• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 1995.11a
• /
• pp.28-49
• /
• 1995

• Proceedings of the Korea Port Economic Association Conference
• /
• 2006.08a
• /
• pp.39-55
• /
• 2006

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.407-416
• /
• 2023

In order to effectively relieve the traffic pressure of the city, ensure the smooth flow of freight and promote the development of the logistics industry, the selection of appropriate port logistics location is the basis of giving full play to the port logistics function. In order to better realize the selection of port logistics, this paper adopts the entropy weight method to set up a multi-dimensional evaluation index, and constructs the evaluation model of port logistics location. Then through the actual case, from the environmental dimension and economic competition dimension to make choices and analysis. The results show that port d has the largest logistics competitiveness and the highest relative proximity among the three indicators of hinterland city economic activity, hinterland economic structure, and port operation capacity of different port logistics locations, which has absolute advantages. It is hoped that the research results can provide a reference for the multi-dimensional selection of port logistics site selections.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.219-226
• /
• 2002

To systematic maintenance and record 10,000 port structures, under Ministry of Maritime and Fisheries, data base management system is required. In this study, POMIS(Port Maintenance and Information System) program is developed for this Purpose. In this program, records for inspection and repair for the various type of port structures can be maintained and operated through internet. Thus ministry can efficiently maintenance and repair port structures and systematically manage computerized maintenance and repair data.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.10a
• /
• pp.283-283
• /
• 2000

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.248-248
• /
• 2017

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2004.08a
• /
• pp.96-101
• /
• 2004

Core competence of enterprises became the focus of many researches recently. This essay summarizes the situation of Chinese harbor enterprises and establishes an evaluating model which makes use of factor-analysis.

• Proceedings of KOSOMES biannual meeting
• /
• 2017.04a
• /
• pp.16-16
• /
• 2017

• Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.262-272
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study is to analysis factors that determine the competitiveness of container ports using the KJ and AHP methods. For this, 54 detailed attributing factors were identified both by previous studies and port users. 24 attributing factors were identified by a group of port experts. also, These were grouped 18 detailed attributing factors into 6 attributing factors by a group of port experts using the KJ method. These were made into a model of hierarchical structure with 3 levels, taking 1 goal factor, 6 evaluation factors and 18 detailed evaluation factors. The collected date of questionnaires were analyzed by a group of port experts using the AHP method. The analysis result of the evaluation factors in container port shows that port cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by port location, port cost, port service, port facility and port management. The analysis results of detailed evaluation factors in container port shows that import and export cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by transshipment cargo volume, distance from main trunk, cargo handling cost, distance from the point of importing and exporting, speediness of cargo handling, stability of cargo handling, vessel/cargo cost in port entry and leaving, punctuality in port entry and leaving, number and length of berth, collateral service cost, terminal area, hinterland accessibility, ability of terminal operation company, front depth of berth, etc.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2022.06a
• /
• pp.24-25
• /
• 2022

Based on the case of Busan Port November anchorage, which is a group anchorage, related regulations to promote group anchorage safety management, the turning radius of anchored ship, and more accurate weather information collection and safety through improvement of the supporting system for VTS operations to apply the anchorage location in accordance with reality that it is a suggestion for management improvement methods.