• 방사성폐기물학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 2009

사용후핵 연료 관리 정책 결정 에 있어 사회적 수용성은 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 본고에서는 그 역동적 과정을 담아낼 그릇으로서 공론장을 제안한다. 즉, 사용후핵 연료 관리 정책에 대한 공론장은 무엇이고, 공론장의 주체인 이해관계자들은 누구이며 또 공론장에 내재된 갈등구조는 어떠한지에 대해 살펴보고, 바람직한 공론장의 조건에 대해 논의한다. 공론장은 다양한 이해관계자와 시민이 스스로의 의지를 바탕으로 정책의 결정과정에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 기제와 제도를 의미한다. 현실성 있고 효과적인 공론장을 구축하고 운영하기 위해서는 사용후핵 연료 관리를 둘러싼, 정치, 외교안보, 경제, 사회문화, 법과 제도에 관한 면밀한 분석과 대응방안 마련이 필요하다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.78-91
• /
• 2017

In this study, we conducted a comparative study on user's perception and behavior on public system service (PSS) using institutionalism theory and MGA (multi-group analysis) methodology. In particular, this study focuses on how institutional isomorphism is applied to public system services and how MGA can be implemented correctly in a variance based SEM (structural equation model) such as PLS (partial least square). A data set of 496 effective responses was collected from pubic system users and an empirical research was conducted using three segmented models categorized by public proximity theory (public firms = 113, government contractors = 210, private contractors = 173). For rigorous group comparisons, each model was estimated by the same indicators and approaches. PLS-SEM was used in testing research hypotheses, followed by parametric and non-parametric PLS-MGA procedures in testing categorical moderation effects. This study applied novel procedures for testing composite measurement invariance prior to multi-group comparisons. The following main results and implications are drawn : 1) Partial measurement invariance was established. Multi-group analysis can be done by decomposed models although data can not be pooled for one integrated model. 2) Multi-group analysis using various approaches showed that proximity to public sphere moderated some hypothesized paths from quality dimensions to user satisfaction, which means that categorical moderating effects were partially supported. 3) Careful attention should be given to the selection of statistical test methods and the interpretation of the results of multi-group analysis, taking into account the different outcomes of the PLS-MGA test methods and the low statistical power of the moderating effect. It is necessary to use various methods such as comparing the difference in the path coefficient significance and the significance of the path coefficient difference between the groups. 4) Substantial differences in the perceptions and behaviors of PSS users existed according to proximity to public sphere, including the significance of path coefficients, mediation and categorical moderation effects. 5) The paper also provides detailed analysis and implication from a new institutional perspective. This study using a novel and appropriate methodology for performing group comparisons would be useful for researchers interested in comparative studies employing institutionalism theory and PLS-SEM multi-group analysis technique.