• Title/Summary/Keyword: R&D Innovation

Search Result 1,676, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

The Relationship between Innovation Capability of R&D and the Firm's Performance : Comparing Regional Strategy Industry with Non-Regional Strategy Industry in Daegu (R&D 혁신역량과 기업성과 간의 관계: 대구지역 전략산업과 비전략산업 간 비교분석)

  • Shin, Jin-Kyo;Jo, Jeong-Il
    • Management & Information Systems Review
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.211-235
    • /
    • 2011
  • We examined the relationship between innovation capability of R&D and the firm's performance by mainly comparing regional strategy industry with non-regional strategy industry. Also, this analysis involved comparing the relationship by regional strategy industry. For the purpose of this study, we divided innovation capability of R&D into input, process and output. The first of main results in this study was that regional strategic industry was significantly higher than non-regional strategy industry in innovation capability of R&D with the exception of the CEO's mind for technological innovations. However, we found no significant difference in the firm's performance. Second, in the results of comparing innovation capability of R&D and the firm's performance by regional strategy industry, electronic-information equipment industry was significantly superior to other industries. Third, it was found that the relationship between innovation capability of R&D and the firm's performance was different by regional strategy industry. Also, R&D manpower and R&D process were more significant factors affecting the firm's performance rather than R&D input and output.

  • PDF

Determinants of Private R&D Investment by Firms' Innovation Strategies - A Case study of Small and Medium Enterprises in Busan - (기업의 혁신전략에 따른 민간 연구개발 투자 영향 연구 - 부산지역 중소기업을 중심으로 -)

  • Park, Mun-su;Park, Sehee;Son, Wonbae;Kim, Bomi
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.27-52
    • /
    • 2019
  • This research studied the determinants of private R&D investment by examining the innovation strategies of 481 small and medium enterprises (SMEs, their employee size is 5 or more and less than 300) in Busan, South Korea. The data is derived from the Technology Survey of Small and Medium Enterprises in 2001 and 2003. Three explanatory variables for the innovation strategies are the R&D portfolio, the organization (personnel) for R&D, and the strategic role of CEO for innovation. The technological levels of industries are controlled in the linear regression model. The dependent variable is the total private R&D investment of a firm in the given fiscal year. The empirical results indicate that the private R&D investment positively correlates with the complexity of the R&D portfolio, the formal organization for R&D team, and the increase of R&D personnel. The formal organization for R&D team and the number of R&D personnel are correlated with the increase of private R&D investment across the four groups in the manufacturing sector but not in the service sector. These findings suggest that the innovation policy needs to target firms who have complex R&D portfolios, the formal organization of R&D teams, and sufficient R&D personnel in order to increase the private R&D investment of SMEs in regions, with consideration of industrial characteristics.

An Empirical Study on Technological Innovation Management Factors of SMEs (중소기업의 기술혁신 관리요소에 관한 실증연구)

  • Im, Chae-Hyon;Shin, Jin-Kyo
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.75-107
    • /
    • 2012
  • Previous researches on technological innovation have several limitations such as lack of general mechanism for technological innovation(inputs, throughputs and outputs of technological innovation), large company oriented studies, and ignoring importance of technology management capabilities. So, this study suggested a new model using resource-based theory and system theory, and empirically applied that to SMEs. Structural equation model analysis by using 223 SMEs in Daegu region provided a support for most of hypotheses. Research results showed that all of factors on technological innovation were significantly and positively related with each other: inputs(R&D leadership, innovation strategy, R&D investment, R&D human resource management, external network), throughputs(portfolio management, project management, technology commercialization) and output(technological innovation). In case of technological innovation inputs, R&D leadership influenced on innovation strategy positively and significantly. And R&D leadership and innovation strategy had positive and significant effects on R&D investment, R&D human resource management and external network. R&D human resource management and external network exerted positive and significant influences on technological innovation throughputs such as portfolio management and project management. But R&D investment did not significant impacts on technological innovation throughputs. Among technological innovation throughputs, both portfolio management and project management had positive and significant effect on technology commercialization. In addition, technology commercialization acted positively and significantly technological innovation output. This study suggests necessary of efforts to implement innovation strategy and manage R&D human resource effectively based on CEO's innovativeness and entrepreneurship. Also, if SMEs want to develop technology and commercialize it, they have to cooperate with external technology resources and informations. Research results revealed that proper level of R&D investment, internal and external communication, information sharing, and learning and cooperative culture were very important for improvement of technological innovation performance in SMEs. Especially, this research suggested that if SMEs manage technological innovation process effectively based on resource-based and system approaches, then they can overcome their resource limitations and gain high technological innovation performance. Also, useful policy support for technological innovation of central or regional government by this research model is important factor for SMEs' technological innovation performance.

