• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2000

Objective : Use of Internet for health related information is rapidly increasing. There is, however, no consensus as to which information is correct and reliable. This study was conducted to develop an evaluation standards for health related information on the Internet for the purpose of delivering correct information to internet users. Methods : A Delphi technique, which involved a panel of 65 experts, was used as the research design for this study. In the first round, the initial evaluation criteria which consisted of 12 items was developed through a literature review by the researcher and the items represented 2 categories, structure and function. In the second round, a semi-structured questionnaire was sent to the experts with the initial evaluation tool and the respondents identified 55 items. In the third round, these 55 items were analyzed for content validity by the experts and a total of 35 items were included in the model; 11 items in the structural area, 24 in the functional area. Conclusions : Development of indicators for the evaluation of internet site for health information is crucial to provide correct and reliable information. For evaluation to be effective further evaluation programs need to be developed so that users can be sure that the information they received is accurate.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.52-57
• /
• 2013

In this paper, the evaluation system in order to achieve the program education objectives of Accreditaion Board for engineering education of Korea, analyze the educational objectives evaluation tool case studies of programs that are run by each university, the program educational objectives to match the actual situation of university I have developed a distinction between questions the evaluation and assessment system. Configuration, execution, measurement, analysis, is a five-step mooring, the evaluation tool, is a graduate research you are currently using the most in Korea, the employer survey, education target assessment model of the program, employment trends of graduates, I decided to graduate focus group interviews. Distinction between questions, the evaluation also developed a questionnaire to derive the important keywords of education for each objectives. Improvement evaluation tool, the evaluation criteria is required, the University is preparing evaluate (NGR) in South Korea engineering education certification next regularly, requires research on semantic analysis of the results of measurement of the educational goals of the program in the future some.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2004

일반적으로 형성 평가는 교수-학습 활동이 진행 중에 투입되는 평가활동으로 학습 정보에 대한 피드백과 교정 및 교수 방법의 개선을 위한 평가이다. 본 논문에서는 형성평가에서 학습자 개인의 평가 결과에 따라 서로 다른 피드백을 제공하는 시스템을 제안한다. 이 시스템은 지식, 이해, 적용 등의 영역별 기준에 따라 제작된 문항을 통해 각 학습자를 평가하고 이 결과를 기반으로 구분된 학습자 유형에 따라 서로 다른 피드백을 개별 학습자에게 제공하며 학습자는 이를 통해 부족한 영역을 보완하게 된다. 교수자에게는 문항별 정답 비율뿐만 아니라 학생 개개인에게 제공되었던 피드백 내용도 알려주어 교수방법을 개선하도록 한다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.33-43
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study was done to develop a web-based diagnostic evaluation program for nurses to prevent malpractice liability. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature and 9 specialist interviews were used to search for learning goals and content for protection for nurses from malpractice. Data on needs for learning goals were collected from 56 hospital nurses who agreed to complete a self-report questionnaire. The diagnostic program was evaluated between September 2008 and August 2009 by 35 new hospital nurses using an application of the web-based program evaluation tools by Chung (2000). Results: A comprehensive review of the literature and interviews were used to search for learning goals and content. The evaluation program was composed of the 73 questions for diagnostic evaluation under 23 learning goals and 6 grand learning goals which included the principles of law, patient's rights, legal responsibility, patient's safety, regulation on nursing practice and patient's rights protection. Evaluation of the program showed that the mean for program evaluation was 3.43 (SD=.37). Conclusion: This diagnostic evaluation program could be an efficient method for teachers and learners to improve nurses' behavior in protecting the patient's rights and preventing malpractice claims.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2023

