• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This Study aims to promote technology transfer commercialization and ultimately make contribution towards enhancement of the success rate of commercialization of technology transfer at national level by deducing the factors that impart influence on the negotiation at the time of technology trading between the seller and buyer of technology of public research institutions subjected to transfer and sales. Research design, data and methodology - This Study deduced 5 research hypotheses through preceding researches related to technology transfer commercialization related technology marketing for technology trading negotiation. This Study was conducted by verifying the hypotheses through multiple regression analysis. Results - As the result of the Study, the research hypothesis H1, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the innate characteristic factors of the technology', and H5, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the mutual factors of the parties of the technology trading', among the 5 research hypotheses were chosen. Conclusions - It was found that the technology seller must be able to demonstrate technological value of the technology being sold in order to successfully conclude technology transfer trading negotiation and mutual understanding and harmonious communication between the parties.

• 지역연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.119-141
• /
• 1997

This study aims to identify the role of science park for technology commercialization and business promotion. After theoretical review about science park and technology commercialization, the instruments for stimulating entrepreneurship and business in science park are described. The experience of Taedok Science Town is examined in terms of main sectors of activities, universities as base for technology transfer and the potential for technology commercialization. In conclusion, the complex model is suggested as the development strategy for business incubation in accordance with the stages of development and active technology commercialization.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.41-58
• /
• 2023

This study identifies the commercialization success factors that can be an important indicator for the transfer and commercialization of national R&D results in the agricultural sector. Unlike other industries, the agricultural sector has a non-systematically scaled and processed industrial structure, and R&D is led by government rather than the private sector. Although the quantitative performance of national agricultural R&D, especially the number of patents and publications, has increased rapidly with the quantitative expansion of the government R&D budget, the technology commercialization of the results of agricultural R&D has been accompanied by difficulties for SMEs. Therefore, this study summarized the success factors for commercialization of state-owned technologies presented in previous studies, and based on them, analysed the success factors for commercialization specific to the agricultural sector. It also conducted a questionnaire survey using Delphi and focus group interviews (FGI) with experts from academia, research and industry, and a survey of agricultural companies to derive success factors for commercialization in the agricultural sector using logistic regression analysis. As a result, five indicators with positive correlation and three indicators with negative correlation within technology characteristics, suppliers, adopters, policy and market factors were finally derived as key factors for agricultural commercialization. In the future, it is expected that independent factor analysis of the food and seed sectors, which have independent industry characteristics from the agricultural sector, will be needed.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.165-175
• /
• 2012

최근 21세기 세계 경제가 지속적인 성장을 유지하기 위한 핵심요소로서 기술의 축적, 이전, 흡수, 상용화 등이 중요하게 인식되고 있으며, 정부는 공공연구기관에서 개발된 기술이 민간부문으로 이전되어 사업화되는 것을 촉진하고 민간부문에서 개발된 기술이 원활히 거래되고 사업화되는 것을 촉진하기 위해'기술의 이전 및 사업화 촉진에 관한 법률'을 마련했다. 또한 동 법률 제14조에서는 기술거래사의 등록 육성 및 지원에 관한 사항으로 '기술거래사' 자격제도를 도입하여 국가에서 등록, 운영, 관리하고 있으며 대부분의 선진국은 기술거래중개 기관을 민간에 이양하여 기술중개기관 또는 기술브러커로 지칭하고 있다. 국내에서는 이러한 자격제도 도입과 시장 활성화 촉진을 위한 다양한 조직과 기술중개시스템을 구축하였음에도 불구하고 기술거래사 등록제도와 사후관리에 대한 법률적 근거와 체계가 미흡하여 문제점이 발생되고 있다. 일례로 최근 기술거래관련 실적면제로 기술거래사 등록 활성화는 달성하였으나, 실적 검증을 통한 일정수준 이상의 전문가 선별에는 한계점이 나타나고 있다. 이에 경력증명서 기재 내용만으로 업무 경력 보유 여부를 판단하기에는 심사의 한계점이 드러나고 있어 이에 대한 대책이 시급하다. 또한 기술거래사 등록 시 의무적 교육이수제도가 2010년도에 법 개정 및 고시 개정으로 마련되었으나, 소양교육수준의 단기 교육과정 운영으로 신청자에게 다양한 전문지식 취득의 기회 제공이 어려움이 있는 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 한국과 중국의 기술거래사 제도 비교를 통해 기술거래사 제도개선에 대해 고찰해 보았다. 이를 통해 기술이전 사업화 시장 확대와 기술거래사 전문가의 업무영역 보장과 전문가로서의 입지확보 등 경쟁력을 강화하는데 활용될 수 있도록 개선안을 제시하였다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.51-64
• /
• 2019

