• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.287-294
• /
• 2008

Recently, amount of cargoes from main ports in Northeast Asia have rapidly increased and as well surplus port development in same region corresponded with the boom in external trade that resulted from successful export-oriented economics strategy by China, Japan and South Korea. To cope with this business circumstances, a certain form of port alliance is desperately needed to provide a suitable service to customer and establish their countervailing power against the shipping alliance. Nevertheless, Incheon seaport has not made a definite port alliance system with main ports in Northern China yet. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the key success factors to form a port alliance through examining previous studies. We have benchmarked previous studies which are related to main ports in global region and the questionnaire on customers of ports. By studying this, we are able to suggest a few strategies for forming successful port alliance to enhance Incheon port's capabilities in the long term plan. As a policy proposal, this study suggests Incheon port and main ports in Northern China should construct a logistics infrastructure through mutual investment and provide an incentive system when the ocean carrier makes port call to both ports.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2006년도 추계학술대회 논문집(제1권)
• /
• pp.235-240
• /
• 2006

글로벌 생산네트워크의 변화로 인해 광양항은 새로운 전략의 수립이 요구된다. 특히, 무역의 패턴이 중국, 일본, 한국을 포함한 아시아의 경제적 성장에 따라 동북아지역 집중됨에 따라 가격과 서비스 경쟁력을 가진 광양항은 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 요구에 대처해야하며, 변화하는 무역환경에서 다른 국가들과 경쟁해야 한다. 그러므로 본 연구의 목적은 광양항의 성장을 촉진하기 위한 포트얼라이언스 전략을 제안하는 것이다. 광양항의 물류비즈니스 모델에 대한 목적에 맞도록 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 진행방향과 중국과 일본의 대상 항만을 제공하였다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제36권5호
• /
• pp.409-418
• /
• 2012

컨테이너 선사들은 세계경제의 불황과 고유가가 지속되고 있는 상황에서 선박운영비용을 낮추기 위한 다각적인 노력들을 전개하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서, Grand Alliance는 극동 북미서안 서비스인 CCX와 극동 북미동안 서비스인 NCE에 서비스별 선박추가 투입대신에 Dedicated Feeder 투입을 하기로 결정하였다. 즉, 기간항로의 선박이 북중국항만에 기항하지 않고 환적항인 부산항에서 Feeder선을 통하여 환적 운송하게 된다. 본 연구에서는 전용피더 서비스 도입을 통한 환적의 경제성 효과를 확인하기 위하여 Grand Alliance 컨테이너 서비스의 실제 운영 자료에 대해 분석하였다. 이와 같은 전략을 통해 Grand Alliance의 'NCE, 'CCX'항로는 기간항로에 투입되는 선박의 감속운항이 가능하게 되어 선박 운영비의 절감 효과를 보이고 있다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.545-553
• /
• 2007

글로벌 생산네트워크의 변화로 인해 우리나라 주요 항만은 새로운 전략의 수립이 요구되고 있다. 무역 패턴의 변화로 인해 중국, 일본, 한국을 포함한 아시아의 경제적 성장이 급속히 이루어지고 있는 상황에서 동북아에 집중되는 항만 물동량을 흡수하기 위해 우리나라 중심 항만들의 환적기능 강화가 필요한 시점이다. 특히 동북아 포트얼라이언스를 활용한 환적기능 강화는 변화하는 무역환경에서 우리 중심항만들이 경쟁력 확보를 위한 기회가 될 수 있을 것이다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 부산항과 광양항 같은 우리나라 주요 항만들의 환적기능을 촉진하기 위한 포트얼라이언스 전략을 제안하고자 하는 것이다. 두 주요 항만의 물류비즈니스 모델 수립을 위해 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 방향과 중국과 일본의 후보 항만들을 제시하였다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제30권7호
• /
• pp.579-583
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this paper is to study a relationship between alliance success factors and performances of strategic alliance. In order to achieve the purpose of this research, factor analysis, reliability and validity and regression method are used. In conclusion, alliance success factors can be divided as mutual complementarity and information sharing factor, sharing and mutual agreement of vision and goal factor, performance management factor and culture and organization factor. According to regression results, all of four factors affects significantly dependent variables. Among them, mutual complementarity and information sharing mostly affects each dependent variable.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.115-148
• /
• 2005

