• Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2007

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used technique to assess or to improve reliability of products at early stage of design and development. Traditionally, the prioritization of failures for corrective actions is performed by developing a risk priority number (RPN). In practice, due to insufficient evaluation criteria specific to related product and processes, RPN is not properly evaluated. This paper reestablishes an effective methodology for prioritization of failure modes in FMEA procedure. Revised evaluation criteria of RPN are devised and a refined FMEA sheet is Introduced. To verify the proposed methodology, it is applied to RPN evaluation for motors in household appliances.

• Proceedings of the ESK Conference
• /
• 1995.04a
• /
• pp.16-22
• /
• 1995

The importance of usability evaluation is increasing in developing a new system and product. The current approaches for usability evaluation are: the comparative evaluation to measure usability, and the iterative user interface design to find usability problems. This paper pressents three types of characteristics and a set of criteria for usability evaluation. The methodology for criteria-based quantitative analysis of user interface usability is investigated with a view to measuring usability. The fuzzy weighted-checklist method with linguistic variables is used for quantitatie analysis. This analysis provides a quantitative measure, which reflects the degree of excellence of user interface usability during the design and development phases.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.47-53
• /
• 2009

We define product line (or mix) selection problem as selecting a subset of potential product variants that can simultaneously minimize product proliferation and maintain market coverage. Selecting the most efficient product mix is a complex problem, which requires analyses of multiple criteria. This paper proposes a method based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for product line selection. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a linear programming based technique commonly used for measuring the relative performance of a group of decision making units with multiple inputs and outputs. Although DEA has been proved to be an effective evaluation tool in many fields, it has not been applied to solve the product line selection problem. In this study, we construct a five-step method that systematically adopts DEA to solve a product line selection problem. We then apply the proposed method to an existing line of staplers to provide quantitative evidence for managers to generate desirable decisions to maximize the company profits while also fulfilling market demands.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
• /
• v.29 no.5 s.142
• /
• pp.692-702
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to explore global consumer behavior with fashion products, Korean fashion products, and Korean traditional fashion products (i.e., Han-Bok). Clothing selection criteria for fashion products and Korean fashion products were included as major constructs far the comparison among global consumers based on their nationality. Other consumer behavior variables were shopping place, buying frequency, purchase experience/plan, preferred brand, purchase items, information source, purchasing usage, and the product evaluation of Hanbok. A convenience sample of 236 global consumers was selected for this study. A questionnaire was pilot tested, and the revised questionnaire was used for the interview survey. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Various nationality were existed such as Europe, North America, Japan, China, South East Asia. The results indicated that the most important criteria for fashion buying were design, fit, and size in order. Fit, size, and color item from buying criteria were significantly different among global consumers by nationality. Country of origin was found as less important factor among global consumers. Department store was most favorable shopping place, and once a month is the most mentioned category in buying frequency. Preferred brands were Levi's, Polo, Gucci, and Prada, etc. Secondly, regarding the evaluation of Korean fashion products, textile quality was highly evaluated. Significant difference except design/style category were existed among global consumers by nationality. Thirdly, regarding the evaluation of Hanbok, the product evaluation of Hanbok highly represented as special event clothing, unique image, beautiful details and oriental beauty in order. Significant difference in good quality of textiles, oriental beauty, coordination with good colors and fabrics, beautiful details and unique style and design were existed among global consumers by nationality. Managerial implications were discussed.

• Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science
• /
• v.13
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2004

This study attempts to investigate the difference between the internet shoppingmall types. The main purpose of this study is to verify the relationships among shoppingmall evaluation criteria, shopping satisfaction, revisit frequency, and repurchase intention across the shoppingmall type. The following results were shown by testing eleven hypotheses using LISREL. First, shoppingmall evaluation criteria such as entertainment, product authentification, economical prices and on-time delivery were significantly related to shopping satisfaction in general merchandise shoppingmall. Second, in specialty shoppingmall, evaluation criteria like informativeness, economical prices and on-time delivery significantly affected shopping satisfaction. Third, as contrasted with the expectation, site design and product assortment did not have significant impact on satisfaction in both internet shoppingmall types. Fourth, shopping satisfaction was significantly related to revist frequency and repeat purchase intention. Finally, some theoretical and managerial implications were discussed.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.33 no.5
• /
• pp.847-859
• /
• 2023

