• Journal of Industrial Convergence
• /
• v.22 no.10
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2024

This study applied a meta-evaluation approach to examine the performance evaluation system for privately-contracted projects by the National Health Promotion Fund, focusing on the discrepancies in perceptions between evaluators and evaluatees. Using a systems approach, five evaluation elements were analyzed: environment, input, process, outcomes, and utilization. T-tests revealed significant differences in perceptions between evaluators and evaluatees across all five evaluation factors. These differences were particularly pronounced (p<.001) for the following factors: environment(specifically, its appropriateness), input, and utilization(specifically, the performance improvement). To bridge this gap in mutual understanding, it is necessary to provide sufficient explanations of evaluation criteria and procedures, along with reliable feedback on the results. This study informs improvements to the evaluation system, enhancing project performance.