• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2003년도 제27회 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.41-41
• /
• 2003

Purpose: Even if the wedge filter is widely used for the radiation therapy to modify the photon beam intensity, the wedged photon beam dose calculation is not so easy. Radiation therapy planning systems (RTPS) have been used the empirical or semi-analytical methods such as attenuation method using wedge filter parameters or wedge filter factor obtained from measurement. However, these methods can cause serious error in penumbra region as well as in edge region. In this study, we propose the dose calculation algorithm for wedged field to minimize the error especially in the outer beam region. Materials and Method: Modified intensity by wedge filter was calculated using tissue-maximum ratio (TMR) and scatter-maximum ratio (SMR) of wedged field. Profiles of wedged and non-wedged direction was also used. The result of new dose calculation was compared with measurement and the result from attenuation method. Results: Proposed algorithm showed the good agreement with measurement in the high dose-gradient region as well as in the inner beam region. The error was decreased comparing to attenuation method. Conclusion: Although necessary beam data for the RTPS commissioning was increased, new algorithm would guarantee the improved dose calculation accuracy for wedged field. In future, this algorithm could be adopted in RTPS.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.103-114
• /
• 1999

본 연구에서는 외부조사 광자선에 대한 3차원 선량계산 알고리즘 모델을 개발하기 위한 기초 연구로서 기존의 2D 선량 계산 알고리즘을 확장시켜 비동일 평면 조사가 가능한 2.5D 선량계산 모델을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 3차원 치료계획 및 선량계산에 적합하도록 환자 및 조사빔에 대한 3차원 좌표계 시스템을 정의하고, 이들 간의 좌표변환식을 유도하였다. 선량계산 알고리즘으로는 "Clarkson-Cunningham" 의 2D 광자선량 계산 알고리즘을 3차원으로 확장시켜 정형 조사면 및 비정형 조사면에 대한 선량계산과 wedge filter에 대한 선량계산이 가능하도록 하였고, Batho 방식을 적용하여 비 균질 보정을 구현하였다. 선량계산의 정확도를 평가하기 위해, AAPM TG #23 에 제시된 절차에 따라 자료에 제시된 4MV 광자선에 대한 실험 값과 본 연구에서 계산된 결과를 비교한 결과, 정형조 사면에 대한 PDD(percent depth dose)는 buildup 영역을 제외하면 $\pm$1% 이내, 비정형 조사면의 경우 $\pm$3% 이내에서 실험값과 일치하였다. 또한, wedge filter에 대한 PDD 및 profile은 $\pm$3% 이내, 45$^{\circ}$ oblique 입사빔에 대한 선량은 $\pm$4% 이내에서 실험값과 일치하였다. 비균질 보정의 경우 Lung/water 경계에서 7% 과소 평가되었고, Bone/water 경계에서 3% 과대 평가되는 것으로 나타났다. 이들 결과를 종합해 볼 때, 비균질 보정을 제외하고는 비교적 정확하게 선량을 계산하는 것으로 평가되었다. 추후 대부분의 상용 2.5D 치료계획시스템 (radiation treatment planning system; RTP)들이 비균질 보정 방법으로 사용하고 있는 Equivalent TAR(tissue-air ratio) 방식을 구현시키고자 하며, 본 연구에서 구현된 선량계산 모듈을 교육 및 연구용으로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대 한다.것으로 기대 한다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.54-62
• /
• 2020

Dose calculation algorithms play an important role in radiation therapy and are even the basis for optimizing treatment plans, an important feature in the development of complex treatment technologies such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy. We reviewed the past and current status of dose calculation algorithms used in the treatment planning system for radiation therapy. The radiation-calculating dose calculation algorithm can be broadly classified into three main groups based on the mechanisms used: (1) factor-based, (2) model-based, and (3) principle-based. Factor-based algorithms are a type of empirical dose calculation that interpolates or extrapolates the dose in some basic measurements. Model-based algorithms, represented by the pencil beam convolution, analytical anisotropic, and collapse cone convolution algorithms, use a simplified physical process by using a convolution equation that convolutes the primary photon energy fluence with a kernel. Model-based algorithms allowing side scattering when beams are transmitted to the heterogeneous media provide more precise dose calculation results than correction-based algorithms. Principle-based algorithms, represented by Monte Carlo dose calculations, simulate all real physical processes involving beam particles during transportation; therefore, dose calculations are accurate but time consuming. For approximately 70 years, through the development of dose calculation algorithms and computing technology, the accuracy of dose calculation seems close to our clinical needs. Next-generation dose calculation algorithms are expected to include biologically equivalent doses or biologically effective doses, and doctors expect to be able to use them to improve the quality of treatment in the near future.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.1685-1689
• /
• 2016

