• Title/Summary/Keyword: Preoperative embolization

Search Result 42, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Safety of Aprotinin Under Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (초저체온 및 순환정지하에서 Aprotinin의 안전성)

  • 장병철;김정택
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.30 no.5
    • /
    • pp.501-505
    • /
    • 1997
  • It was reported that use of aprotinin in elderly patients undergoing hypothermic circulatory arrest was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, and myocardial infarction as a result of intravascular coagulation. We reviewed 20 patients who received high-dose aprotinin under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with(NP group, n= 11) or without selective cerebral perfusion(SP group, n=9). The activated clotting time was exceeded 750 seconds in all but 1 patient. After opening aortic arch, retrograde low flow perfusion was maintained through femoral artery to prevent air embolization to the visceral arteries. Four patients among 20 died during hospitalization'due to bleeding, coronary artery dissection pulmonary hemorrhage and multiple cerebral infarction. Postoperatively, cerebrovascular accidents occurred in two patients; one with preoperative carotid artery dissection and the other with unknown multiple cerebral infarction. In conclusion, use of aprotinin in young patients undergoing hypothermic circulatory arrest did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or intravascular coagulation if ACT during circulatory arrest is maintained to exceed 750 seconds with low-flow perfusion.

  • PDF

Comparison of the Neurologic Outcome according to the Method of Proximal Graft Anastomosis at the Aortic Side during Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Heartstring Sealing System versus Conventional Manual Anastomosis (무심폐기 관상동맥 우회술에 있어서 이식편의 대동맥부 근위부 문합 방법에 따른 수술 후 신경학적 합병증 발생의 비교: 하트스트링을 이용한 방법 대 고식적인 수기 문합술)

  • Cho, Won-Chul;Kim, Joon-Bum;Kim, Hee-Jung;Kim, Hwan-Wook;Kim, Yun-Seok;Jung, Jae-Seung;Choo, Suk-Jung
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.42 no.4
    • /
    • pp.441-446
    • /
    • 2009
  • Background: Side clamping of ascending aorta during proximal graft anastomosis in coronary bypassing surgery in-creases the risk of direct aortic injury as well as embolization of intimal atheroma. Heartstring proximal sealing system (Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif), developed to avoid aortic side clamping, may minimize risks of such complications. The aim of the current study is to compare the surgical outcomes of the two proximal anastomosis techniquesi.e., Heartstring system versus aortic side clamping in off pump coronary bypassing' surgery (OPCAB). Material and Method: From January 2003 to August 2008, 499 patients underwent OPCAB. Of them, proximal graft anastomosis was performed using Heartstring system in 182 patients (Group I) and conventional manual anastomosis in 317 patients (Group II). The two groups were compared for postoperative major complications and mortality. Result: Two groups showed similar characteristics in terms of preoperative demographic data, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function and history of diabetes, hypertension and smoking. Although there was no inter-group difference in the history of cerebral ischemia (p=0.48), preoperative brain magnetic resonance angiography revealed greater incidence of severe carotid artery stenosis (>75% of lumen) in the Group I than in the. Group II (44.5% in the Group I and 30.0% in the Group II, p=0.003). There were no inter-group differences in postoperative mortality (p=0.40) and complications (p=0.47) including neurologic events (3 in the Group land 2 in the Group II, p=0.258). Whereas neurologic events all comprised transient ischemic attacks in the Group I, they comprised multiple embolic strokes in the Group II. One patient in the Group II experienced aortic dissection during proximal anastomosis which resulted in ascending aortic replacement. Conclusion: Although proximal anastomosis using Heartstring system did not show statistically significant benefit over aortic side clamping, the. absence of embolic stroke maybe a definite benefit which may be better defined through further studies over a larger cohort.