• 제목/요약/키워드: PIDO

검색결과 35건 처리시간 0.016초

리드용 와이어의 생산성 향상을 위한 평압연 최적설계 (Optimal Design of flat rolling about Lead Wire for Productivity Improvement)

  • 박창형;김진호
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제18권5호
    • /
    • pp.29-34
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 논문에서는 압연 공정을 통해 리드용 와이어를 생산할 때 생산성을 향상시키기 위해 와이어의 직진 속도를 증가시키는 방법을 연구했다. 직진 속도를 증가시킬 때 가장 중요한 점은 와이어가 원래의 목적을 바르게 수행할 수 있는 것이다. 즉, 와이어의 직진 속도가 증가함과 동시에 균열이 발생하지 않으며, 치수 공차를 만족시켜야 한다. 하지만 와이어의 직진속도를 증가시키게 되면 기존의 압하량 보다 더 큰 수치를 주어야 하고 이는 와이어에 보다 큰 손상을 주어 표면에 무리를 주게 된다. 따라서 기존의 2단계 평압연 공정을 통해 생산되었던 와이어의 필요스펙을 충족시키면서 생산성 향상까지 도모할 수 있는 3단계 평압연 공정에 관해 연구하였다. 본 연구에서는 3단계 평압연 롤러의 압하량만을 변수로 가정하고 다른 조건은 현장 조건과 일치시킨다. 상용 PIDO(Process Integration and Design Optimization) 툴인 PIANO (Process Integration, Design and Optimization)를 통해 지정한 변수 3가지를 조작하면서 실험점을 분포하고 이를 바탕으로 최적설계를 진행하여 와이어의 생산성을 향상시킴과 동시에 필요 스펙인 최대 응력의 최소화가 가능하도록 설계되었다.

자동차용 안개등 커버의 사출성형 품질 향상을 위한 2 단계 설계 최적화 (Two-Stage Design Optimization of an Automotive Fog Blank Cover for Enhancing Its Injection Molding Quality)

  • 박창현;안희재;최동훈;표병기
    • 대한기계학회논문집A
    • /
    • 제34권8호
    • /
    • pp.1097-1103
    • /
    • 2010
  • 사출성형에서 사출압력은 제품의 특성을 결정하는 주요인자이므로 성형품의 품질 향상을 위해 사출압력은 최소화 되어야 한다. 또한 휨 변형과 웰드라인은 사출성형에서의 대표적인 불량요인으로 사출성형품의 품질 향상을 위해 방지되어야 한다. 본 논문에서는 사출성형품의 품질 향상을 위해 설계 절차를 2 단계로 나눈다. 첫 번째 설계에서는 공정조건을 제어하여 사출압력과 휨 변형을 최소화 하기 위해 직교배열표를 이용한 전산실험을 수행하고 이를 이용하여 근사모델을 생성한 후 최적설계를 수행한다. 두 번째 설계에서는 유동경로 개선을 통한 웰드라인의 발생을 방지하기 위해 해석모델의 두께를 변경하고 웰드라인 발생 유무를 평가한다. 이러한 설계절차를 통해 사출압력과 휨 변형을 최소화하면서 웰드라인을 방지하여 본 논문에서 제안한 설계방법의 유효성을 보이고자 한다.

해석 및 설계 프로세스 통합을 통한 차량 후륜 현가장치 최적화 (Optimal Vehicle Rear Suspension through Integration of Analysis and Design Process)

  • 김도원;박도현;이진화;신상하;최진호;최병렬;최동훈
    • 한국자동차공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.72-81
    • /
    • 2014
  • In this study, we perform the optimization of trailing arm bush in a vehicle rear suspension to improve the ride and handling performance. A design problem was formulated considering 2 objective functions and 7 constraints related to vehicle ride and handling performance. PIAnO, one of the PIDO (Process Integration and Design Optimization) tool, was used to automate analysis procedures and perform a design optimization. In order to assess relation between performances and design variables, we perform the DOE (Design of Experiments). To find the optimal solution, we used Progressive quadratic response surface method (PQRSM), one of the design optimization techniques equipped in PIAnO. As an optimization result, we got an optimal solution and could improve lateral force steer off-center by 43.0% while decreasing brake compliance at wheel center by 8.1%.

경량화를 위한 RBFr 메타모델 기반 A-필러와 패키지 트레이의 소재 선정 최적화 (Material Selection Optimization of A-Pillar and Package Tray Using RBFr Metamodel for Minimizing Weight)

  • 진성완;박도현;이갑성;김창원;양희원;김대승;최동훈
    • 한국자동차공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제21권5호
    • /
    • pp.8-14
    • /
    • 2013
  • In this study, we propose the method of optimally selecting material of front pillar (A-pillar) and package tray for minimizing weight while satisfying vehicle requirements on static stiffness and dynamic stiffness. First, we formulate a material selection optimization problem. Next, we establish the CAE procedure of evaluating static stiffness and dynamic stiffness. Then, to enhance the efficiency of design work, we integrate and automate the established CAE procedure using a commercial process integration and design optimization (PIDO) tool, PIAnO. For effective optimization, we adopt the approach of metamodel based approximate optimization. As a sampling method, an orthogonal array (OA) is used for selecting sampling points. The response values are evaluated at the sampling points and then these response values are used to generate a metamodel of each response using the radial basis function regression (RBFr). Using the RBFr models, optimization is carried out an evolutionary algorithm that can handle discrete design variables. Material optimization result reveals that the weight is reduced by 49.8% while satisfying all the design constraints.

