• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2020

지방공사·공단은 「공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률」과 「지방공기업법」에서 규정하는 공공기관이자 지방공기업이다. 지방공사·공단의 사업은 지방자치단체의 업무 일부를 위탁 받아 공공시설 및 공공시설물 관리 등을 담당하고 있기 때문에 무엇보다 책임 있는 행정 운영이 중요하다. 이러한 지방공사·공단의 특성과 함께 조직운영에 있어서 윤리경영과 지식경영의 중요성이 대두되고 있기 때문에 조직 활동의 정당성과 공정성을 확보하기 위한 수단으로서 체계적이고 전문적인 기록관리가 수행되어야 한다. 본 연구는 전국의 지방공사·공단을 대상으로 하여 기록관리 업무현황과 더불어 기록관리 업무발전 가능성에 대한 인식도를 파악하여 개선방안을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 문헌연구와 함께 전국 지방공사·공단 중 50개 기관의 기록관리 담당자로부터 받은 설문조사 응답을 분석하였으며, 응답자 중 18명을 대상으로 인터뷰를 실시하였다. 분석결과를 바탕으로 국가기록원의 기록관리 업무지원 역할강화, 지방공사·공단 차원의 기록관리 업무개선, 유사기관 간 협력체 구성 및 활성화를 개선방안으로 제안하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2013

This study investigates the current status of the green growth policies of Korean public corporations and proposes some potential improvement ideas. A set of twenty global green trends are first elicited by using classified macro trends of environmental changes. The green trends are categorized into four key issues based on which domestic and international research efforts are compared. The management performance reports of Korean public corporations are then throughly analyzed to evaluate the validity of their strategic green tasks in relevant to the global green trends. Finally, we suggest some potential government policies for enhancing the existing green growth businesses of public corporations.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권7호
• /
• pp.527-535
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 부채감축을 목표로 시행된 공공기관 정상화 대책이 공기업의 보수적 회계처리에 어떠한 영향을 주었는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 구체적으로 공기업의 부채비율에 따른 보수적 회계처리가 일반적으로 어떠한 행태를 가지는지 검증하고, 공공기관 정상화 대책의 시행으로 보수적 회계처리 행태가 변화하였는지를 검증한다. 분석결과를 요약하면, 공기업의 경우에도 일반 사기업과 동일하게 부채비율과 보수적 회계처리 간에 유의한 양(+)의 관련성이 존재함을 확인하였다. 이는 공기업의 부채비율이 높아질수록 더욱 보수적인 회계처리가 이루어짐을 의미한다. 그러나 양자 간의 관련성은 정상화 대책이 시행된 이후에 유의한 변화가 관찰되지 않았다. 이는 공공기관 정상화 대책의 시행은 공기업의 보수적 회계처리 행태를 변화시키는 요인이 아님을 의미한다. 본 연구의 결과는 최근 보고되는 공기업의 지속적 부채감축 성과가 보수적 회계처리 실무와는 무관하며 실질적인 경영정상화 과정에 의한 것임을 시사한다. 본 연구는 공공기관의 부채감축이 중요시되는 현 상황에서 정부 정책의 효과를 평가하는데 중요한 실증적 증거를 제시하였다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2005

The object of this study is to elicit major success factors along with the phases of implementing the BPR in case of public corporations. To obtain the goal of this research, (1) this study reviews and integrates the major previous BPR studies and shows critical success factors of implementing BPR projects coincided with the characteristics of the public organizations. (2) This study has analyzed and arranged the details of BPR projects of public corporations in South Korea through the literature survey, the questionnaire and the interview. (3) This study classifies 40 critical success factors which were identified in existing studies into ones belonging to 3 phases of BPR projects implementation: Introduction Phase, Execution Phase and Stabilization Phase. (4) This study has tested the relation between critical success factors on each stage of BPR projects implementation and the performance variables. It has proven that there is the statistically significant correlation between the success factors and the performance. The findings of this study are thought not only to be useful as a practical guideline in carrying out BPR project Implementation but also to provide significant basis for constructing the theoretical framework of effective BPR project implementation strategy.

• Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.108-122
• /
• 2017

This study explores how South Korean citizens evaluate corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices based on communal and exchange relationships. Specifically, it examines whether their evaluations of the two types of relationships are related to their supportive opinions, such as positive attitudes toward corporations and behavioral intentions to purchase products. The findings show that the communal relationship between an energy corporation and its local residents is more related to their supportive opinions than exchange relationship. That is, a communal relationship tends to generate more positive business outcomes than an exchange relationship. This study concludes that corporations should prepare for useful community outreach and CSR programs for their local community. Practitioners need to focus on building communal relationships with community members through their programs.

• Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2015

A recent public opinion survey found that the anti-corporate sentiment of South Korean citizens is primarily due to the misbehavior of Korean corporations. South Korean citizens' skepticism of corporations may hinder the democratic and economic development of the country. As a driving force for community development, social capital is considered to enable citizens to collaborate with one another to resolve a shared problem. Specifically, this study pays attention to the relationship among social capital, corporate capacity, and trust, which may perhaps contribute to developing a democratic environment in Korean society. The study aims to explore whether Korean citizens' perceived corporate bonding and bridging social capital affect corporate capacity for collaborative action and trust in corporations. A Web survey of 385 South Koreans was conducted. The findings show that perceived bonding social capital among employees is positively related to corporate capacity for collaboration action. Moreover, perceived bonding among employees and bridging social capital between employees and local residents are positively related to corporate capacity for collaboration action and trust in corporations. These findings suggest that researchers and practitioners for organizational development and community-building need to enhance corporate social capital.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제67권4호
• /
• pp.181-202
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 사회복지법인의 법적 성격을 살펴보고 이와 밀접히 관련된 외부이사제의 필요성을 법률적으로 검토함으로써 향후 사회복지사업법의 개정 방향에 관하여 제안하는 것이다. 사회복지법인의 법적 성격을 일률적으로 공공부문 또는 민간부문이라고 파악해온 학설 및 판례를 소개하고 이들을 비판적으로 검토하면서 본 연구는 다양한 요인을 기준으로 시설법인의 성격과 지원법인의 성격을 구분하는 성격 이원론을 제시한다. 성격 이원론에 따르면, 시설법인의 경우 상대적으로 공공성이 강하여 공공부문에 가깝고 이에 따라 사적자치가 제한될 수 있으므로 외부이사제의 필요성이 크고 법률적으로도 합헌이라고 볼 수 있다. 반면, 지원법인의 경우 상대적으로 공공성이 약하여 민간부문에 가깝고 이에 따라 사적자치가 보장되어야 하므로 외부이사제의 필요성이 크지 않고 법률적으로도 위헌의 소지가 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구는 시설법인에 대하여만 외부이사제를 적용하고, 지원법인에 대하여는 투명성을 담보할 수 있는 규제만을 남겨두고 외부이사제를 폐지하는 것이 바람직하다는 입법론을 제안한다. 이렇게 할 때 사회복지법인들의 고유한 사업목적과 운영철학이 존중되고 사회복지서비스의 다양성이 실현될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.400-406
• /
• 2020

In this study, we first measured the malmquist productivity index by DEA among the Korean public firms. Second, there are 12 public corporations whose productivity (MPI) has decreased compared to 2014. This is mainly because of a decrease in productivity, as well as a decrease in the technical efficiency change index (TECI), impacted by the internal environment, and the increase in productivity because of an increase in the technology change index (TCI) impacted by the external environment. Finally, the analysis of the impact on the management assessment scores showed that the productivity (MPI), scale efficiency (CRS), size of sales, operating profitability, and total capital investment efficiency are significantly related (+), except for the asset turnover, which is a static financial ratio. Meanwhile, the management evaluation scores between the high-productivity public corporations and low-performing public corporations were significantly discriminating. Thus, it is confirmed that the nation's state-run companies must manage their MPIs in a time series to score high in management evaluation.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.91-116
• /
• 2015

This study aims to provide public sectors with eco-efficiency information. To implement the purposes of the study, environmental and economic variables of Eco-Efficiency were identified through decision tree model, then the relative Eco-Efficiencies of 243 public sectors were evaluated through input-oriented DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model. Specifically, the amount of public purchasing per a staff and the amount of energy use per a staff were considered as input factors. Sales per a staff was considered as output factor. The result shows that most of the public sectors (94.2%) were evaluated as "inefficient" taking into consideration of average value, 0.501 from market-based public corporations, 0.288 from local public corporations, 0.28 from quasi-market-based public corporations, 0.269 from fund-management-based quasi-governmental institutions, 0.09 from non-classified public institutions, and 0.078 from commissioned-service-based quasi-governmental institutions. Furthermore, it is possible to establish a plan for internal Eco-Efficiency improvement based on information of the reference set. In order to improve the Eco-Efficiency in the public sectors in the long term, environmental impacts of the overall public sectors' operations (e.g., energy saving, water saving, waste reduction, and purchasing of green products) needs to be properly proposed in consideration of BSC (Balanced Scorecard) indicators of public sectors.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.49-63
• /
• 2014

With the huge concerns on the inefficiency of public enterprises, particularly a significant amount of debt, an increasing number of studies have been carried out to analyze the levels of inefficiency and investigate the causes of that inefficiency. However, very limited range of analytical methodologies have been used in the efficiency analysis and moreover, the effects of external factors have been little addressed. This study explores the efficiency of urban railway corporations in Korea by utilizing a method of stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). In particular, the potential effects of external factors including residential and floating populations of a station were statistically analyzed. A total of seven Korean urban railway corporations were selected to compare each other in terms of operational efficiency. The results present three important findings. First, the Cobb-Douglas model was found to be more valid for SFA compared to the Translog model. Second, the efficiencies of urban railway corporations in Seoul and Busan are relatively high whereas those of Daejeon and Gwangju are very low in efficiency in the area of sales revenue. In an aspect of number of transport of passengers, Gwangju Metro also showed the lowest efficiency. Third, the external factors are significantly associated with the efficiency, indicating that the efficiencies of Daejeon Metro and Gwangju Metro would increase while the efficiency of Seoul Metro would decreases when the external variables are excluded in the efficiency analysis. The results provide several meaningful implications for managers of the urban railway corporations as well as policy makers who are attempting to resolve the inefficiency problems of public enterprises.