• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.2051-2055
• /
• 2014

Background: To evaluate the performance of Siriraj liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical neoplasia screening after increasing use of this technology. Materials and Methods: Cytological reports of 103,057 Siriraj-LBC specimens obtained in 2007-2009 were compared with those of 23,676 specimens obtained in 2006. Results: Comparing with the year 2006, the 2007-2009 patients were slightly older ($43.4{\pm}12.yr$ vs $42.7{\pm}12.2yr$, p <0.001), and their specimens had much lower proportion of unsatisfactory slides (OR=0.06, 95%CI 0.04-0.09) with comparable detection rates (3.96% vs 3.70%, p=0.052) but different proportions of various cytological abnormalities (p<0.001). The 2007-2009 Siriraj-LBC had a negative predictive value (NPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) of 97.6% and an overall positive predictive value (PPV) of 43.9%. The PPV for CIN2+ varied with types of abnormal cytology, from 13.7% to 93.8% in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), atypical glandular cells (AGC), to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), respectively. The PPVs for CIN2+ in ASCUS and LSIL were comparable, but the PPV for CIN1 was higher for LSIL than for ASCUS (41.63% vs 16.32%). Conclusions: Siriraj-LBC has demonstrated a stable detection rate and NPV for CIN2+ of >95% since the first year of use. The comparable PPVs for CIN2+ of ASCUS and LSIL suggests that these two conditions may undergo similar management; other cytological abnormalities need immediate evaluation.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.2165-2168
• /
• 2014

Background: Today, survival rate of patients with chronic renal failure/hemodialysis has increased so that chronic illnesses are more likely to occur. Cancer is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in such patients. Aim: In this study, physician attitudes were examined about cancer screening in patients with renal failure. Materials and Methods: This study was done by face to face questionnaire in the $27^{th}$ National Nephrology Congress to determine if the physicians dealing with chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted patients, recommend cancer screening or not and the methods of screening for cervix, prostate, breast and colon cancer. Results: One hundred and fifty six physicians were included in the survey. A total of 105 (67%) participants were male and the age of responders was $48{\pm}9$ years. About 29% were specialists in nephrology, 28% internal medicine, and 5% were other areas of expertise. Some 48% of participants were hemodialysis certified general practitioners. Patients were grouped as compensated chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted. Of the 156 responders, 128 (82%) physicians recommended breast cancer screening and the most recommended subgroup was hemodialysis patients (15%). The most preferred methods of screening were combinations of mammography, self breast examination and physicianbreast examination. 112 (72%) physicians recommended cervix cancer screening, and the most preferred method of screening was pap-smear. Colon cancer screening was recommended by 102 (65%) physicians and prostate screening by 109 (70%) physicians. The most preferred methods of screening were fecal occult blood test and PSA plus rectal digital test, respectively. Conclusions: It is not obvious whether cancer screening in renal failure patients is different from the rest of society. There is a variety of screening methods. An answer can be found to these questions as a result of studies by a common follow-up protocol and cooperation of nephrologists and oncologists.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.5519-5525
• /
• 2013

Background: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in Thai women after breast cancer. Currently, the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is the recommended procedure for cervical cancer screening in Thailand, but only a relatively small percentage of women follow this screening program. An alternative method to detect HPV genotypes associated with cervical cancer is self-sampling of urine, which is a more widely accepted method. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of HPV in Thai women using urine and cervical swabs and prevalence of HPV in Thai men using urine samples. Materials and Methods: Tumorigenic HPV detection was accomplished by electrochemical DNA chip and PCR/direct sequencing. In addition to HPV prevalence, we report the concordance between different methods and sample types. One-hundred and sixteen women and 100 men were recruited. Histological examination revealed normal cytology in 52 women, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) in 9, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in 24, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in 31. One-hundred men were classified as heterosexuals (n=45) and homosexuals (n=55). Results: The most prevalent HPV genotype in our study was HPV16. The HPV detection rate was generally lower in urine samples compared with cervical samples. Overall, there was good agreement for the detection of carcinogenic HPV from female cervical samples between the DNA chip and PCR/sequencing, with 88.8% total agreement and a kappa value of 0.76. In male urine samples, the level of agreement was higher in heterosexuals compared with homosexuals. Conclusions: Further improvement is required to increase an overall yield of HPV DNA detection in urine samples before clinical application of a urine-based HPV screening program. The electrochemical DNA chip test is a promising technique for carcinogenic HPV detection.