Purpose - Research on the ability of domestic public institutions to conduct business is being conducted. Research on government support policy for public technology projects, emphasizes technology creation. Public agencies are encouraging evolutionary barriers at the stage of realistic business. This paper presents the policy possibilities by presenting policies and strategies based on corporate public policy. Research design, data, and methodology - In this study, we surveyed the actual state of public technology commercialization based on the data on state of technology commercialization of public institutions. We collected and analyzed the literature data to enhance the competitiveness of technology commercialization by identifying success cases of public technology commercialization. In Korea, there are not many research papers that provide policy alternatives for technical commercialization of public research institutes. Therefore, in this paper, we review various government policies and check the status of technology commercialization to increase its value. Results - As a result of this study, it is suggested that various policy development is necessary for the commercialization of public technology, because it is important to increase the value of technology users, suppliers, investors and customers through various network activation. In particular, it is necessary to establish differentiated Korean public technology commercialization model for the proliferation of public technology commercialization by presenting methodical model of technical commercialization. Conclusions - Through this study, it is important to raise the competitiveness of domestic public technology commercialization, to create economic value, and to improve the performance of technology commercialization. Therefore, it is necessary to contribute to the creation of research achievement, research method of excellent technology, and method of commercializing technology, and to create achievement of technical commercialization in the future. In addition, from the viewpoint of commercialization of technology, strategies for creating value through utilization of public technology should be prepared, and a plan for mutual prosperity among domestic companies should be prepared. Policy alternatives of various public technology commercialization to build national competitiveness have been developed, and various examples of performance for the performance of public technology commercialization should be derived.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.53-69
• /
• 2019

Purpose - National scientific technology R&D investment is exceeding 60 trillion won per year, and the results of patent applications and technology transfers are visually improving. However, despite the improving research results of national R&D, the practical results of technology startups are mediocre. It is now time to expand the construction of the technology commercialization ecosystem, where the expansion of national R&D leads to the results of technology startups. Therefore, this study discussed the measures to increase the competitiveness of technology startups through the factual survey of the companies that benefitted from R&D support programs. Research design, data, and methodology - This study targeted 996 companies that benefitted from the R&D projects of the Technology Transfer Center for National R&D Programs, and deducted itemized issues through the survey replies. Survey questions were prepared to estimate the national R&D results, and the technology recognition path, the purpose of detailed introduction of the technology, investment of the commercialization fund, economic results, and the factors of success and failure were analyzed. Results - As for the recognition rate of technology during the process of corporate technology commercialization through the technology transfer, recognition through project participation showed a high response rate, and diverse implications of technology commercialization were deducted through the analysis of economic results. As for the resolution alternatives, the proliferation of technology commercialization platform that can create excellent technology for the companies in early stages and the measure of expanding the distribution of technology infrastructure were suggested. In this study, public technology commercialization strategy is established, and the innovative marketing strategy is presented. Conclusions - This study reveal that the result of creating scientific technology jobs should be deducted, in order to produce the revolutionary results of job creation by suggesting the success models of technology commercialization based on domestic scientific technology. In particular, even though the support systems for public research results are being diversely suggested, accurate studies on their actual conditions are currently lacking. Therefore, this study suggest realistic political alternatives to assure results in the process of public technology commercialization, by examining the current state of public research results of R&D support institutions and diagnosing the issues.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제40권5호
• /
• pp.462-476
• /
• 2014

The Korean government has been implementing diverse policies with programs to generate better outcomes and results of university-industry collaboration since 1990s. In this paper, we analyze the effect of universities' competency factors on the performance of technology commercialization and start-ups respectively. We employ multiple regression models using 154 data sets from university information posting system of the Korean Council for University Education. Through conducting statistical analyses with diverse data manipulations, we obtained a high degree of significance on hypotheses, and also could compare mutual differences between the effects of university competence on technology commercialization and start-ups. The technology transfer and commercialization specifically depends on professors' patent applications and technology holding company, while start-ups does professionals in industry-university cooperation. We suggest government to spur on the ongoing customization of university-industry collaboration policy, and university to properly cope with global atmosphere changing from ivory tower to academic capitalism and start-ups promotion.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.50-84
• /
• 2019

