• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제58권
• /
• pp.127-148
• /
• 2013

The Rotterdam Rules provide that port terminal operator may avoid or limit their liability for cargo loss, damage or delay in delivery or breach of any other obligation under the Rules by invoking the provisions that may provide a defence for, or limit the liability of, the carrier. Consequently the port terminal operator who are involved in the provision of maritime services may avoid or limit their liability for cargo loss, damage or delay in delivery or breach of any other obligation under the Rules. The port terminal operator to be applied for the Himalaya clause under the Rules must show that it has the requisite link with a Contracting State. In addition, the port terminal operator performs service to the period of time between the arrival of the goods at the port of loading and their departure from the port of discharge. The port terminal operator's liability for breaches of its obligation is limited to 875 SDR per package or other shipping units, or 3 SDR per kilogram of the gross weight of the goods. In addition, compensation for delay shall be limited to an amount equivalent to two and one-half times the fright payable on the goods delayed.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.75-86
• /
• 2021

This paper intends to evaluate the policies which are considered necessary to enhance the T/S competitiveness of Busan's port, and thereby present suggestions to the government which would best implement the results of this research. This research first raises the claim that the majority of the following four conditions: location of the port, port productivity/service level, status of network with overseas ports, and cost competitiveness, should be satisfied in order to maintain a competitive T/S port. Based on these four conditions, seven policies, which are individually pertinent to the four conditions, have been drawn up for proposal, and they are also analyzed in the survey, where all the eligible samples participate to ensure if they are effective in enhancing the T/S competitiveness of Busan. Proposed important policies are a) Terminal operator integration, b) port infrastructure expansion, c) global carriers owned terminal operation, d) enhancement of national carrier's competitiveness, e) feeder carriers' owned terminal operation in new port, f) institutional support for effective and convenient environments for handling T/S cargo, and g) volume incentive expansion. From the analysis by which all the relevant parties (Carriers, Terminal Operators, Port Authority) are answered, it was found that all the seven policies have relevance in strengthening the transshipment competitiveness of Busan's port. Whereas in the analysis that uses AHP methodology to compare the significance among the different policies, it was found that terminal operator integration has the highest priority in terms of increasing transshipment competitiveness.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제31권9호
• /
• pp.801-806
• /
• 2007

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) enables decision makers to represent the interaction of multiple factors in complex and unstructured situations. The process requires the decision maker to develop a hierarchical structure of the factors in the given problem and to provide judgments about the relative importance of each of these factors and ultimately to specify a preference for each decision alternative with respect to each factor. The research presented in this paper applies the AHP to identify key players in promoting port competitiveness. The literature survey revealed four major criteria and 15 sub-criteria. The four factors are cost, service quality, facility/capacity and economic-social variable. 150 questionnaires suitable for AHP analysis were made and 77 were returned. It is found that in terms of cost, the first key player is terminal operator and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of service quality, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of facility/capacity, the first key player is port authority and the second key player is terminal operator; in terms of economic-social variable, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.79-93
• /
• 2004

Recently, the change of shipping and port environment has required the new strategy from the liners, terminal operators, ports. The ports of call in the North American and European line also has changed as the Chinese ports made rapid advance. This seems to result from the fact that the trend of the container transportation by sea has developed the traditional concept, called port-to-port system that directly links between a port and another port into the network with complicated hierarchical structure reflecting costs, efficiency, and strategy of the Mega Carrier. This paper suggests the factors for Busan port to become the hub port of northeast Asia by analyzing the change of the liners' strategy along the change of the shipping and port environment, the global management of the operator of container port, and the amount of containers flowing in the northeast Asia.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2007년도 정책세미나 및 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.343-369
• /
• 2007