  • PDF

R&D Service Industry Innovation Plan to Improve R&D Productivity and Vitalize Technology Innovation Ecosystem (R&D 생산성 제고와 기술 혁신 생태계 활성화를 위한 연구 서비스산업 혁신 방안)

  • Pyoung Yol Jang
    • Journal of Service Research and Studies
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.144-158
    • /
    • 2023
  • R&D (Research and Development) investment by companies and the government continues to increase, and the total R&D expenditure of public and private sectors in 2021 reached KRW 102 trillion, and the ratio of R&D investment to GDP was 4.96%. It ranks second in the world after Israel. This study analyzes the current status of the domestic R&D service industry and the research and development (R&D) innovation ecosystem based on the business activity survey data of the National Statistical Office in terms of improving R&D productivity of domestic R&D investment that has exceeded 100 trillion won, and analyzes the global R&D service industry and analyzes the global research service industry and R&D service Industry support government policy As a result of the analysis, in the domestic R&D ecosystem, the R&D outsourcing demand of service companies is rapidly increasing, compared to the stagnant R&D outsourcing demand of traditional manufacturing companies. In order to respond to these changing demands for technological innovation, this study suggests balanced support for R&D outsourcing for manufacturing and service companies, expansion of domestic R&D outsourcing, establishment of R&D outsourcing strategies specialized for the service industry, establishment of an open R&D ecosystem, and innovation in connection with materials/parts/equipment strategies.

The Growth Pattern Of R&D Activities With Innovation in the Digital Economy

  • Park, Chu-Hwan;Shin, Yong-Tae
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.16-25
    • /
    • 2002
  • 그 동안 R&D와 관련된 많은 연구는 다양한 성장모형을 이용해 경제성장과 연구개발 투자사이의 관계를 보이는데 중점을 두어왔으나, 디지털 경제에서의 지식 혁신에 의한 R&D활동의 성장패턴을 보이는 연구는 이루어지지 않고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 W기업의 생산과정에서 R&D활동에 따른 비중의 변화가 생산성을 증가시키는 성장의 패턴을 다양하게 할 수 있음을 보이고자 한다.

  • PDF

The Growth Pattern of R&D Activities with Innovation in the Digital Economy

  • Park, Chuhwan;Shin, Yongtae
    • Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
    • /
    • 2002.05b
    • /
    • pp.19-33
    • /
    • 2002
  • 그 동안 R&D와 관련된 많은 연구는 다양한 성장모형을 이용해 경제성장과 연구개발 투자사이의 관계를 보이는데 중점을 두어왔으나, 디지털 경제에서의 지식 혁신에 의한 R&D활동의 성장패턴을 보이는 연구는 이루어지지 않고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 IT기업의 생산과정에서 R&D활동에 따른 비중의 변화가 생산성을 증가시키는 성장의 패턴을 다양하게 할 수 있음을 보이고자 한다.

  • PDF

R&D Tax Concession Program in the Australian Government

  • Moon, Yong-Eun;Yoon, Joseph
    • 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2004.11a
    • /
    • pp.145-168
    • /
    • 2004
  • In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

  • PDF

Cost and Benefits of R&D Tax Concession Program in the Australian Government

  • Moon Yong-Eun;Yoon Joseph
    • The Journal of Information Systems
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.135-159
    • /
    • 2004
  • In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Rrsearch is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments'industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime MinisterJanuary 2001, commits an additional ${\$}$3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims toworld competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around ${\$}$400mi11ion a year. This cost is expected to rise to over hall a billion by 2005-06 (commonwealth or Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

  • PDF

The Contribution of Innovation on Productivity and Growth in Korea (기술혁신이 생산성과 경제성장에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Byung-Woo
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.72-90
    • /
    • 2008
  • What has been the contribution of industrial innovation to economic growth? Typically, the issue has been approached with growth-accounting methods augmented to include a "stock of knowledge". An independent estimate of the rate of return to R&D is found in order to impute patents granted to the accumulation of knowledge. Griliches(1973) then uses a regression approach to assess the effect of an R&D variable on the computed TFP growth rate. The regression coefficient on the R&D variable would provide an estimate of the social rate of return to R&D. The related studies tend to show high social rates of return to R&D, typically in a range of 20 to 40 % per year. We need to provide multiple equation dynamic system for productivity and innovation in Korean economy in state space form. A wide range of time series models, including the classical linear regression model, can be written and estimated as special cases of a state space specification. State space models have been applied in the econometrics literature to model unobserved variables like productivity. Estimation produces the following results. Considering the goodness of fit, we can see that the evidence is strongly in favor of the range $0.120{\sim}0.135$ for the elasticity of TFP to R&D stock in the period between 1970's and the early 2000's.

  • PDF

The relationship between R&D investment and management performance of small companies: Verification of the role of technological innovation and marketing capabilities (소규모 기업의 R&D투자와 경영성과 간의 관계: 기술혁신과 마케팅역량의 역할 검증)

  • Shin, Jinkyo;Lee, Sangwon;Choi, Jaehyeok;Yeo, Kyunghwan
    • Korean small business review
    • /
    • v.43 no.1
    • /
    • pp.85-105
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study verified how R&D investment affects the management performance of SMEs, whether technology innovation mediates this relationship, and whether marketing competency moderates the relationship between technology innovation and management performance. A longitudinal analysis was conducted using data from the corporate panel survey performed by Daegu Technopark every year since 2013. Data from 349 companies in the Daegu-Gyeongbuk region were mainly used, and the size of 30 to 50 employees in the manufacturing industry was a major analysis target company. The results are as below. First, The results showed that R&D investment had a positive effect on management as well as technology innovation, but technology innovation did not affect management performance. Also, technological innovation did not mediate the relationship between R&D investment and management performance. This shows that in the case of small SMEs, even if technological innovation occurs through R&D investment, the technological innovation does not lead to management performance. Also, the relationship between technological innovation and management performance was not changed by marketing capabilities. This shows that technological innovation in small SMEs is not easy to lead to business performance.