• Journal of Computing Science and Engineering
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.221-248
• /
• 2008

Data provenance is the background knowledge that enables a piece of data to be interpreted and used correctly within context. The importance of tracking provenance is widely recognized, as witnessed by significant research in various areas including e-science, homeland security, and data warehousing and business intelligence. In order to further advance the research on data provenance, however, one must first understand the research that has been conducted to date and identify specific topics that merit further investigation. In this work, we develop a framework based on semiotics theory to assist in analyzing and comparing existing provenance research at the conceptual level. We provide a detailed review of data provenance research and compare and contrast the research based on d semiotics framework. We conclude with an identification of challenges that will drive future research in this field.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.234-248
• /
• 2016

Due to the proliferation of data being exchanged and the increase of dependency on this data for critical decision-making, it has become imperative to ensure the trustworthiness of the data at the receiving end in order to obtain reliable results. Data provenance, the derivation history of data, is a useful tool for evaluating the trustworthiness of data. Various frameworks have been proposed to evaluate the trustworthiness of data based on data provenance. In this paper, we briefly review a history of these frameworks for evaluating the trustworthiness of data and present an overview of some prominent state-of-the-art evaluation frameworks. Moreover, we provide a comparative analysis of two key frameworks by evaluating various aspects in an executional environment. Our analysis points to various open research issues and provides an understanding of the functionalities of the frameworks that are used to evaluate the trustworthiness of data.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.175-185
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 효과적인 정보공유를 위한 방안으로서 생성의미종속성을 소개하고, 데이터의 생성의미에 대한 이해가 정보공유에 미치는 영향을 측정하는 정보공유비용모형을 제시한다. 정보공유비용모형은 복수의 사용자집단 또는 부서들 사이에서 데이터의 생성의미 차이로 인한 정보공유 오류비용을 측정한다. 정보공유 오류비용은 정보공유오류의 발생확률과 비용에 의하여 결정되는데, 오류 발생확률은 사용자집단들 사이의 생성의미 차이를 나타내는 정보공유 거리로 측정된다. 본 연구는 대표적인 정보공유아키텍처인 부서별 데이터관리구조, 허브형 구조, 계층형 구조, 독립형 구조를 대상으로 정보공유비용을 측정함으로써 정보공유구조가 정보공유에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 정보공유비용의 관점에서 허브형이 가장 우수한 것으로 분석되었다. 그러나 데이터의 생성의미에 대한 표준화가 이루어지지 않을 경우, 허브형 정보공유구조는 부서별 데이터관리구조와 같은 특성을 보였다. 그리고 모든 정보공유구조가 독립형 구조보다 낮은 정보공유비용을 보임으로써 비록 표준화가 이루어지지 않아도 데이터를 공유하는 것이 공유하지 않는 경우보다 우수한 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제8권
• /
• pp.209-232
• /
• 1981

The study aims at bringing to the attentions of Korean librarians the ways and means with government publications, which had hardly been brought to the scene yet. It deals with the characteristics of archives and the nature of an archival arrangement based on 'the principle of provenance' ; the characteristics of government publications in relation to the adequacy of an archival arrangement; the three major devices in use for organizing government publications; and introduction to two sample classification systems. The study concludes with a notion that a vast reservoir of information sources(government publications) should be tapped and put to the use of researchers without delays inherent in library processing. It advocates an archival arrangement for economy and efficiency.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.7-22
• /
• 2000

It is almost impossible to fulfill the users' information needs efficiently without any finding aids. The idiosyncrasy of archival materials had led the archivists to develop their own descriptive rules until the mid of 1980s. It was the arrival of computers and information networks that stimulated the archival community to standardize its variant descriptive practices. The primary purpose of the national and international archival description standards is to facilitate the cooperative archival data exchange. The Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards of the International Council on Archives adopted ISAD(G) and ISAAR(CPF) in 1993 and in 1995 respectively. ISAD(G) guides the formulation of information in each of 26 elements that may be combined to constitute the description of an archival entity. ISAAR(CPF) is to give general rules for the establishment of archival authority records in descriptions of archival documents. Histories, structures and fundamental principles of those two international archival standards have been studies in this article. Most of the present archival description standards are based on the principle of provenance and the authority model. The instability of modern organizations and the digitalization of record keeping systems have been making the archivists to review these basic archival principles. It is suggested that Korean archival community should attempt to draft a national archival descriptive standard suitable to the Korean archival practice and Korean language in the framework of the international standards.