In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제29권5호
• /
• pp.692-702
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to explore global consumer behavior with fashion products, Korean fashion products, and Korean traditional fashion products (i.e., Han-Bok). Clothing selection criteria for fashion products and Korean fashion products were included as major constructs far the comparison among global consumers based on their nationality. Other consumer behavior variables were shopping place, buying frequency, purchase experience/plan, preferred brand, purchase items, information source, purchasing usage, and the product evaluation of Hanbok. A convenience sample of 236 global consumers was selected for this study. A questionnaire was pilot tested, and the revised questionnaire was used for the interview survey. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Various nationality were existed such as Europe, North America, Japan, China, South East Asia. The results indicated that the most important criteria for fashion buying were design, fit, and size in order. Fit, size, and color item from buying criteria were significantly different among global consumers by nationality. Country of origin was found as less important factor among global consumers. Department store was most favorable shopping place, and once a month is the most mentioned category in buying frequency. Preferred brands were Levi's, Polo, Gucci, and Prada, etc. Secondly, regarding the evaluation of Korean fashion products, textile quality was highly evaluated. Significant difference except design/style category were existed among global consumers by nationality. Thirdly, regarding the evaluation of Hanbok, the product evaluation of Hanbok highly represented as special event clothing, unique image, beautiful details and oriental beauty in order. Significant difference in good quality of textiles, oriental beauty, coordination with good colors and fabrics, beautiful details and unique style and design were existed among global consumers by nationality. Managerial implications were discussed.

• 복식
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 1994

The aim of this study was to inspect the change of the evaluation scores of the clothing according to the numbers of simple exposure. Two cuts of slides representing a 29-years old female figure clothed either in formal suits or in casual were shown to 41 college female students majoring in clothing and textiles. Questionnaire consisted of 9-point bipolar semantic differentials was given out at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 times of slide exposure. Results were : 1. The evaluation score was the highest after 3 times of exposure . At after 5 times of exposures the score decreased abruptly and increased slightly thereafter. 2. Th evaluation score of the formal suit was higher at the first exposure , but the casual acquired higher score after 3 times of exposure and maintained the superiority thereon. 3. The final score of evaluation of clothing was most similar with the score of after-7-times of exposure, but was almost similar with that of after -5-times of exposure.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.249-258
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study was to determine if personality types affect apparel evaluation. Personality types was applied using Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(MBTI). The data were collected from 101 female using questionnaire to evaluate on apparel, and were analysed with factor analysis, Mann-Whitney test. Results revealed several significant differences with apparel evaluation to personality type. Extroversion and introversion had significant difference in fashion concern. Extroversion types were significantly evaluated fashion concern more than introversion types. Sensing and intuition had significant difference in conformity. Sensing types were significantly evaluated conformity more than intuition types. Thinking and feeling had significant difference in symbolism. Thinking types were significantly evaluated symbolism more than feeling types. Judging and perceiving had significant difference in conformity. Judging types were significantly evaluated conformity more than perceiving types.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 1998년도 창립기념 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.184-193
• /
• 1998

The existence of railroad line gives many influences in various kinds of aspects. To minimize negative influences is necessary to line's improvement, but appropriate methodology doesn't show until now. In this study, Fuzzy Integration Method(FIM) are employed in an effort to give ranking for railroad line's improvement in Seoul. The FIM is designed to generalize a various influences, appeared on account of existence of railroad line. Empirical analysis is performed for railroad line in distance of 83.5㎞ in Seoul. The total lines are divided in 51 sections, and there are selected a 11 evaluation index to reflect influences. Through a questionnaire survey about residents, operator and administrator, important degree of evaluation items are decided, reveal ins the interests of related groups. Then, evaluation values are calculated wi th practical survey results about each sections. The results of evaluation reveal that the higher ranking of improvement from FIM concentrates the Kyeng-Ul Line and Kyeng-Won line because these lines appear a many public discontents and negative influences such as noise and demolition of living environment.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제20권11호
• /
• pp.163-168
• /
• 2015

Various methods have been used to solve the problem of the evaluation of the complex decision-making. In the case of public projects, used the AHP method to evaluate the pre-feasibility of the projects. In this paper, The pre-feasibility was referring to the 'General guidelines for the pre-feasibility' of the KDI and was used the AHP to evaluate for public projects of the H-city. In order to achieve this object, the structured hierarchical model and questionnaire developed based on the evaluation guidelines of the KDI. Also, the weight of evaluation factor was calculated based on the AHP method and was obtained the evaluation results for the project implementation alternative.