• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.327-336
• /
• 2007

Fixture의 안정도를 평가하는 장비인 Osstell Mentor와 기존 Osstell과의 비교 시험 및 측정환경에 따른 노이즈 발생 시험 결과를 통해 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. US II Fixture와 SS II Fixture의 ISQ 값을 측정한 1차 검증에서는 Osstell과 Osstell Mentor의 ISQ 값 경향의 차이가 크게 나타나지 않음을 확인하였다. 2. SS II Fixture를 얕게 매식한 것과 정상적인 매식한 것의 ISQ 값 비교를 한 2차 검증에서는, Osstell과 Osstell Mentor 모두 매식 깊이에 따른 동일한 경향의 결과를 보였다. 3. 3차 검증에서는 골질별로 Osstell과 Osstell Mentor의 ISQ 값이 일정한 경향을 보이는 것을 확인하였고, 특히 Osstell Mentor 장비는 Osstell 장비보다 사용함에 있어서 편리성이 뛰어나다고 판단된다. 또한 ISQ 값을 100% 신뢰하기는 어렵지만 Osstell Mentor를 임상 및 실험에 적용하는데 있어서는 문제가 없을 것으로 판단된다. 4. 측정환경에 따라 전자파를 발생시키는 환경이 존재하면 노이즈가 발생할 수 있으나, 실제 측정결과 휴대폰이 작동 중인 환경을 제외하고는 노이즈가 발생하지 않았다. 실제 치과 내에서의 사용에서도 노이즈는 발생하지 않음을 확인하였다. 5. 비교적 안전하게 장치를 장착 및 탈착 할 수 있어 측정과정에 의해 발생되는 임플란트와 주위골에 대한 잠재적 위험도가 낮고 측정위치에 따른 오차가 적어 임상적으로 불리한 상황과 다양한 환경에서의 임플란트 안정성 측정이 가능해 임상적 활용도가 높다고 판단된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권3호
• /
• pp.124-128
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. How the ISQ values measured by $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor are related, and whether the ISQ values acquired from the two machines changes in accordance with changes in implant stability are not yet fully understood. PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to find out correlation between the ISQ values acquired from $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor, and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and accuracy of two devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Sixty two implants were inserted into 47 patients, and their ISQ values were measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor. In the first stage surgery, the ISQ values of forty four implants inserted into thirty five patients were measured. In the second stage surgery, the values of fifty implants inserted into thirty seven patients were measured. The values were analyzed to determine the difference between the mean ISQ values of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor. In addition, the correlation between implants used in the first and second stage of surgery with regard to their types and areas of insertion were analyzed. The difference between the ISQ values of 32 implants in each patient during the first and second stage was analyzed. The statistical assessment was carried out using SPSS V. 12.0 for Win. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor in the first and second stages of surgery, whereas the difference between their ISQ values was evaluated using a paired t-test. RESULTS. In the first stage, the mean ISQ value for $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor was 70.84 and 75.09, respectively, showing a significant difference (P < .01). In the second stage, the mean ISQ value of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor was 71.76 and 75.94, respectively, also showing a significant difference (P < .01). The difference between the ISQ values in patients in the first and the second stages was significant with both instruments. CONCLUSION. The significant difference in the values obtained using the $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor between the first and second stages of implant surgery indicates that these values can be a convenient and precise way for evaluating the implant stability in clinical practice.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.205-211
• /
• 2001

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate successfully functioning implants stability in the partially edentulous mandibular molar sites by resonance frequency measurements. Resonance frequency measurement is more objective and clinically non-invasive method than any other methods had been used. In this study, $Osstell^{TM}$ (Integration Diagnostics, Sweden) was used. 15 patients ( 7 males, 8 females ) were received each 2 implants in their mandibular unilaterally partial edentulous molar sites. Total 30 implants were installed, 28 implants were $Br{\aa}nemark^{(R)}$ self-tapping fixtures(MK II, Nobel Biocare, Sweden) and 2 were $3i^{(R)}$(USA) self-tapping fixtures. Minimum of functional loading durations was 12 months and there were no significant marginal bone resorptions and peri-implant problems. From this test, the following results were drawn: 1. Mean ISQ values of implants in the first and second mandibular molar area were $73.66{\pm}4.45$, $71.93{\pm}3.41$, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups(p>0.05). Also mean ISQ value of total sum was 72.8. 2. Mean ISQ values of implants in males and females group were $71.64{\pm}4.06$, $73.81{\pm}3.76$, respectively. And there was no significant difference between two group(p>0.05). 3. Correlation between implant lengths and ISQ values was weak(r=0.128).