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.159-178
• /
• 2012

최근 여러 나라에서 자본과 운영기술을 앞세운 GTO에게 항만 운영권과 개발권을 개방하고 있으며, 이들 GTO의 글로벌 네트워크 확충 전략은 각 국가의 항만 정책과 맞물려 항만의 발전에 큰 역할을 하고 있다. 근래 급성장하고 있는 중국의 항만 시장은 GTO에게 엄청난 기회로 부상하고 있다. 그러나 현재로서는 GTO의 해외 진출 시 어떤 요인이 주요하게 작용하는지에 대한 연구가 미비하고, 신규 터미널 후보지 선택에 대한 정형화된 방법론이 없는 실정이다. 이런 배경에서 본 연구에서는 GTO의 해외 진출 시 고려되는 요소들을 평가해보고 이들 평가요소들을 이용하여 중국항만을 대상으로 신규 터미널 후보지를 평가해 보고자 하였다. 먼저 선행연구를 토대로 항만의 발전 잠재력을 포함한 14개의 측정변수들을 선정하였고, 요인분석(factor analysis) 방법을 통하여 운영 및 화물 창출 능력, 항로 보유 및 교역량, 대형선 기항 가능성 및 연계성, 기존 인프라 활용가능성의 4가지로 추출할 수 있었다. 그리고 퍼지계층분석법을 통하여 각 평가요인 및 측정변수들의 가중치를 산정하였다. 그 결과 4개의 평가요인 중 운영 및 화물 창출능력(0.343)이 가장 중요한 요인으로 선정되었으며, 14개의 측정변수 중 항만의 발전 잠재력(0.107)이 가장 중요한 변수로 나타났으며, 다음으로 해당 항만의 환적화물 비중(0.104), 대형선박의 기항빈도(0.090), 다양한 항로의 보유(0.089), 항만의 교역량 정도(0.087) 순으로 파악되었다. 평가요소를 이용하여 중국 항만을 평가해 본 결과 상위 5위권 중국 항만 중 상하이항(0.307)로 가장 우수한 항만으로 확인되었다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.141-159
• /
• 2020

Container terminals at Gwangyang Port are operated by three container operators: A, B and C. Ultimately, there is consensus that a single operator should operate all terminals so that economies of scale can be achieved even in the operation of the container terminal. Integration between operators has a positive effect on both operators and shipping companies. From the operator's point of view, overlapping fixed costs between operators can be unified, reducing overall costs and utilizing spare facilities. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of the shipping company, it is possible to ensure stable use of the port facilities and always allow berthing, reduce days on demurrage and ship waiting, and provide one-stop service for work. However, existing cases of operators' integration or relocation of terminals remained to estimate the expected effects of alternatives, emphasizing only the financial point of view. The port terminal is a large system, and it is important to consider that it is an aggregate of major logistics facilities and equipment. Moreover, if the estimation can be made by quantifying the expected effect, the justification of the terminals' relocation can be further emphasized. Therefore, it is very important to estimate the expected effect from the viewpoint of systemic operation. Moreover, the need for operators' integration can be further emphasized if it can be estimated through quantification of expected effects. Currently, three alternatives are considered as alternatives to the terminals' relocation, and in this study, the optimal plan was derived for the 3 alternatives by the linear planning model of the minimum shuttle transportation cost in the terminal. The optimal plan is alternative 2, which shows the most advantageous integration effect in terms of expected effects. Alternative 2 integrates the B terminal into the C terminal, and the A terminal operates independently as it is.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2023년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.118-120
• /
• 2023

Increasing port competition driven by the containerisation has motivated ports and terminals to focus on their performance to efficiently utilise the available resources and to make strategic decisions in port development and expansion. With both inter-port andintra-port competition increasing in the port of Colombo, this study aims to measure the efficiency of the container terminals in Colombo comparing to terminals in the port of Busan using the DEA window analysis to determine their operational efficiency and to provide suggestions for future port development activities. Multiple window analyses were conducted using CCR and BCC models with different orientations and window lengths to compare the efficiencies of 11 DMUs in both ports during the period from 2015-2019 to measure the efficiencies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results revealed the largest terminal operator, PNC in Busan, to be the most efficient overall, while the second highest efficiency was recorded by one of the smallest terminal operators, SAGT in Colombo, among the sample. Although use of DEA in port performance measurement has been popular for many years, efficiency measurements in the port of Colombo, the main hub port in the South Asian region, has not been comprehensively studied so far.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2019년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.240-241
• /
• 2019

전 세계 물동량 둔화 및 항만 간 경쟁이 심화되는 가운데, 항만의 환경규제 강화 및 자동화 및 스마트화가 요구되면서 항만산업의 비용증가 요인들이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 항만산업의 주요 주체인 우리나라 컨테이너터미널 운영사의 비용자료를 직접 수집하였으며, 이를 통해 컨테이너터미널 운영사의 비용 구조적 특성을 분석하였다. 터미널 운영 규모별, 지역별, 부두 특성별 비용구조의 차이점을 살펴보고 그에 따른 시사점을 제시하였다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제35권7호
• /
• pp.589-596
• /
• 2011

Terminal market has rapidly crashed and market rates have taken a sharp plunge. The substantial throughput decrease resulted from the world economic downturn has been a finishing blow to the terminal operators in Busan. Every terminal operator is taking cost saving as its first priority and accelerating structural reform and downsizing. Under the desperate situation, the need of effective cost analysis would be highly required to effectively control operation cost and to develop new services to satisfy the different needs of the customers. Furthermore, terminal operators could reduce unnecessary activities and concentrate their resource on the more cost-effective process through the operation cost analysis. In order to suggest a new framework of the cost control of container terminals, this paper seeks to analyze terminal costs based on ABC approach by processing actual data.