Physical wedges still can be used as missing tissue compensators or filters to alter the shape of isodose curves in a target volume to reach an optimal radiotherapy plan without creating a hotspot. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric properties of physical wedges filters such as off-axis photon fluence, photon spectrum, output factor and half value layer. The photon beam quality of a 6 MV Primus Siemens modified by 150 and 450 physical wedges was studied with BEAMnrc Monte Carlo (MC) code. The calculated present depth dose and dose profile curves for open and wedged photon beam were in good agreement with the measurements. Increase of wedge angle increased the beam hardening and this effect was more pronounced at the heal region. Using such an accurate MC model to determine of wedge factors and implementation of it as a calculation algorithm in the future treatment planning systems is recommended.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.138-147
• /
• 2005

몬테칼로 선량계산 시 적절한 정확도를 얻기 위해서는 계산입자수를 늘려야 하고 그로 인해 계산 시간이 오래 걸리게되므로 일상적 치료계획의 선량계산 방법으로 이용되지 못했다. 본 연구에서는 몬테칼로 모의실험 시 계산입자 수를 줄여서 선량계산을 수행한 후 잡음 감소 필터를 적용하여 선량계산 결과를 개선하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국소 최소자승 잡음 감소 필터를 제작하고 광자선 및 전자선 균질/비균질 팬텀 내 선량계산 결과에 대하여 적용하여 선택적 여과를 수행하였으며 그 유효성을 등선량 곡선 비교 및 감마시험을 통하여 검증하였다. 연구 결과 통계적 불확실도를 2$\%$ 이내로 유지하기 위해 필요한 계산입자수의 10$\%$ 이하의 계산입자 수를 이용하여 몬테칼로 선량계산 뒤 후처리한 결과가 기준계산 입자수를 이용하여 얻은 몬테칼로 선량계산 결과와 유사해질 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.38-46
• /
• 2001

Purpose : The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of tissue inhomogeneities when appling to contrast medium among Homogeneous, Batho and ETAR dose calculation method in RTP system. Method and Material : We made customized heterogeneous phantom it filled with water or contrast medium slab. Phantom scan data have taken PQ 5000 (CT scanner, Marconi, USA) and then dose was calculated in 3D RTP (AcQ-Plan, Marconi, USA) depends on dose calculation algorithm (Homogeneous, Batho, ETAR). The dose comparisons were described in terms of 2D isodose distribution, percent depth dose data, effective path length and monitor unit. Also dose distributions were calculated with homogeneous and inhomogeneous correction algorithm, Batho and ETAR, in each patients with different clinical sites. Results : Result indicated that Batho and ETAR method gave rise to percent depth dose deviation $1.5{\sim}2.7\%,\;2.3{\sim}3.5\%$ (6MV, field size $10{\times}10cm^2$) in each status with and without contrast medium. Also show that effective path lengths were more increase in contrast status (23.14 cm) than Non-contrast (22.07 cm) about $4.9\%$ or 10.7 mm (In case Hounsfield Unit 270) and these results were similary showned in each patient with different clinical site that was lung. prostate, liver and brain region. Concliusion : In conclusion we shown that the use of inhomogeneity correction algorithm for dose calculation in status of injected contrast medium can not represent exact dose at GTV region. These results mean that patients will be more irradiated photon beam during radiation therapy.

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2004년도 제29회 추계학술대회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.43-46
• /
• 2004

The commissioning of a treatment planning system of model-based dose calculation algorithm requires a lot of parameters to be selected to fit measured data, in which process physical insights for the parameters are often forgotten. We present the photon beam commissioning of Pinnacle$^3$ with the help of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and evaluate the parameters Pinnacle$^3$ demands. Even though the MC calculation produces reasonable values for the commissioning, the thorough physical basis of the Pinnacles$^3$'s commissioning process is needed to use the MC derived parameters directly.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2017

