• Title/Summary/Keyword: R&D 우선순위

Search Result 143, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

A Study on the Improvement of Naval Combat Management System for the Defense of Drone

  • Ki-Chang Kwon;Ki-Pyo Kim;Ki-Tae Kwon
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.28 no.4
    • /
    • pp.93-104
    • /
    • 2023
  • Recently, the technology of drones is developing remarkably. The role of military drones is so great that they can cause serious damage to the enemy's important strategic assets without any damage to our allies in all battlefield environments (land, sea, air). However, the battleship combat management system currently operated by the Korean Navy is vulnerable to defense because there is no customized defense system against drones. As drones continue to develop, they are bound to pose a major threat to navy in the future. This paper proposes a way for the warfare software of naval combat management system sets a combat mode suitable for anti-drone battle, evaluates the threat priority in order to preemptively respond to drone threats and eliminate drone threats through automatic allocation of self-ship-mounted weapons and sensors, and through a test of the improved warfare software in a simulated environment, it was proved that the time to respond to the drone was improved by 62%.

Research Priorities to Support Mandatory Implementation of a Total Pollutant Load Management System (TPLMS) in the Han River Basin (한강수계 의무적 수질오염총량관리제시행지원을 위한 조사·연구의 우선순위 설정)

  • Lee, Chang-Hee;Lee, Bum-Yeon;Lee, Su-Woong
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.8 no.4
    • /
    • pp.25-36
    • /
    • 2009
  • The Total Pollutant Load Management System(TPLMS) in the Han River basin is being changed from a voluntary to a mandatory system. Accordingly, this study suggests directions and priorities for research that can support implementation of TPLMS through an objective approach that deploys gap analysis and analytic hierarchy processes (AHP). Gap analysis indicated that TPLMS in Korea is still focused on compliance with regulations, and that implementation of TPLMS is still in its early stage. Improvements are thus needed in flexibility and effectiveness, including introduction of emissions rights trading, and upgrading to a renewable emissions permit system. The AHP study indicated that R&D will need to proceed in parallel in multiple areas to improve systems and resolve scientific uncertainties. Balanced R&D will be needed in both the institutional and technical groups. Subgroup analysis indicated that developing a reasonable process to establish water quality management targets is of the highest priority in the institutional group. In the technical group, higher priority will need to be given to improving model reliability and developing innovative pollution load reduction technologies.

  • PDF

A Study on Development Strategy of Korean Hidden Champion Firm Utilizing the SWOT/AHP Technique (SWOT/AHP 기법을 이용한 한국형 히든챔피언 기업의 발전전략에 관한 연구)

  • Chung, Youn-Kyaei;Lee, Sang-Suk
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.97-111
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study reviews preceding research for detailed factors to establish development strategies for Korean Hidden Champion firms and classifies strategy factors into internal ones and external ones through specialists' opinions to draw strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each factor. It also sets hierarchical model to draw up a survey, distributes the survey to groups of specialists and enterprises respectively and then examines consistency ratio. Fifty-four copies of survey whose reliability on responses is secured through examining the consistency ratio are evaluated with their relative importance in factors by using SWOT/AHP technique and their order of priority is determined. Based on their results, development strategies for Korean Hidden Champion firms are established. SWOT/AHP analyses results show that external factors are with the opportunity of industry growth and the threat of intensified competition and market uncertainty and internal factors are with the strength in order of technological competence, construction competence in customer relation and marketing competence. The weakness in the lack of funds, lack of brand awareness in order. This result suggests that external environments of enterprises that more emphasis should be put on the industry growth and aggressive strategies cannot help but be adopted even in a global competition getting fiercer every day are seen more important. Then, it also seems to be thought that the technological competence including R&D and specialization, construction competence in customer relation and marketing competence should internally chosen for strategies to support strategies. The order of priority in development strategies for Korean Hidden Champion firms is drawn as; (i) aggressive S/O strategy which utilizes opportunities by taking advantage of strengths, (ii) W/O strategy which utilizes opportunities by supplementing weaknesses, (iii) diversified S/T strategy which utilizes strengths to make up for threats and (iv) defensive W/T strategy which supplements weaknesses to overcome threats.

