• Title/Summary/Keyword: Policy comparison

Search Result 1,321, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2016 (2016년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Oh, Sarah Soyeon;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.90-97
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study investigated the healthcare status of South Korea and member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). By employing the position value for relative comparison index, healthcare status was measured through the following components: demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost. Statistical analysis was conducted through the Mann-Kendall test from analyzing trends from 2000 onwards. Results showed that while Korea, on average, scores higher than the OECD average in most of the investigated components, it is below average in certain indexes including primary care and mental health care. Considering the various health issues that have been raised about these indexes, it is important these components be improved upon by policy-makers.

Problem Findings Regarding the Legal Liability of Soil Contaminated Sites in Korea, and it's Policy Suggestion from a Comparison Study to U. S., U K., Germany, Netherlands, and Denmark's Policies (토양오염지역의 책임에 관한 우리 나라, 미국, 영국, 독일, 네덜란드, 덴마크 법과 제도의 비교 분석 및 우리 나라 정책개선방향)

  • Park, Yong-Ha;Park, Sang-Yeol;Yang, Jae-E.
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.31-57
    • /
    • 2004
  • Attempts were made to compare and analyze the policies of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark concerning Korea's major problems associated with legal liability of the contaminated sites. These countries were chosen from a feasible preliminary analysis of 18 countries of the EU and the U. S. The major problems were revealed based on the analysis of Korean legacy and legislation, which are summarized as follows i) lack of clear detailed technical and legal guidance to determine the responsible party or parties of contaminated sites, ii) no distinction between the strict and non strict legal liability of innocent land owners, iii) no clearly set limit on retroactive legal liability. Comparison of the policies of countries chosen suggested improvements regarding these major problems as follows: i) activating national and international research on soil contamination prevention policy, ii) arranging distinct legal regulation between strict and non strict liability criteria, iii) establishing the limits on innocent and non strict liability, iv) establishing methodology and process of legal liability distribution and compensation, and v) establishing a legal process to redeem any benefit derived from remediation of contaminated sites with the public budget. Our policy suggestions above are not yet conclusive due to a lack of policy implementation simulation. Additional research is needed on aspects of social, economic and long term effects of the proposed policy directions. Nevertheless, application of the policy suggestions of this research would increase the efficacy of Korean policy regarding the survey and remediation of the potentially contaminated sites.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study of Korea and Qingdao's Long-term Care Insurance Policy and its Enlightenment (청도와 한국의 장기요양보험 제도 비교연구와 시사점 검토)

  • Kim, Keunhong;MENG, Xiangqi
    • 한국노년학
    • /
    • v.38 no.3
    • /
    • pp.453-466
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to explore the enlightenment of the Korean long-term care insurance policy on Qingdao's long-term care insurance policy through policy comparison. China and Korea are very similar in terms of cultural background, living habits, and population structure. Therefore, the successful experience of Korean long-term care insurance has great implications for Qingdao even China to build a long-term care insurance system. Through the literature review, this article compares the long-term care insurance policy implemented by Qingdao City and Korea in Gilbert & Terrell's social welfare policy analysis framework. With the comparison this article discusses about the existing problems of the current pilot policy system in Qingdao, such as lack of legislation support and financial independence, assessment standards are not detailed, and human resources are insufficient. The author raises five suggestions to improve Qingdao's long-term care policy as the conclusion of this paper: legislation support, detailed assessment standard, expand categories of benefits, enrich delivery network, optimize financing sources.

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2017 (2017년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Lee, Hyeon Ji;Oh, Sarah Soyeon;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.131-138
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study was to compare the health status of South Korea with those of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and examine the trends. Position vAlue for Relative Comparison (PARC) was used as a gauge for comparison, and five sectors of the health care system were measured: demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost. The Mann-Kendall test was used as a statistical analysis method to examine trend of PARC values obtained from 2000 to recent years. According to the results, the demand, supply, accessibility, and quality sectors were higher than the OECD average, while the cost was lower than the average. However, there is a recent trend of sharp increases in health care costs. Some indicators: health employment, quality of primary care and mental health care were lower than the OECD average, and health determinants showed a worsening trend. Therefore, policy-makers need to take this into account and make efforts for sustainable health care.