Background: The purpose of this study is to assign an appropriate density to virtual phantom for 2D diode array detector with different dose calculation algorithms to guarantee the accuracy of patient-specific QA. Materials and Methods: Ten VMAT plans with 6 MV photon beam and ten VMAT plans with 15 MV photon beam were selected retrospectively. The computed tomography (CT) images of MapCHECK2 with MapPHAN were acquired to design the virtual phantom images. For all plans, dose distributions were calculated for the virtual phantoms with four different materials by AAA and AXB algorithms. The four materials were polystyrene, 455 HU, Jursinic phantom, and PVC. Passing rates for several gamma criteria were calculated by comparing the measured dose distribution with calculated dose distributions of four materials. Results and Discussion: For validation of AXB modeling in clinic, the mean percentages of agreement in the cases of dose difference criteria of 1.0% and 2.0% for 6 MV were $97.2%{\pm}2.3%$, and $99.4%{\pm}1.1%$, respectively while those for 15 MV were $98.5%{\pm}0.85%$ and $99.8%{\pm}0.2%$, respectively. In the case of 2%/2 mm, all mean passing rates were more than 96.0% and 97.2% for 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively, regardless of the virtual phantoms of different materials and dose calculation algorithms. The passing rates in all criteria slightly increased for AXB as well as AAA when using 455 HU rather than polystyrene. Conclusion: The virtual phantom which had a 455 HU values showed high passing rates for all gamma criteria. To guarantee the accuracy of patent-specific VMAT QA, each institution should fine-tune the mass density or HU values of this device.

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2002년도 Proceedings
• /
• pp.291-293
• /
• 2002

Accurate dose calculation in radiation treatment planning is most important for successful treatment. Since human body is composed of various materials and not an ideal shape, it is not easy to calculate the accurate effective dose in the patients. Many methods have been proposed to solve the inhomogeneity and surface contour problems. Monte Carlo simulations are regarded as the most accurate method, but it is not appropriate for routine planning because it takes so much time. Pencil beam kernel based convolution/superposition methods were also proposed to correct those effects. Nowadays, many commercial treatment planning systems, including Pinnacle and Helax-TMS, have adopted this algorithm as a dose calculation engine. The purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of the dose calculated from pencil beam kernel based treatment planning system Helax-TMS comparing to Monte Carlo simulations and measurements especially in inhomogeneous region. Home-made inhomogeneous phantom, Helax-TMS ver. 6.0 and Monte Carlo code BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc were used in this study. Dose calculation results from TPS and Monte Carlo simulation were verified by measurements. In homogeneous media, the accuracy was acceptable but in inhomogeneous media, the errors were more significant.

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2002년도 Proceedings
• /
• pp.119-120
• /
• 2002

The aim is to urge the need of elaborate commissioning of 3D RTP system from the firsthand experience. A 3D RTP system requires so much data such as beam data and patient data. Most data of radiation beam are directly transferred from a 3D dose scanning system, and some other data are input by editing. In the process inputting parameters and/or data, no error should occur. For RTP system using algorithm-bas ed-on beam-modeling, careless beam-data processing could also cause the treatment error. Beam data of 3 different qualities of photon from two linear accelerators, patient data and calculated results were commissioned. For PDD, the doses by Clarkson, convolution, superposition and fast superposition methods at 10 cm for 10${\times}$10 cm field, 100 cm SSD were compared with the measured. An error in the SCD for one quality was input by the service engineer. Whole SCD defined by a physicist is SAD plus d$\sub$max/, the value was just SAD. That resulted in increase of MU by 100${\times}$((1_d$\sub$max//SAD)$^2$-1)%. For 10${\times}$10 cm open field, 1 m SSD and at 10 cm depth in uniform medium of relative electron density (RED) 1, PDDs for 4 algorithms of dose calculation, Clarkson, convolution, superposition and fast-superposition, were compared with the measured. The calculated PDD were similar to the measured. For 10${\times}$10 cm open field, 1 m SSD and at 10 cm depth with 5 cm thick inhomogeneity of RED 0.2 under 2 cm thick RED 1 medium, PDDs for 4 algorithms were compared. PDDs ranged from 72.2% to 77.0% for 4 MV X-ray and from 90.9% to 95.6% for 6 MV X-ray. PDDs were of maximum for convolution and of minimum for superposition. For 15${\times}$15 cm symmetric wedged field, wedge factor was not constant for calculation mode, even though same geometry. The reason is that their wedge factor is considering beam hardness and ray path. Their definition requires their users to change the concept of wedge factor. RTP user should elaborately review beam data and calculation algorithm in commissioning.