• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제57권2호
• /
• pp.79-96
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 대표적인 OPR(Open Peer Review) 플랫폼인 F1000Research에서 사회과학분야의 논문 585건을 대상으로 개방형 동료 심사 결과를 분석하고 피인용, 알트메트릭스와 어떠한 관련성을 보이는지 확인하였다. 더불어 논문의 활용이 피인용에 미치는 영향 관계 내에서 심사 점수가 조절효과(Moderating effect)를 나타내는지 검증함으로써, OPR 환경에서 고품질로 평가된 논문이 피인용을 촉진할 수 있는지 확인하였다. 분석 결과 첫 번째, 승인과 조건부 승인된 논문 그룹 간에 피인용 횟수에 유의미한 차이가 나타나지 않았지만, 환산된 심사 점수와 피인용 횟수는 유의한 정(+)의 상관성(r= 0.40 ~ 0.60)을 나타냈다. 두번째, 심사 점수는 알트메트릭스와도 약한 상관성을 나타내 심사자의 품질 평가 결과는 피인용과 사회적 영향을 약하게 예측할 수 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 마지막으로 심사 점수는 논문의 활용을 피인용으로 이어지게 하는데 유의한 양의 방향의 조절효과 (B=1.69, P < 0.01)를 수행하며, 조건부 효과 검사 결과 가장 고품질로 평가된 논문 집단에서 가장 큰 효과(B=11.32, 95% CI [10.57, 12.08])를 나타내는 것으로 검증되었다. 따라서 공개된 심사 결과는 연구자들의 우수 논문 선별을 도와 인용을 유도하는데 도움을 줄 수 있는 것으로 파악되었다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.5-24
• /
• 2022

과학지식 생산 유통의 투명성, 효율성, 신속성을 제고하기 위하여 새로운 학술 출판 모델이 시도되면서, 동료 심사 이력의 검증과 개방을 위한 피어 리뷰 플렛폼도 활성화되고 있다. Publons는 3백만명 이상의 전 세계 연구자들의 동료 심사 이력을 추적해 검증하고 공개할 뿐 아니라 업적으로 인정하기 위한 글로벌 플렛폼이다. 본 연구는 Publons를 활용해 국제 학술지 심사 위원으로 활동하는 국내 대학 소속 연구자 579명을 선별해 동료 심사 활동을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 첫 번째, 국제 학술지에서 활발한 심사 활동을 하는 국내 연구자는 공학, 의약학 분야에 많으며, 대부분의 분야에서 높은 국제 학술지 출판 실적을 보유한 조교수급 이상의 교수들인 것으로 나타났다. 두 번째, 모든 학문 분야에서 극단적으로 높은 심사 논문수를 보이는 소수의 심사자가 존재하였으며, 심사자의 신분, 나이, 국적에 따라서 심사 논문수와 심사 보고서 길이에 유의미한 차이는 존재하지 않았다. 마지막으로 심사자의 심사 논문수와 SCI 급 출판 논문수 사이에는 약한 상관성(r = 0.311)이 존재했지만, 많은 연구실적을 보유한 연구자가 그만큼 많은 국제 학술지 심사 활동을 한다고 말하기 어려운 것으로 분석되었다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.16-30
• /
• 2015

The term megajournal is used to describe publication platforms, like PLOS ONE, that claim to incorporate peer review processes and web technologies that allow fast review and publishing. These platforms also publish without the constraints of periodic issues and instead publish daily. We conducted a yearlong bibliometric profile of a sample of articles published in the first several months after the launch of PeerJ, a peer reviewed, open access publishing platform in the medical and biological sciences. The profile included a study of author characteristics, peer review characteristics, usage and social metrics, and a citation analysis. We found that about 43% of the articles are collaborated on by authors from different nations. Publication delay averaged 68 days, based on the median. Almost 74% of the articles were coauthored by males and females, but less than a third were first authored by females. Usage and social metrics tended to be high after publication but declined sharply over the course of a year. Citations increased as social metrics declined. Google Scholar and Scopus citation counts were highly correlated after the first year of data collection (Spearman rho = 0.86). An analysis of reference lists indicated that articles tended to include unique journal titles. The purpose of the study is not to generalize to other journals but to chart the origin of PeerJ in order to compare to future analyses of other megajournals, which may play increasingly substantial roles in science communication.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2014

Purpose - The purposes of this editorial review are twofold: firstly, to introduce the four flagship international journals of the Korea Distribution Science Association(KODISA): the Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), the Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB), the East Asian Journal of Business Management(EAJBM), and the Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business(JAFEB), and secondly, to identify the direction of the KODISA journals and the roles and responsibilities of the editors of the KODISA journals. Research design, data, and methodology - To achieve the goals, firstly, this review paper addresses the current progress of the four KODISA journals: JDS, JIDB, EAJBM, and JAFEB. Secondly, this paper defines the aims and missions of the four KODISA journals. JDS publishes the articles of examining past, current, and emerging trends and concerns in the area of distribution science and economics, logistics and SCM, transportation, distribution channel management, distribution innovation and information technology, merchandising and procurement, distribution and marketing, consumer behavior, and manufacturing, wholesaling, and retailing. JDS publishes both quantitative and qualitative research as well as scholarly commentaries, case studies, book reviews and other types of reports relating to all aspects of distribution. JIDB publishes the articles of examining past, current, and emerging trends and concerns in the areas of industry and corporate behavior, industry policy making, industrial distribution and business, e-commerce, and service industry. EAJBM publishes empirical and theoretical research papers as well as scholarly commentaries, case studies, book reviews, and other types of reports relating to all aspects of East Asian business and economy. JAFEB publishes original research analysis and inquiry into the contemporary issues of finance, economics and business management in Asia, including Central Asia, East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Middle East. The mission of JAFEB is to bring together the latest theoretical and empirical finance, economics and business management research in Asian markets. The audiences of the KODISA journals include higher education institutions, scholars, industry researchers and practitioners, scientists, economists, and policy makers throughout the world. The main mission of the KODISA journals is to provide an intellectual platform for international scholars, promote interdisciplinary studies in social sciences and economics, and become leading journals in the social science and economics category in the world. Thirdly, this paper addresses the current status of indexing in major databases of the KODISA journals, namely: Cabell's Directories, EBSCO, SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Social Sciences Citation Index^® (SSCI, Thomson Reuters). Fourthly, this paper identifies the roles and responsibilities of the editors of the KODISA journals as the following: (1) Make sure that the journal be published in a timely manner and in international standards both in print and online versions. (2) Maintain the online homepage of the journal is always accessible to, and (3) Make sure that every article should go through a peer review process that meets international standards. Findings and conclusion - To accomplish the goals and missions of the KODISA journals, the editors of the KODISA journals must work together to publish high scholarly journals that meet international standards of journal publications.