• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.253-265
• /
• 2011

근관치료된 치아의 수복에서 fiber post 크기와 포스트 공간의 직경이 일치하지 않은 경우, 포스트 공간은 두꺼운 레진 시멘트로 채워지게 된다. 레진 시멘트가 두꺼워지면 시멘트 내에 기포가 형성되어 포스트 분리가 발생되기 쉽다. 이런 문제점을 해결하기 위한 방법은 composite resin을 이용하여 fiber post를 relining하는 것이다. 이렇게 형성된 해부학적 포스트는 포스트 공간에 잘 적합하고 시멘트의 두께를 감소시킨다. 이 연구의 목적은 relining 과정과 임상 과정의 간소화를 위해 사용되고 있는 luting agents 종류에 따른 fiber post의 push-out 결합 강도를 평가하는 것이다. 42개의 발치된 치아는 6개의 그룹(n=7)으로 나누어졌다. (A1: relined fiber post를 Luxacore/all-bond 2로 합착, A2: non-relined fiber post를 Luxacore/all-bond 2로 합착. B1: relined fiber post를 Calibra/XP-bond로 합착. B2: non-relined fiber post를 Calibra/XP-bond로 합착. C1: relined fiber post를 RelyX Unicem으로 합착. C2: non-relined fiber post를 RelyX Unicem으로 합착.) Push-out 결합 강도는 relining procedure와 cement type의 상호작용에 의해 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. relined fiber post 그룹이 non-relined fiber post 그룹보다 더 높은 결합 강도를 가지며 fiber post relining 과정은 결합강도에 유의한 영향을 가진다.(p<0.05) Luting agent에 따라 모든 그룹에서 RelyX Unicem의 결합강도가 Luxacore/All-bond 2와 Calibra/XP bond에 의한 것보다 유의하게 더 높았다(p<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.324-328
• /
• 2014

Although fiber-reinforced posts have been widely used, they sometimes fail to obtain sufficient retention because of an extremely large canal space. To address this, several techniques have been introduced including relining of the fiber-reinforced posts. Here, we used a relined glass-fiber post to increase retention and fitness to the root canal in a crown reattachment case. The relining procedure was performed by using an indirect method on the working cast. This case also highlights the esthetic concerns regarding dehydration of the attached crown fragment.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Poor wettability of denture relining materials may lead to retention problems and patient discomfort. PURPOSE. Purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate wettability of nine denture relining materials using contact angle measurements under air and water storage over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Nine denture relining materials were investigated in this study. Two heat-curing polymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA) denture base materials: Vertex RS, Lang, one self-curing polyethyl-methacrylate(PEMA) chairside reline resin: Rebase II, six silicone relining materials: Mucopren soft, Mucosoft, $Mollosil^{{R}}$ plus, Sofreliner Touch, GC $Reline^{TM}$ Ultrasoft, Silagum automix comfort were used in this experiment. Contact angles were measured using high-resolution drop shape analysis system(DSA 10-MK2, KRUESS, Germany) under three conditions(in air after setting, 1 hour water storage, and 24 hours water storage). Nine materials were classified into three groups according to material composition(Group 1: PMMA, Group 2: PEMA, Group 3: Silicone). Mean values of contact angles were compared using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA, followed by a Scheffe's post hoc analysis($\alpha$=0.01). RESULTS. Contact angles of materials tested after air and water storage increased in the following order: Group 1(PMMA), Group 2(PEMA), Group 3(Silicone). Heat-cured acrylic denture base resins had more wettability than silicone relining materials. Lang had the highest wettability after 24 hours of water storage. Silicone relining materials had lower wettability due to their hydrophobicity. Wettability of all denture relining materials, except Rebase II and $Mollosil^{{R}}$ plus, increased after 24 hours of water storage. CONCLUSIONS. Conventional heat-cured resin showed the highest wettability, therefore, it can be suggested that heat-cured acrylic resin is material of choice for denture relining materials.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.361-366