With the recent increase in damage caused by malcious codes using software vulnerabilities in Korea, it is essential to install anti-virus to prevent malicious codes, However, it is not easy for general users to know which anti-virus product has good performance or whether it is suitable for their environment. There are many institutions that provide information on anti-virus performance outside of korea, and these institutions have established their own test environments and test evaluation items, but they do not disclose detailed test environment information, detailed test evaluation items, and results. In addition, existing quality evaluation studies are not suitable for the evaluating the latest anti-virus products because there are many evaluation criteria that do not meet anti-virus product evaluation. Therefore, this paper establishes detailed anti-virus evaluation metrics suitable for the latest anti-virus evaluation and applies them to 9 domestic and foreign anti-virus products to verify the functions and performance of anti-viruses.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.19-24
• /
• 2008

Common Criteria is a standard to estimate safety of information protection product such as network-level firewall system and intrusion detection system. Recently, CC version is changed from CC v.2.3 to CC v.3.1. CC v.3.1 estimation methodology requires a secured dictionary accomodation preparation for information protection product. In this research, progressed CC v3 base composition product test and research about vulnerability analysis method. Further, this paper presents specific plan sorting composition style information protection product examination methodology to existing principle and detailed methodology.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 1999.10c
• /
• pp.363-365
• /
• 1999

오늘날 전세계를 하나로 잇는 정보화사회는 보다 신뢰성 있는 네트워크 보안제품을 요구하며 이들 제품을 객관적으로 평가하기 위한 평가기준을 필요로 한다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 국내 네트워크 보안제품 관련 평가기준(안) 제정을 위해 국제공통평가기준인 CC(Common Criteria)와 미국의 네트워크 보안제품 관련 평가기준인 TNI(Trusted Network Interpretation of TCSEC)를 비교/분석하여 필요한 보안기능 요구사항을 도출하여 향후 평가기준(안) 제정을 위한 방향성을 제시한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
• /
• v.39 no.5
• /
• pp.683-694
• /
• 2015

This study defines the concept of triple media and examines various marketing media that influence a consumer's purchase of outdoor fashion brands. We explore the effects of gender and age on information searches related to outdoor fashion brands and purchase criteria related to outdoor clothing. A survey of consumers who visited stores was conducted. We targeted consumers between the ages of 15 and 50 and analyzed 764 questionnaires. The results show that triple media involve eight factors: five factors (printed ads or radio ads, campaign ads, Internet ads, TV ads, and store ads) in paid media, one factor (direct marketing) in owned media, and two factors (channels of social network services, channels of direct promotion) in earned media. Further, the evaluation/appraisal criteria of outdoor clothing consist of four attributes (practicality, promotional activities, product power, and customer service). The teenager group showed significantly low usage of campaign ads, direct marketing, and direct promotion, while the use of Internet ads is particularly high among teenagers compared to other age groups. Moreover, teenagers are least likely to rely on practicality when evaluating clothing and are most likely to value product power. Additionally, women show significantly high usage of direct marketing. In terms of the clothing appraisal criteria, women assign higher value to practicality and promotional factors than men. The theoretical and managerial implications of the findings are discussed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1994.04a
• /
• pp.344-354
• /
• 1994

In the development of executive information systems (EIS) the selection of an appropriate software package as a system building tool is regarded as a key technology. This paper attempts to shed some light on the evolving field of EIS software packages and provides a helpful Guideline for selecting the most suitable product by addressing significant considerations. A framework is presented that includes a six-step evaluation process: need analysis, team building, vendor survey, identification of decision criteria, and building an evaluation model and its verification. The major evaluation criteria of the full-featured software include: special functionality, reporting, graphics. decision support capability user friendliness, general functionality physical requirements, communication linkage, vendor support, cost related factors, performance, and documentation capability. An illustrative model using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is also discussed to prove the appropriateness of our approach.