• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.387-393
• /
• 2014

Background Reconstruction of ischial pressure sore defects is challenging due to extensive bursas and high recurrence rates. In this study, we simultaneously applied a muscle flap that covered the exposed ischium and large bursa with sufficient muscular volume and a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap for the management of ischial pressure sores. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 14 patients (16 ischial sores) whose ischial defects had been reconstructed using both a profunda femoris artery perforator flap and a muscle flap between January 2006 and February 2014. We compared patient characteristics, operative procedure, and clinical course. Results All flaps survived the entire follow-up period. Seven patients (50%) had a history of surgery at the site of the ischial pressure sore. The mean age of the patients included was 52.8 years (range, 18-85 years). The mean follow-up period was 27.9 months (range, 3-57 months). In two patients, a biceps femoris muscle flap was used, while a gracilis muscle flap was used in the remaining patients. In four cases (25%), wound dehiscence occurred, but healed without further complication after resuturing. Additionally, congestion occurred in one case (6%), but resolved with conservative treatment. Among 16 cases, there was only one (6%) recurrence at 34 months. Conclusions The combination of a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and muscle flap for the treatment of ischial pressure sores provided pliability, adequate bulkiness and few long-term complications. Therefore, this may be used as an alternative treatment method for ischial pressure sores.

• Archives of Reconstructive Microsurgery
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.146-156
• /
• 1998

저자들은 1997년 1월부터 1998년 7월까지 두경부 악성종양 및 반안면왜소증과 같은 선천성 안면기형을 주소로 본원에 내원하였던 환자 9명을 대상으로 하여 9례의 외측대퇴 유리피판술을 시행하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 첫째, 두경부 재건에 있어서 외측대퇴 유리피판은 다른 유리피판술에 비해 여러 장점을 가지고 있었다. 특히, 공여부 추형이 노출되지 않는 부위이며 동시에 두팀이 수술에 참여할 수 있어서 수술시간이 단축될 수 있었다. 둘째, 술후 방사선치료를 시행하면 피판의 모발은 사라지지만 모공의 과각화증 및 색조 침착이 증가하므로, 외측대퇴부에 모발이 많은 환자는 술후 방사선치료의 여부와 관계없이 미용적인 금기사항에 해당한다. 셋째, 악성종양 절제후에 발생하는 결손의 재건시 피판의 두께가 문제시 되지 않았으며, 피판의 두께는 피판을 도안할 때의 위치, 성(sex), 피하지방층의 제거정도, 근육의 포함 정도, 술 후 피판의 위축정도에 따라 조절 가능하였다. 넷째, 모든 증례에서 정맥이식없이 혈관문합이 가능하였으므로 두경부 재건시 혈관경의 길이는 충분한 것으로 사료된다. 다섯째, 가능한 피판을 장축으로 길게 도안하여 두 번째 또는 네 번째 관통동맥을 포함시켜 수술 후 발생할지도 모르는 혈류부전에 대비하는 것도 피판의 생존률을 높이는 좋은 방법으로 사료된다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제36권5호
• /
• pp.559-564
• /
• 2009

Purpose: Surgical reconstruction of an ischial soft tissue defect presents a challenging problem owing to a high rate of recurrence, especially paraplegic patients. Although various muscle, musculocutaneous and fasciocuta - neous flaps have been used in the reconstruction of ischial soft tissue defect, it is still debated which type of flaps are the best. We had performed a relatively durable adductor magnus perforator island flap based on the perforators originated from the first medial branch of the profunda femoris artery for coverage of ischial soft tissue defect where was not a region universally reconstructed by perforator flap. Methods: From August 2005 until January 2008, the adductor magnus perforator island flap had been used for resurfacing of the ischial soft tissue defects in a series of 6 patients (4 male and 2 female). Ages ranged from 26 to 67 years (mean, 47.5 years), and follow - up period from 13 to 26 months (mean, 16.7 months). Causes were 4 pressure ulcers, 1 cellulitis and 1 suppurative keratinous cyst. Results: The sizes of these flaps ranged from 12 to 18 cm in length and 7 to 9 cm in width. The flaps survived in all patients. Marginal loss over the distal area of the flap by infection was noted in one patient, which was treated successfully with a subsequent split - thickness skin graft. Average thickness of the flap was 0.94 cm, which was more thicker than other perforator flaps. Long term follow - up showed a good flap durability. Conclusion: In planning a reconstructive option of ischial soft tissue defect, the adductor magnus perforator island flap is a relatively large cutaneous flap with a durable thickness. With proper patient selection, careful vascular dissection and postoperative management, we recommend this flap is a good and suitable option for coverage of the ischial soft tissue defect.