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.180-186
• /
• 2008

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of the implant recipient site preparation methods on primary stability of implants with the instruments of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ in the iliac bone of cadaver. Methods and materials: The 8 iliac bones in 4 cadavers and implants treated with resorbable blasting media (RBM) were used. $Periotest^{(R)}$ (Simens AG, Germany) and $Osstell^{TM}$ (Model 6 Resonance Frequency Analyser: Integration Diagnostics Ltd., Sweden) were used to measure primary stability of implants. Implants were inserted into the iliac crest of the cadaver. In control group, the recipient site was prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendation: 1.8 mm guide drill, 2.0 mm initial drill, 2.7 mm pilot drill, 2.7 mm twist drill, 3.0 mm twist drill, 3.3 mm pilot drill, 3.3 mm twist drill, and 3.3 mm countersink drill as well as tapping drill were used in order. In the group 1, implant recipient sites were prepared by sequentially drilling from 1.8 mm guide drill to 3.0 mm twist drill and then inserted implants without countersinking and tapping. In the group 2, implant recipient sites were prepared to 3.0 mm twist drill and countersink drill and then inserted implants without tapping. In the group 3, the sites were prepared to 3.0 mm twist drill and countersink drill as well as tapping drill. In the group 4, the sites were prepared to 3.3 mm twist drill. In the group 5, the sites were prepared to 3.3 mm twist drill and countersink drill. A total of 60 implants were placed (n=10). The stability was measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ mesiodistally and buccolingually. To compare the mean stability of each group statistically, One-way ANOVA was used and correlation of instrument were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. The results obtained were as follows; 1. The stability of group 1 measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ buccolingually showed the highest, and there are significant difference statistically between control group and experimental group 1,2,4 in each instruments respectively (p<0.05). 2. The stability of group 1 measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ mesiodistally showed the highest. There are significant difference statistically between control group and all experimental groups in $Osstell^{TM}$, and between control group and experimental group 1,2,3,4 (p<0.05). 3. There are high correlation between the measurements of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicate that the primary stability of implant can be obtained by the recipient sites preparation with smaller diameter drill than that of implant or minimal drilling.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.42-52
• /
• 2008