In the liner market, a strategy is hard to sustain as competitors can easily imitate the strategy. For examples, when a number of shipping companies pursue this space exchange strategy in a liner market, their competitors are likely to build a cooperative alliance, following similar strategic pattern without any difficulty. Such strategic imitations are universal in international liner market. Therefore, the success of global alliance requires following critical considerations. First, the strategy of global alliance should be designed the way it gives the liner operators an economy of scale, which could be a key advantage in the competitive market. Second, thorough global alliance the lines should be able to improve their transport service through the reduction of operating costs and the business rationalization. The international alliance today is characterized by a strategic cooperation among a limited number of 'mega-carriers'. Such cooperation between the large-sized operators has come in many different forms. However, the trend has been towards the space exchange agreement, where a carrier on a route offers to another carrier a fixed number of spaces for a fixed period of time. the major carriers have been entered into groupings by integrating their services structures to increase market power. With reference to the above, this study has the following primary objectives: (1) to explore the present status of global alliance in liner shipping industry, (2) to prospect the future trend of the global alliance.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.267-283
• /
• 2019

This study analyzes how the port connectivity network has changed with the restructuring of the liner shipping alliance and explores the impact of these changes on network characteristics using social network analysis (SNA). While due to economies of scale, the scale of ports and liner shipping has expanded, the goal of shipping companies has changed to achieve cost-effectiveness due to the diseconomies of scale. Such changes in the environment have greatly affected ports according to the strategies of major liner alliances, and port centrality has shifted in response to restructuring in strategic alliances. This research confirmed that port centrality has continuously changed, and the reason for this phenomenon was analyzed through the derived main network centrality indices. This finding provides significant implications for port authorities and terminal operators to consider different perspectives when planning for sustainable growth and management.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.307-315
• /
• 2014

This paper aims to empirically examine how shipping companies can effectively acquire knowledge from their strategic alliance partners. This paper adopts cooperative network embeddedness mechanism, such as network density and tie closeness, as a channel through which to acquire more knowledge for shipping participants within a strategic alliance network. This study also examines the moderating role of competition between alliance partners in reinforcing the effectiveness of the cooperative relationships on the knowledge acquisition. Based on the literature, hypotheses to predict the aforementioned associations between cooperative network embeddedness and knowledge acquisition and the moderating role of competition in facilitating that association are established. A quantitative research method using survey data conducted in the Korean shipping industry was employed in order to empirically test the presented hypotheses. The results show that if players in a shipping alliance network are embedded in a dense network and have close relationships with their alliance partners, this helps to facilitate a greater degree of knowledge acquisition from the partners; and the impact of network density on the knowledge acquisition would be intensified with the higher level of competition between shipping companies.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권7호
• /
• pp.483-490
• /
• 2009

In recent years, shipping and ports industries are faced with enormous changes like globalization, market liberalization and borderless businesses. To cope with this competitive environment, a certain form of cooperation among ports is necessary to provide high quality of services and lower costs to establish their market power against shipping companies. The purpose of this study is to identify the motivation of the strategic alliances between ports and demonstrate the level of importance using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Among four motivations of the strategic alliances which are strategic motivation, economic motivation, operational motivation and marketing motivation, economic motivation is the most important factor for ports alliances than other factors. This is because economic motivation among strategic alliances allow ports in the same market to rationalize supply and demand, thus avoiding unnecessary over-supply and over-competition and also can reduce service costs by using comparative advantages of each partner which make costs cheaper.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.391-398
• /
• 2002

전략적 제휴는 기업의 경쟁우위를 확보하기 위한 중요한 경영전략으로 이용되며 많은 기업들이 경쟁기업과 다양한 형태의 제휴를 맺고 있다. 본 연구에서는 정기선해운에서 제휴유형간의 만족도에 차이가 있는지, 제휴유형별 성공요인의 중요도에 차이가 있는지, 제휴 유형간 성공요인의 중요도에 차이가 있는지 등에 대하여 실증분석을 하였다. 연구의 곁과 정기선사들은 제휴의 성과에 대하여 대체로 만족하고 있으며 제휴의 성공여부는 다양한 요인에 의하여 결정되며, 제휴의 유형에 따라 성공요인의 중요도에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.