  • PDF

A Study on Activation Technology Commercialization of Railway Vehicle Parts Manufacturing SME (철도차량부품 제조 중소기업의 기술사업 활성화를 위한 요인 분석)

  • Kim, Myung Jong;Lee, Kyung Chul;Koo, Jeong Seo
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.39 no.5
    • /
    • pp.657-665
    • /
    • 2019
  • The domestic railway parts and equipment manufacturing industry is mainly focused on SMEs, and the majority of them are suffering from profitability because they cannot build economies of scale. Besides, they have survived in the form of importing technology products from overseas advanced countries and delivering them to domestic railway operators rather than having in-house technology. Therefore it is necessary to study whether the problems of the current railway industry can be identified and improved and at the same time, whether the government's railway industry development policy is properly reflected. literature studies related to technology commercialization, and conduct surveys of AHP questionnaires on the experts of the manufacturing industry of SMEs, academics / research institutes of the railway industry. After that, the Level 3 activation method AHP analysis was additionally performed on the important factors of Level 2 that have the highest importance and priority in Level 1. As a result of the AHP analysis, 'Technical Connectivity' was the most important method in the technical factor, and SME experts and academic and research institute experts were highly evaluated for 'commercialization ability' Competence in terms of importance. As for external support factors, it was analyzed that SME experts "support for manpower development" was important, while the other two group experts research and development support was important. In this study, the priority of the government support and policy priorities are suggested according to the capabilities of the railway manufacturing SMEs before the future R&D support.

A Study on the Strategy for Improvement of Operational Test and Evaluation of Weapon System and the Determination of Priority (무기체계 운용시험평가 개선전략 도출 및 우선순위 결정)

  • Lee, Kang Kyong;Kim, Geum Ryul;Yoon, Sang Don;Seol, Hyeon Ju
    • Convergence Security Journal
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.177-189
    • /
    • 2021
  • Defense R&D is a key process for securing weapons systems determined by mid- and long-term needs to cope with changing future battlefield environments. In particular, the test and evaluation provides information necessary to determine whether or not to switch to mass production as the last gateway to research and development of weapons systems and plays an important role in ensuring performance linked to the life cycle of weapons systems. Meanwhile, if you look at the recent changes in the operational environment of the Korean Peninsula and the defense acquisition environment, you can see three main characteristics. First of all, continuous safety accidents occurred during the operation of the weapon system, which increased social interest in the safety of combatants, and the efficient execution of the limited defense budget is required as acquisition costs increase. In addition, strategic approaches are needed to respond to future battlefield environments such as robots, autonomous weapons systems (RAS), and cyber security test and evaluation. Therefore, in this study, we would like to present strategies for improving the testing and evaluation of weapons systems by considering the characteristics of the security environment that has changed recently. To this end, the improvement strategy was derived by analyzing the complementary elements of the current weapon system operational test and evaluation system in a multi-dimensional model and prioritized through the hierarchical analysis method (AHP).

A qualitative study for barrier factors of Korean venture firms' internationalization using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP를 이용한 한국벤처기업의 국제화 장애요인에 관한 질적 연구)

  • Yoo, Sung-Joon;Kim, Hag-Min
    • Korea Trade Review
    • /
    • v.43 no.1
    • /
    • pp.199-221
    • /
    • 2018
  • The internationalization of venture firms is of importance resulting from the increased opportunities as well as the entry barriers faced in this process. This study is to investigate barrier factors affecting Korean venture firms' internationalization. Among these factors, we measured relative weights using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Literatures regarding global firm's internationalization was reviewed, and barriers were classified environment, corporate and CEO barriers. Multiple variables were used in order to measure their relative significance. We surveyed executives of venture firms comprising two groups: first, 15 global venture firms, and secondly, gradually internationalizing firms. The two groups show contradictory results as environment barriers are the primary for born-global ventures and corporate barriers are the primary for gradually internationalizing ventures. Concerning corporate barriers, the lack of marketing capability is the highest barrier for both groups. The CEO barrier is the lowest for both groups. Regarding corporate barriers, gradually internationalizing ventures considers the risk of business as highest, whereas born-global ventures features the lack of R&D capacity as highest Results of this paper imply that firms should consider priority and sequential approaches in facing environment, corporate and CEO barriers.

  • PDF

Priority of logistics technology development per each Field by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) & study on the use actual condition between Consumer and developer in Logistics Technologies (계층화분석법(AHP)에 의한 물류기술 분야별 개발 우선순위분석과 물류기술 수요자.개발자 이용실태에 관한 연구)

  • Min, Yeon-Ju;Roh, Hong-Seung;Ye, Chung-Yel;Jeong, Dong-Hun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2009.10a
    • /
    • pp.180-181
    • /
    • 2009
  • This paper is to find the priority of logistics technology development per each field by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) for policy establishment of logistics technology, finding of logistics technology projects. And study on the use actual condition between Consumer and developer in Logistics Technologies. For this study, Survey for logistics technology concerning user's demand and the developer's logistics technology development. And Gap analysis between user and developer in logistics technology development.