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of relining materials on the flexural strength of relined thermoplastic denture base resins (TDBRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. For shear bond strength testing, 120 specimens were fabricated using four TDBRs (EstheShot-Bright, Acrytone, Valplast, Weldenz) that were bonded with three autopolymerizing denture relining resins (ADRRs: Vertex Self-Curing, Tokuyama Rebase, Ufi Gel Hard) with a bond area of 6.0 mm in diameter and were assigned to each group (n=10). For flexural strength testing, 120 specimens measuring $64.0{\times}10.0{\times}3.3mm$ (ISO-1567:1999) were fabricated using four TDBRs and three ADRRs and were assigned to each group (n=10). The thickness of the specimens measured 2.0 mm of TDBR and 1.3 mm of ADRR. Forty specimens using four TDBRs and 30 specimens using ADRRs served as the control. All specimens were tested on a universal testing machine. For statistical analysis, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's test as post hoc and Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis (P=.05) were performed. RESULTS. Acry-Tone showed the highest shear bond strength, while Weldenz demonstrated the lowest bond strength between TDBR and ADRRs compared to other groups. EstheShot-Bright exhibited the highest flexural strength, while Weldenz showed the lowest flexural strength. Relined EstheShot-Bright demonstrated the highest flexural strength and relined Weldenz exhibited the lowest flexural strength (P<.05). Flexural strength of TDBRs (P=.001) and shear bond strength (P=.013) exhibited a positive correlation with the flexural strength of relined TDBRs. CONCLUSION. The flexural strength of relined TDBRs was affected by the flexural strength of the original denture base resins and bond strength between denture base resins and relining materials.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.262-272
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. This study aimed to analyze the shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material, according to the surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cylindrical specimens were prepared using DENTCA Denture Base II. The experimental groups were divided into 6 (n = 10): no surface treatment (C), Tokuyama Rebase II Normal adhesive (A), sandblasting (P), sandblasting and adhesive (PA), sandblasting and silane (PS), and the Rocatec system (PPS). After bonding the chairside relining material to the center of the specimens in a cylindrical shape, they were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure mode was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. Shear bond strength values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's honest significant difference test was used for post-hoc analysis (P < .05). RESULTS. Group PPS exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than all other groups. Groups P and PA displayed significantly higher bond strengths than the control group. There were no significant differences between groups PS and A compared to the control group. Regarding the failure mode, adhesive failure occurred primarily in groups C and A, and mixed failure mainly in groups P, PA, PS, and PPS. CONCLUSION. The shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material exhibited significant differences according to the surface treatment methods. It is believed that excellent adhesive strength will be obtained when the Rocatec system is applied to 3D-printed dentures in clinical practice.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제56권3호