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2018 (2018년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Youn, Hin Moi;Lee, Hyeon Ji;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.217-224
    • /
    • 2021
  • The objective of this study is to investigate the healthcare status of South Korea and other member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) using OECD health statistics 2020. We employed the position value for relative comparison index to measure the healthcare status in five following components: demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost. The Mann-Kendall test was used to analyze for increasing or decreasing trend of the position value for relative comparison values from 2000 to the recent year. Results showed that Korea was positioned above than the OECD median values in most of components, but lower than the median values in certain indices including healthcare employment, primary care, and mental health care. This study sheds some light on healthcare issues to be improved and the policy-makes can take into account for prior setting process.

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2019: Comparison with Countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Park, Minah;Youn, Hin-Moi;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.113-121
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study aims to compare the healthcare status of South Korea and other member of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) using the OECD health statistics 2021. We used the position value for relative comparison (PARC) index to measure the five elements of the healthcare system, demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost. For the statistical analysis, Mann-Kendall test was performed to examine the trend of the PARC values from 2000 to the most recent year. The results showed that supply, demand, accessibility, and quality were above median than the OECD median and the cost was below median. In sectors such as primary care, health employment and mental health care were below median average. With these result, necessary steps for a sustainable healthcare should be taken into effort by policy makers.

A Study on comparison with policy of Korea.China.Japan to promote Game-Industry (한.중.일 3국의 게임산업 활성화 정책 비교)

  • Lee Ji-Won;Ryu Seuc-Ho;Kyung Byung-Pyo
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • 2005.05a
    • /
    • pp.74-80
    • /
    • 2005
  • More government's policy supports than current are necessary time first of all because Korea game industry is growing vigorously centering around On-line game and Mobile-game. Korea Government is progressing game industry promotion policies actively, and these may accelerate developed speed of Korea game industry in the near future. But, we are time that feedback of government's game industrial policies is necessary now through comparison with game industry policy of Northeast Asia area game Industry policy of area. Therefore, In this paper we did study improvement assignment of Korea game industrial policy through comparison with Game industrial policies of the Korea, China and Japan.

  • PDF

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries, 2015 (2015년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교)

  • Chae, Wonjenog;Lee, Sang Ah;Park, Eun-Cheol
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.98-103
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study aims to evaluate the status of Korean healthcare among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries and to monitor the trend of health care status since 2000. The position value for relative comparison (PARC) index was selected to gauge the level of healthcare status in demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost as per healthcare policy aspects. The Mann-Kendall test was conducted to allocate healthcare status of Korea since 2000. The PARC values indicate strength and weakness of Korean healthcare system by the mathematical comparisons. Korea positioned higher in demand, supply, accessibility, and quality. Yet, there are shortages in human resources and primary care. In conclusion, we suggest utilizing this study provides evidence to prioritize health care problems that can lead to establishing healthcare policy.

Research Trends on Literature Reviews in Scopus Journals by Authors from Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Singapore, and Malaysia: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2003 to 2022

  • Prakoso Bhairawa Putera;Amelya Gustina
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.304-322
    • /
    • 2023
  • Text data mining ('big data methods') is one of the most widely used approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, text data mining on Scopus databases or Web of Science (WoS). Text data mining is widely used to collect literature for later bibliometric analysis, and in the end, it becomes a literature review article. Therefore, in this article, we reveal the trend of publication of literature reviews in Scopus journals from Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Singapore, and Malaysia. This article describes two essential parts, namely 1) a comparison of international publication trends and subject area of literature review publications, and 2) a comparison of Top 5 for Authors, Affiliation, Source Title, and Collaboration Country.

Study on Priorities of Regional Climate Change Policy (기후변화정책 우선순위 연구)

  • Hwang, Eunjoo;Choi, Yun Hyeok;Kim, Jong Dae
    • Journal of Environmental Science International
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.589-601
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study aims to analyze the priority of regional climate change policy utilizing AHP (analytic hierarchy process) at the area of Metropolitan City of Incheon. It derives four factors at first hierarchical level, at which level the analysis of pair-wise comparison indicates that industrial sector, energy sector, climate change response, and green culture policy are considered important in that order. It also ends up with sixteen factors at second level. The result of comparison analysis between all factors reveals that investment promotion in green technology R&D is considered the most significant factor of all, followed by establishment of green enterprise support system, electricity-efficiency enhancement support project and build-up of green culture policy governance. The result implies that diverse promotional policies have to incorporate business, institutional, and cultural aspects for sustainable climate change policy of regions. The contribution of this study is that it highlights the need to include regional characteristics in deciding priority among policy options for them to be effective.