  • PDF

Re-prioritizing of Prospective and Strategic Technologies for Future Agricultural Mechanization using AHP (AHP를 이용한 농업기계분야의 미래 유망 및 전략 기술에 대한 우선순위 재설정)

  • Cho, K.T.;Chang, D.I.;Shin, B.C.;Han, J.I.;Kim, J.Y.;Lee, J.I.
    • Journal of Biosystems Engineering
    • /
    • v.33 no.2
    • /
    • pp.142-148
    • /
    • 2008
  • The study was focused on setting priority for future core technologies in agricultural mechanization using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). A total of 23 technologies was selected by specialists. Evaluation criteria for the priority setting were decided as 'technology', 'marketability', and 'publicity'. Thirteen specialists in agricultural mechanization answered the questionnaire for AHP. As the results, 'technology' was decided as the most important evaluation criterion. 'feasibility' in 'technology' criterion, 'market growth' in 'marketability' criterion, and 'impact to other industry' in 'publicity' criterion were decided as sub-criteria in each criterion. The most important technology was 'Development of portable safety evaluation system for fresh and convenient agricultural products'.

A study on the Determinant Priority of Royalty between Government-funded research centers and Companies who were transferred the technology. ; Focused on the case of 'N' Center. (기술이전 협상에서 기술도입 기업의 기술료 결정 요인 중요도에 관한 연구 ; N 사업단 기술도입 기업 사례를 중심으로)

  • Baek, Jong-il;Hyun, Byung-hwan
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.3
    • /
    • pp.135-145
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to present meaningful information and policy implications concerning the determinants of royalties to the government-funded research centers and agencies. These groups are responsible for policies encouraging technology transfer from the public sector to the private sector. To identify key determinants of royalties in technology transfer, this study conducted AHP survey analysis (Survey period: 01/10~31/10, 2016) of 85 companies which were participants of the R&D project "Next Generation BioGreen21" of R.D.A in the "N"center from 2011 to 2015. Research results show that the critical factors include: 1)Technical considerations for determining the profitability of the technologies, 2)The interest and willingness of the management group, 3)Necessity and urgency of technology transfer. These findings suggest three main policy implications. First, the government-funded research centers and agencies should develop technologies that help companies improve their commercialization as well as the profitability in the near future. Second, government-funded research centers and agencies should consider reducing the administrative burden of the royalty payment for private companies. Third, public R&D projects should reflect the proper research schedule for technology development on the basis of the R&D time span of companies which transfer technology.

Development of Agenda for Pharmaceutical Care Service Research and Development using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (약료서비스 R&D 고도화를 위한 우선순위 기반 전략과제 설정)

  • Han, Nayoung;Jeong, Chae-Reen;Song, Yun-Kyoung;Yoon, Jeong-Hyun;Jang, Sunmee;Lee, Eui-Kyung;Shin, Hyun Taek;Lee, Young Sook;Sohn, Hyun Soon;Ji, Eunhee;Suh, Dong Chul;Kim, Daekyung;Oh, Jung Mi
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.45-55
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background: Although the importance of pharmaceutical care service has been growing to meet the needs of customers with the improvement of clinical and humanistic outcomes, there was not a systematic strategy to promote research in Korea. The aim of this study was to suggest the core agendas for pharmaceutical care services research and development (R&D) considering priorities. Methods: Based on desk researches, we developed R&D agendas for the needs of improving pharmaceutical care services in the area of institution, community, and public health. To determine the priority of agendas in developing pharmaceutical care service, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis was performed by the 14 experts. Criteria and subcriteria were assessed for significance by pairwise comparisons. Then, agendas were evaluated for importance according to each subcriteria, and rank ordered considering the weight calculated by multiplying the importance scores of the criteria and the subcriteria. Results: We derived 25 agendas including 13 for institutional pharmaceutical care service, 8 for community pharmaceutical care service, and 4 for public-health related pharmaceutical care service. AHP model was constructed based on 4 criteria and 8 subcriteria by a hierarchical structure. From the AHP survey, the 'Development of pharmaceutical care service for metabolic and chronic disease' agenda accounted for the highest priority. Conclusion: We have developed the R&D agendas of the pharmaceutical care service which should be promoted. The results should be utilized by the government to nationally support the development of the standards and relevant regulations related to pharmaceutical care services in Korea.