• /
• pp.199-205
• /
• 2018

목적: 이 연구는 저온 플라즈마가 자가중합형 재이장용 레진과 주입형 열가소성 의치상 레진의 결합 강도에 미치는 영향을 다른 표면 처리 방법에서 평가하기 위함이다. 재료 및 방법: 네 가지 열가소성 의치상이 이 연구에서 사용되었다: Acrylic Resin (Acrytone), Polyester (Estheshot-Bright), Polyamide (Valplast), Polypropylene (Weldenz)에 다양한 표면처리를 시행하였다: 대조군, 저온플라즈마, Sandblasting, Sandblasting와 저온플라즈마. 표면 처리 후 모든 시편은 Tokuyama Rebase II를 이용하여 원형의 테플론 관에 접착되었다. 전단강도는 Universal testing machine을 통해 crosshead speed 1 mm/min으로 측정되었다. 통계 분석 방법으로는 이원분산분석을, 사후 검정 방법으로는 Tukey's test가 사용되었다. 결과: Acrytone이 다른 열가소성 의치상 레진 그룹에 비하여 통계적으로 유의한 수준에서 더 높은 전단강도를 보인 반면 Weldenz는 가장 낮은 값을 나타냈다. Sandblast와 저온플라즈마를 순차적으로 시행한 조건에서 모든 레진 그룹 중 통계적으로 유의한 수준에서 가장 높은 전단강도 값을 나타냈다. 결론: 열경화성 의치상 레진과 재이장용 레진 사이의 전단강도에 저온플라즈마는 제한된 효과를 나타내었으며, sandblasting 처리와 함께 처리되었을 때 두 재료간 전단강도는 향상되었다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.8-15
• /
• 2011

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 금속 의치상 재료에 직접법으로 이장을 시행했을 때 표면처리와 시간에 따른 결합강도의 변화를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Co-Cr 시편을 최대직경 9 mm의 육각기둥 형태로 절삭하여 제작하였으며, $110\;{\mu}m$의 $Al_2O_3$로 1분간 sandblasting 하였다. 시편을 18개씩 3군으로 나누어 A군은 화학적 처리 없이, B, C군은 금속표면처리제 (MR $bond^{(R)}$, Alloy $primer^{(R)}$)를 도포한 후 7 mm직경의 자가 중합형 이장용 레진 (Vertex $SC^{(R)}$) 기둥을 부착하였다. 각각의 그룹을 다시3군으로 나누어 수분 하에서 다른 기간 (0주, 1주, 2주)동안 저장한 다음 만능역학 실험기계 (Instron)를 이용하여 시편을 분리하였고, 분리되는 시점의 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 통계처리는 two-way ANOVA와 Tukey 방법을 이용하여 5% 유의수준에서 분석하였다. 결과: 시편을 sandblasting한 실험에서는, 1분 동안 sandblasting 한 시편의 표면 거칠기가 가장 크게 나타났다. 전단결합강도 실험에서 결합강도는 B, C, A군의 순서로 낮아졌으며, 이 세 군 사이에 유의성 있는 차이를 보였다. 기간별로 봤을 때 결합강도는 수분에 저장하지 않은 군에서 가장 높았으며 2주 동안 수분에 저장한 군에서 가장 낮았으나 기간별로 유의성 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다. 기간과 군을 함께 고려했을 때 모든 군에서 침수 시간이 길어짐에 따라 결합강도가 낮아졌으나B군과C군에서 임상적인 유의성은 보이지 않았고, A군에서만 유의성 있게 결합강도가 낮아졌다. 결론:Co-Cr 금속 의치상에 진료실에서 직접법으로 이장을 할 경우 적절한 기계적 처리 (Sandblasting) 후 금속 표면 처리제를 도포하는 것이 유리할 것으로 사료된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.305-314
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of a 3D-printed denture base resin (Cosmos Denture), after different immediate repair techniques with surface treatments and thermocycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Rectangular 3D-printed denture base resin (Cosmos Denture) specimens (N = 130) were thermocycled (5,000 cycles, 5℃ and 55℃) before and after the different repair techniques (n = 10 per group) using an autopolymerized acrylic resin (Jet, J) or a hard relining resin (Soft Confort, SC), and different surface treatments: Jet resin monomer for 180 s (MMA), blasting with aluminum oxide (JAT) or erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (L). The control group were intact specimens. A three-point flexural strength test was performed, and data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc test (α = 0.05). Each failure was observed and classified through stereomicroscope images and the surface treatments were viewed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS. Control group showed the highest mean of flexural strength, statistically different from the other groups (P < .001), followed by MMA+J group. The groups with L treatment were statistically similar to the MMA groups (P > .05). The JAT+J group was better than the SC and JAT+SC groups (P < .05), but similar to the other groups (P > .05). Adhesive failures were most observed in JAT groups, especially when repaired with SC. The SEM images showed surface changes for all treatments, except JAT alone. CONCLUSION. Denture bases fabricated with 3D-printed resin should be preferably repaired with MMA+J. SC and JAT+SC showed the worst results. Blasting impaired the adhesion of the SC resin.