나(羅)·당(唐) 군의 이동과 백제군 배비 - 서기 660년 - (Movement of the Silla-the Tang army and Baekje military deployment)

  • 윤일영
    • 안보군사학연구
    • /
    • 통권13호
    • /
    • pp.137-658
    • /
    • 2016
  • 1. Movement of the leaders of the Silla army The leaders of the Silla army traveled from Gyeongju(경주) to Icheon (이천), Deokjeokdo(덕적도) Island, and Hwangsanwon(황산원) during the period of the Against Baekje(백제) War that began in 660. Movement route between Gyeongju and Icheon : Gyeongju(경주)-Daegu(대구)-Gumi(구미)-Gimcheon(김천)-Chupungryeong(추풍령)-Geumdol Fortress(금돌성)-Boeun(보은)-Jincheon(진천)-Juksan(죽산)-Bubal-eup(부발읍) Movement route between Bubal-eup and Deokjeokdo Island : Bubal-eup(부발읍)-Ipo(이포) Ferry-Haengju(행주) Ferry-Palmido (팔미도) Island-Seonjaedo(선재도) Island-Yeongheungdo(영흥도) Island-Pido(피도) Island-Soyado(소야도) Island-Deokjeokdo(덕적도) Island Movement route between Deokjeokdo Island and Hwangsan: Deokjeokdo(덕적도) Island-Danghangpo(당항포)-Jincheon(진천)-Boeun (보은)-Okcheon(옥천)-Geumsan(금산)-Tanhyeon(탄현)-Hwangsan (황산)-Ganggyeong(강경)-Buyeo(부여) 2. Movement of the combat units of the Silla army Jincheon area : 4,325 persons of the Geupdang unit(急幢) and 611 persons of the Kaegeumdang unit(罽衿幢) were deployed. These units moved from Jincheon to Cheongju, Yeongi, and Gongju, and contained Ungjin Fortress(熊津城) (6,650 Baekje troops). Boeun area : 4,763 persons of the Daedang(大唐) unit, 3,548 persons of the Hajujeong unit(下州停), 3,017 persons of the Namcheonjeong unit(南川停), and 4,500 persons of the Saseoldang unit(四設幢) were deployed. These units moved from Boeun(보은) to Okcheon(옥천), Geumsan(금산), Tanhyeon,(탄현) and Hwangsan(황산). Geumdol Fortress area : 3,753 persons of the Sangjujeong unit(上州停), 5,762 persons of the Seodang unit(誓幢), 3,753 persons of the Guidang unit(貴幢), and 5,562 persons of the Nangdang uni(郎幢)t were deployed. These units moved from Geumdol Fortress to Hwanggan(황간), Yeongdong(영동), Geumsan(금산), Tanhyeon(탄현), and Hwangsan(황산). Jirye area: 3,017 persons of the Eumrihwajeong unit(音里火停) and 3,017 persons of the Ehwahyejeong unit(伊火兮停) were deployed. These units moved from Jirye(지례) to Juchiryeong(走峙嶺), Mupung (무풍), Muju-eup(무주읍), and Bunam-myeon(부남면) in Muju-gun. Goryeong area: 3,017 persons of the Samryanghwajeong unit(三良火停) and 3,017 persons of the Sosamjeong unit(召參停) were deployed. These units moved from Goryeong(고령) to Geochang(거창), Hamyang(함양), Namwon(남원), Sunchang(순창), and Jeongeup(정읍). 3. Movement of the Tang army Dangjin area(당진 방면) : 1,000 persons were deployed. These units moved from Dangjin(당진) to Myeoncheon(면천), Yesan(예산), and Imjon Fortress(임존성). Garijeo area(가리저 방면) : 1,000 persons were deployed in the Garijeo(加里渚) area. These units moved from Garijeo(가리저) to Myeoncheon(면천), Yesan(예산), and Imjon Fortress(임존성). Geumganggu area(금강구 방면) : 000 persons were deployed. These units moved from Geumganggu(금강구) to Ganggyeong(강경) and Sabi Fortress(사비성). 4. Baekje military deployment Total troops of the Baekje army : There were 60 thousand Baekje troops according to the Old Book of Tang(舊唐書). Troop deployment by the Baekje army: 62,230 persons were deployed in 15 regions: 1,000 in Dangjin(당진), 1,000 in Garijeo(가리저), 6,120 in Imjon Fortress(임존성), 1,120 in Namjam Fortress(남잠성), 1,350 in Dooryangyun Fortress(두량윤성), 870 in Wangheungsajam Fortress(왕흥사잠성), 6,650 in Ungjin Fortress(웅진성), 1,120 in Jinhyeon Fortress(진현성), 1,000 in Dooshiwonak(두시원악), 1,000 in Irye Fortress(이례성), 5,000 in Gosaburi Fortress(고사부리성), 5,000 in Gujiha Fortress(구지하성), 3,000 plus 3,000 in Gibeolpo and Yangan(기벌포 양안), 5,000 in Deukan Fortress(득안성), and 20,000 in Sabi Fortress(사비성).

  • PDF