. This paper describes case studies of two large companies and discussion of the motives (demand vs. supply) and tasks (demand-driven vs. supply-driven) of R&D activities outside their home country. This work is based on an analysis of four overseas R&D units of two Korean ICT companies - here, ICT refers to goods and services in the information technology and communication technology fields - in India and China. The research findings are as follows: (1) The overseas R&D activities of Korean ICT enterprises in emerging countries may be driven by a combination of demand and supply factors of host countries; and (2) Korean overseas R&D centres in emerging countries may need to carry out both demand- and supply-driven tasks in view of the overlap between demand and supply factors of the host countries. Based on the results of this research, the following policy implications can be drawn for encouraging more effective overseas R&D activities of Korean enterprises in emerging countries. First, the government needs to expand the support systems so that enterprises can manage local R&D centres more effectively and actively use the variety of local support systems and useful information. Second, the government needs to expand the support systems so that the overseas R&D centres of Korean enterprises revitalise collaborations with locally excellent universities and research institutions.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.143-152
• /
• 2009

본 논문은 철강산업의 R&D 역량강화를 위해 IT 부문이 지원할 수 있는 정책을 모색하고 이에 대한 타당성을 검증한 사례연구이다. 기술추격형에서 기술선도형으로의 전환기에 놓여있는 국내 철강산업이 R&D 역량을 강화하기 위해서는 개별 철강사뿐만 아니라 대학, 연구소 등 외부와 개방형 R&D 연계체제를 적극 추진해야 한다. 이러한 상황 하에서 IT가 R&D 역량 강화를 효과적으로 지원하는 역할을 수행해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 목적을 갖는 IT 분야의 지원정책들을 개발하고 우선순위분석 등을 통해 제안된 정책들의 타당성을 검토하며, Triple Helix관점에서 정부, 기업, 학계의 역할을 논의한다.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.95-118
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister?in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to?build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity.?It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400?million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 IoT 분야의 다양한 정부정책을 파악하고, 이들 간 상대적 중요성을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전문가를 대상으로 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)분석방법을 활용하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, IoT 관련 정책범위가 광범위함에도 불구하고, 학계, 산업계 등의 정책 전문가가 매우 제한적이었고, 둘째, 만족도관점에서 해외진출정책, R&D지원 정책, 벤처지원정책, 인력양성정책, 규제정책의 순이었으나 전반적인 만족도 수준은 낮았으며, 셋째, 중요성 관점에서 벤처지원이 가장 높았으며, 그 다음으로 R&D지원, 인력양성, 규제정립, 해외진출의 순으로 높았다. 종합하면 연구활동 지원, 해외시장 개척지원, 벤처제품우선구매, 산학협동 대학교육 강화 등의 선도자적 정부역할에 높은 중요성을 부여하고 있었던 반면에 조정자적 역할에 대한 중요도 인식은 상대적으로 낮았다. 그러나 전문가집단도 정부가 중요한 프로젝트에서는 기본적으로 시범사업이나 실태조사 등을 수행해 와서, 이의 중요성에도 불구하고 제대로 인식하지 못하였을 수 있다.

• 벤처혁신연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.17-39
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 정부의 R&D 지원과 벤처기업의 스톡옵션제도 활용이 벤처기업의 혁신, 즉 혁신역량 및 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내 벤처확인기업을 대상으로 진행된 벤처기업정밀실태조사 자료를 활용해 부분최소제곱 구조방정식모델링(PLS-SEM) 방법으로 실증분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 정부 R&D 지원의 수혜 여부는 벤처기업의 혁신역량 강화에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, R&D 지원은 벤처기업의 혁신성과에도 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 벤처기업의 스톡옵션제도 활용은 기업의 혁신역량 강화에 정(+)의 영향을 미치고, 벤처기업의 혁신성과에도 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 벤처기업의 혁신역량은 정부의 R&D 지원 및 벤처기업의 스톡옵션제도 활용과 기업의 혁신성과 사이를 유의하게 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과들은 벤처기업의 혁신에 있어서 정부의 R&D 지원과 스톡옵션 제도의 활용이 의미있는 역할을 할 수 있음을 보여주며, 아울러 혁신의 프로세스에서 벤처기업의 혁신역량이 중요한 의미가 있음을 보여준다. 따라서 벤처기업에 대한 R&D 지원의 기조를 꾸준히 이어나가면서 동시에 기업의 역량강화를 지원하는 다면적 정책수단을 투입할 필요가 있으며, 스톡옵션제도의 활성화를 위한 법적·제도적 정비와 정책적 지원이 지속적으로 이루어질 필요가 있을 것으로 보인다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.62-68
• /
• 2019

The growth and employment effects of R&D investment were analyzed according to business size, export value and manufacturing sectors so as to suggest improvement directions for effective industry policies. The effect of R&D investment was considered simultaneously from the two perspectives of growth and employment effect, and the causality analysis was carried out by using a path analysis. The result of the path analysis confirmed significant differences in the growth effect of R&D investment depending on business size. However, the effect of increasing employment was difficult to obtain statistically significant results for any various combinations of business size and export value. This is a mixture of directions for the effects of R&D investment on employment, which could be due to the failure to consider appropriate time lags between investment and effect. Efficiency analysis by industry sectors confirmed significant differences in efficiency depending on business size, but differences depending on export value were difficult to identify. In order to derive improvement policy by industry sector according to business size and export value, the direction of selective support policy and universal support policy was derived for six industry groups by combining the return to scale in the efficiency analysis and R&D concentration. Hirschman-Herfindahl index is used for calculating R&D concentration.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.47-63
• /
• 2018

Government R&D grants for SMEs have risen to three trillion Korean won a year, placing Korea second among OECD nations. Indeed, analysis results have revealed that government support has not only expanded corporate R&D investment and the registration of intellectual property rights but has also increased investment in tangible and human assets and marketing. However, value added, sales and operating profit have lacked improvement owing to an ineffective recipient selection system that relies solely on qualitative assessments by technology experts. Nevertheless, if a predictive model is properly applied to the system, the causal effect on value added could increase by more than two fold. Accordingly, it is important to focus on economic performance rather than technical achievements to develop such a model.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2017

In this paper, we compared the efficiencies of national R&D investments between NT (Nanotechnology) areas in terms of papers, patents, and commercializations, and found ways to improve the efficiencies of national R&D investments for each NT area. This is in response to huge R&D investments government has made recently in NT areas. Here, we collected data on investments, papers, patents, and commercializations for the R&D projects in NT areas through National Science & Technology Information Service. Based on the data, we analyzed the investment and performances (papers, patents, and commercializations) for each NT area, calculated the efficiency for each NT area, and compared the efficiencies between NT areas. Next, using cluster analysis, we identified several NT areas with similar characteristics in terms of paper efficiency, patent efficiency and commercialization efficiency. Finally, we derived implications for the efficiency enhancement for each grouping. The cluster analysis showed that there could be two groups, one being low in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and high in terms of commercialization efficiencies, while the other being high in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and low in terms of commercialization efficiencies. Therefore, the strategy for one group calls for support for technology transfer or technology introduction from other R&D performers and grant of guidance for improving R&D performers' commercialization ability to other R&D performers while the strategy for the other group calls for R&D support for transfer of technology to other R&D performers, activation of technology transfer and support for commercialization of R&D performers.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.135-159
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Rrsearch is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments'industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime MinisterJanuary 2001, commits an additional ${\$}$3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims toworld competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around ${\$}$400mi11ion a year. This cost is expected to rise to over hall a billion by 2005-06 (commonwealth or Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.