• Title/Summary/Keyword: Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Potential

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

EEG Current Source Imaging using VEP Data Recorded inside a 3.0T MRI Magnet

  • Han Jae Y.;Choi Young H.;Im Chang H.;Kim Tae-S.;Lee Soo Y.
    • Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.26 no.2
    • /
    • pp.95-99
    • /
    • 2005
  • We have performed EEG current source imaging on the cortical surface using visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded inside a 3.0 T MRI magnet. In order to remove ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifacts in the VEPs, an improved BCG template subtraction technique is devised. Using the cortically constrained current source imaging technique and pattern-reversal visual stimulations, we have obtained current source maps from 10 subjects. To validate the EEG current source imaging inside the magnet, we have compared the current source maps to the ones obtained outside the magnet. The experimental results demonstrate that there is a strong correspondence between the current source maps, proving that current source imaging is feasible with the evoked potentials recorded inside a 3.0 T MRI magnet.

Study about PR-VEP Characteristics on Perception Function and Judgement Function of MBTI (MBTI의 인식기능(S/N), 판단기능(T/F)에 대한 PR-VEP 특성연구)

  • Seol, Jee-Yong;Park, Pyong-Woon
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.16 no.8
    • /
    • pp.5485-5491
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate PR-VEP characteristics on the perception function(S/N) and the judgement function(T/F) of MBTI. The 136 study participants, over 20 years old adults, were examined by PR-VEP and MBTI test for two months in July and August in 2013. PR-VEP was conducted in O1 and O2 by 32 channels EEG system and MBTI test was measured by Form-M online. We found that the time interval(Duration) between N75 and P100 of PR-VEP was 5.49 ms significantly shorter in the group preferring S indicator. And the latency until N75 was 4.83 ms significantly shorter in O1 and 4.27 ms shorter in O2 in the group preferring F indicator. According to these, the characteristics of groups preferring S and F indicator have influence on visual cognitive function, which is meaningful that the interpretation of brain-science can be used with recognition/judgement function of MBTI.