• 대한세포병리학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2007

Approximately 70% of cervical cancers are caused by HPV types 16/18 and thus the implementation of vaccination programmes with vaccines against HPV types 16/18 will have a major impact on the incidence of cervical cancer worldwide. However, this reduction will not be seen until several decades after full implementation of such vaccination programmes since the vaccines must be given to young adolescents before exposure to the virus and women who are already sexually active are not likely to be protected. Both GSK and Merck insist that even vaccinated women must continue to participate in regular cervical screening by the most sensitive method available since the vaccine can only give protection against up to 70% of cervical cancers. It is unlikely that the current vaccines will be modified to include additional high risk HPV types in the foreseeable future. While HPV testing is highly sensitive, it is not recommended for women under 30 years of age nor for vaccinated women. Additionally, HPV testing has poor specificity. The Digene Hybrid Capture 2 test is licensed for use only in conjunction with a cytology test, not as a stand-alone test, and the high risk panel has recognised cross reactivity with low risk HPV types. None of the other HPV test methods currently commercially available are FDA approved and all must be internally validated before use. This makes comparison of test results between laboratories difficult. The most sensitive and specific screening test currently available for women of all ages is the Cytyc ThinPrep System consisting of the ThinPrep Pap Test (TPPT) and the ThinPrep Imaging System (Imager). The TPPT was the first LBC system approved by the US FDA in 1996 and there are about 4,000 processors in use worldwide. The Imager was FDA approved in 2003 and over 350 systems are in routine use, mainly in the US. 40% of TPPT in the US are processed on Imager. There is clear evidence in peer reviewed literature that the Imager increases laboratory productivity by 100% and growing evidence that Imager detects more high grade SIL than the conventional smear or manual evaluation of TPPT. This aspect is particularly important since the number of cytological abnormalities will decrease as vaccination programmes are implemented. Cytotechnologists will see fewer and fewer abnormal smears and their skills will be put at risk. By doubling throughput, Imager will allow cytotechnologists to maintain their skills.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.16-20
• /
• 2001

목적 : 제 3기 흉선종에서 수술후 방사선치료의 효과를 평가하고 최적의 방사선 치료 방법을 알아보고자 함이 본 연구의 목적이다. 대상 및 방법 : 1987년 6월부터 1999년 5월까지 본원에서 제 3기 흉선종으로 진단받고 수술후 방사선치료를 시행한 24명의 환자를 후향적으로 분석하였다. 1명은 완전 절제술을 시행받았고 17명은 불완전 절제술을 나머지 6명은 조직검사만을 시행받았다. 환자의 나이는 20세부터 62세의 분포를 나타내었고 평균연령은 47세였다. 남녀의 성비는 14대 10였다. 6 또는 10 MeV 리니악을 이용하여 방사선치료를 시행하였고 종격동 및 알려진 잔여병변부위를 조사하였다. 쇄골하 림프절은 조사야에 포함되지 않았다. 조사된 총 방사선 양은 30 내지 56 Gy였으며 한명만이 30 Gy를 조사 받았고 18명은 최소한 50 Gy이상을 조사 받았다. 추적기간은 12개월 내지 8년이었고 중앙값은 40개월였다. 결과 : 전체 환자에서 전반적인 국소제어율은 5년에 $67\%$였다. 1년, 3년 밑 5년 국소재발율은 각각 $18\%,\;28\%$ 및 $33\%$였다. 불완전 절제술 및 조직검사만을 시행받은 환자에서 국소제어율은 각각 $76\%$ 및 $33\%$였다. 5년 생존율은 관찰치가 $57\%$, 조정치가 $72\%$였다. 불완전 절제술을 시행받은 환자와 조직검사만을 시행받은 환자의 5년 생존율은 각각 $62\%$와 $30\%$였으나 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 결론 : 제 3기 흉선종환자에서 수술 후 방사선치료는 안전하고 효과적인 치료방법이라 사료된다. 수술시 절제면에 가깝거나 특히 불완전 절제를 시행받은 환자에서 수술 후 방사선치료가 도움을 주리라 생각된다.thasone점안액의 대체약물로 사용될 수 있을 것으로 평가된다.E 처리하여 얻어진 영상이 해부학적 구조를 판독하는데 도움이 죄었다. 결론 : GSE 영상의 재구성은 대조도를 증가 시킬뿐 아니라 인체내 관심부위의 농도분포를 별도로 재구성할 수 있으므로 이중방사선조사(double exposure)에 의해 발생되는 화질의 저하를 보정함으로써 화질 개선을 가능하게 하였다. Linacgram 화질 개선은 simulation image 및 치료계획에서 발생한 DRR과 multi-layer 중첩영상 분석에 사용할 수 있으며 영상 비교 시 치료부위의 신속하고 정밀한 확인을 가능하게 하였다.알 수 있었다. 시뮬레이터에서 DRR을 구현했을 때 각각의 치료 조건들에 대해 오차가 임상적용 범위 안에 있어서 이 팬톰을 이용하여 주기적인 QC/QA에 사용할 수 있음을 보였다.에서의 NOS2 mRNA의 발현을 시작으로 비교적 일관된 발현 양상을 보여 주었고 그에 따라 폐포세척액 내의 NO 및 TGF-$\beta$ 단백의 양이 변하였다. 그러나 예상과는 달리 56일 째에는 NOS2와 TGF-$\beta$가 모두 발현하여, 좀 더 많은 개체 수를 대상으로 장기간을 통해 발현 양상을 관찰할 필요성이 있으며, 이 연구를 바탕으로 NOS2 억제제를 사용하여 TGF-$\beta$의 발현 양상에 어떤 변화가 오는지에 대한 연구가 필요하다고 평가되었다.1)가 의미있는 인자로 나타났고, 재발율에 있어서는 CEA가 $\geq$5 ng/ml인 경우, SCC는 $\geq$2 ng/ml인 경우가 2$\~$3배 높은 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 방사선치료 후 Pap smear, CEA, SCC는 생존율과 재발율에 모두 비교적 의미있게 작용하는 예후인자로 나타나 앞으로 방사선치료 후 환자의 추적관찰시