미국 대학들의 기술사업화가 베이돌 법 시행 이후 크게 활성화된 것과 같이, 국내 대학들의 기술사업화 실적도 2000년 기술이전촉진법의 제정이후 다수의 관련 법규 정비와 정부의 지원 사업 및 기술사업화 경험 축적 등으로 인하여 견실하게 증가하고 있는 추세이다. 그러나 국내 대학들의 기술사업화 수준은 미국 등 선진국 대비 아직도 부족한 편으로 본 연구에서는 이를 극복하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 체계적 문헌 고찰 방법론을 활용하여 동 분야에서 2000년부터 수행된 국내 논문들을 분석하여 국내 대학의 기술이전 또는 창업의 촉진 요인들에 대하여 확인하였다. 분석 결과 기술이전 영향요인에 관한 선행 연구가 가장 많았으며 창업 영향요인에 대한 논문은 최근 활발히 증가함을 알 수 있었고, 연구방식은 실증연구가 가장 높은 비중을 차지함을 확인하였다. 기술사업화 영향요인의 경우 대학 내부와 외부요인이 확인되었고, 전자는 인적자원, 기술 지식자원, 재정자원, 관리자원 전략, 대학 유형, 및 교육 문화로, 후자는 수요자, 지역, 및 인프라로 구분한 후 체계적 범주화를 통해 분야별 세부 요인들을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 국내 대학의 기술사업화에 대한 그간의 연구 결과들을 체계적으로 조망하여 부족하거나 추가적인 연구가 필요한 분야를 확인하였다는 의의가 있으며, 본 연구에서 집성된 국내 대학들의 기술사업화 촉진요인들은 이를 대학 또는 공공기관 등에서 체크리스트로 활용함이 가능할 것이다.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.61-68
• /
• 2013

현대사회가 지식기반사회로 변화하면서 특허와 상표 그리고 영업비밀 등의 지식재산권과 저작권에 대한 관심과 중요성이 증가하고 있어 특허 정책과 전문 인력에 대한 새로운 변화가 요구되고 있다. 민간부문에서 개발된 기술이 원활히 거래되고 사업화되는 것을 촉진하기 위해 기술의 이전 및 사업화 촉진에 관한 법률을 마련하고, 동 법률 제14조에서는 기술거래사의 등록 육성 및 지원에 관한 사항으로 기술이전 및 사업화에 관한 전문지식이 있는 사람은 지식경제부장관에게 기술거래사로 등록할 수 있도록 하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 현재의 기술거래사 등록제도를 면밀히 검토해 보고 거래라는 관점에서 유사한 동질성을 가지고 있는 공인중개사 자격제도와 비교 검토하여 개선안을 도출해 보고자 하였다. 그 결과 기술거래사를 취득한 자만이 해야 만하는 업무 영역을 명시하여 전문가로서의 입지를 다질 수 있는 기반을 마련 해야하고, 등록증 관리 전담기관 위탁 운영을 통해 사후 관리 업무에 대한 매뉴얼 기준 마련해야 한다는 개선점을 도출하였다. 또한 공고 안을 작성할 때 공고의 필요성과 기술거래 사업을 위한 개설 등록기준을 마련할 필요성이 있다. 이러한 개선안을 통해 기술거래 시장 활성화에 동기를 부여하고 기술 마케팅과 기술이전 사업화의 저변 확대에 큰 영향을 미칠 것으로 기대한다.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2020

Purpose- The purpose of this study is to increase the effect of public technology transfer through government R&D support to secure the competitiveness of public technology startups. The government's R&D budget in 2019 is over 20 trillion won, and there is a legitimate need to increase the performance of technology startups through such R&D results. Research design, data, and methodology- In this paper, we comprehensively analyzed the current status of public research institutes and R&D support projects suitable for founders and analyzed and presented cases of follow-up research conducted by the Institute of Science and Technology Jobs to analyze actual performance cases of R&D support institutes. Results- In this conclusion, a developmental model of public technology entrepreneurship was proposed to increase the performance of public technology commercialization with the scalability of research institutions. In order to create a public technology information system between consumers and suppliers, a Steinweiss-type technology commercialization model for public technology commercialization, and a job-creating enterprise-type linkage R&D support business model were presented to create the results of R&D support organizations. Conclusions- Through the results of this study, it is meaningful to analyze the performance cases of technology commercialization of R&D support institutions, which have not been studied so far, to build competitiveness of research institutions and to present a growth model for the spread of technology startups. This study has implications in terms of suggesting a way to build competitiveness in technology commercialization between market demanders and suppliers by linking existing public technology startups, which deviated from the simple commercialization support system, with job creation by expanding the R&D support system.