임플랜트가 개발된 이후 임플랜트 안정성을 아기 위한 여러 방법들이 연구되어 왔고 여러 측정 장치들이 고안되어 왔다. 그 중에서도 공명주파수분석법(Resonance Frequency Analysis)을 이용한 방법이 요즘 각광을 받고 있다. 가장 최근에 공명주파수분석법을 이용한 측정 장치의 하나인 $Osstell^{TM}$ 보다 간편한 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor의 출시로 임상적으로 더 편하게 임플랜트의 안정성을 측정 할 수 있게 되었다. 본 연구는 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor 의 자기공명막대인 $Smartpeg^{TM}$을 사용할 때 임상에서 측정 가능한 측정횟수가 얼마나 되는지를 확인하고 또한 소독 후에도 측정값이 안정한지를 확인하고자 실험을 하였다. 실험 목적은 5가지로 나누어 알아보고자 하였다: 1. 자기공명막대의 반복측정의 영향: 자기 공명막대와 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor를 고정시키고 반복적인 측정을 하여 몇 회까지 측정값이 안정한가? 2. 자기공명막대의 탈부착 반복의 영향: 자기공명막대를 탁부착을 반복하면서 몇회까지 측정값이 안정한가? 3. 자기공명막대의 소독방법에 따른 영향: 진료실내의 소독방법 후에도 자기 공명막대 측정값이 안정한가? 4. 자기 공명막대의 반복되는 고압증기멸균 소독 후의 영향: 고압증기 멸균법 10회 반복적인 소독 후에도 측정값이 안정한가? 5. 자기 공명막대의 자성소실온도 확인: 자기공명막대의 자성을 잃는 온도는 몇 도인가? 실험방법은 각 실험별 8개의 자기공명막대를 준비하고 각각의 구별을 위해 컬러펜으로 표식을 했으며 실험전 측정값을 재고, 실험후 측정값을 재어 비교하였다. 자기공명막대 반복측정의 영향을 알아본 실험은 최초의 측정값과 변화가 있는 횟수를 알아보려 했으며 측정값에 변화가 없을 경우 400회까지 측정하여, 1-100회, 101-200회, 201-300회, 301-400회 4군으로 나누어 유의수준을 살펴보았다. 자기공명막대 탈부착 반복의 영향을 알아본 실험은 자기 공명막대 8개를 각각 400회씩 탈부착하여 측정값의 변화를 1-100회, 101-200회, 201-300회, 301-400회 4군으로 나누어 군간 유의수준을 확인하였다. 자기공명막대 소독방법에 따른 영향에 대한 실험은 8개의 자기공명막대를 소독 전 측정값과 소독 후 측정값을 비교확인하였다. 자기 공명막대 반복되는 고압증기멸균 소독 후의 영향에 대한 실험은 8개의 자기공명막대를 10회 반복 소독하면서 소독 전 측정값을 0군, 1-10회까지 소독 후를 10군으로 나누어 군간 유의수준을 확인하였다. 자기공명막대 자성 소실 온도 확인실험은 8개의 자기 공명막대를 $138^{\circ}C$/10분, $150^{\circ}C$/5분, $150^{\circ}C$/10분으로 나누어 자기공명막대가 자성을 잃는 온도가 몇 도인지 실험하였다. 실험결과; 1. 자기공명막대 반복측정의 영향 실험에서는 각 군간 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 2. 자기공명막대 탈부착측정의 영향에 대한 실험은 각 군간 유의 확률이 0.123으로 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 3. 자기공명막대 소독방법에 따른 영향에 대한 실험은 소독 전 측정값과 소독 후 측정값의 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 4. 자기공명막대 반복되는 고압증기멸균소독 후의 영향에 대한 실험은 각 군간 유의성이 없었다.(p>0.05). 5. 자기공명막대 자성 소실온도확인 실험은 $138^{\circ}C$/10분에서는 소독 전, 후간 측정값에 유의성이 없었고(p>0.05), $150^{\circ}C$/5분에서는 2개가 측정 불가였으며, $150^{\circ}C$/10분에서는 8개 모두 ISQ값을 측정할 수가 없었다. 결론으로 말하면, 자기 공명막대가 나사산이 손상되지 않고 자성을 잃지 않으면 측정값이 변하지 않을 것으로 사료된다. 그리고 자기공명막대를 $150^{\circ}C$/10분에서 진공건열멸균 소독 후에 자성을 잃는 것으로 나타난 결과로 추론해 보건데, 진료실에서 가장 높은 온도를 보이는 고압증기멸균 소독이 $132^{\circ}C$/15분 이므로 진료실내의 소독방법들에는 아무런 문제가 없는 것으로 사료된다. 몇 번 사용할 수 있는지의 문제는 400번 측정 시 수치에 변화가 없으므로 측정되지 않을 때까지 사용해도 무방하리라 사료된다.

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2004년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.53-53
• /
• 2004

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.126-135
• /
• 2023

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t-test. RESULTS. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). Periotest showed different results in all six parts in the supine position and in five parts in the upright position compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). While Anycheck showed different results in five areas in the supine position compared to outside of the mouth, it showed different results in only one area in the upright position (P < .05). CONCLUSION. In the difficult implant position for the operator to access, the implant stability measuring devices show less reliability. The accessibility of implant is greatly affected in the order of Osstell, Anycheck, and Periotest.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.301-308
• /
• 2007

Purpose: This study was performed to compare and evaluate the effect of recipient site depths and diameters of the drills on the primary stability of implant in pig's ribs. Materials and methods: An intact pig's rib larger than 8 mm in width and 20 mm in height; RBM(resorbable blasting media) surface blasted ${\phi}3.75mm$ and 8.0 mm long USII Osstem Implants (Osstem Co., Korea) were used. To measure the primary stability, $Periotest^{(R)}$ (Simens AG, Germany) and $Osstell^{TM}$ (Model 6 Resonance Frequency Analyser: Integration Diagnostics Ltd., Sweden) were used. They were divided into 6 groups according to its recipient site formation method: D3H3, D3H5, D3H7, D3.3H3, D3.3H5, D3.3H7. Each group had, as indicated, 10 implants placed, and total 60 implants were used. The mean value was obtained by 4-time measurements each on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side perpendicular to the long axis of the implant using $Periotest^{(R)}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$. For statistical analysis one-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean value of each group, and the correlation between placement depths and the primary stability, and that of measuring instruments was analyzed using SPSS 12.0. Results: The primary stability of the implants increased as the placement depths increased (p<0.05), and showed a proportional relationship (p<0.01). The primary stability increased when the diameter of the recipient site was smaller than that of the implant but with no statistical significance. There was a strong correlation between $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ (p<0.01). Conclusion: These results suggest that increasing the placement depth of implants enhances the primary stability of implant.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.337-358
• /
• 2007

Purpose This study was performed to evaluate the stability of dual thread implant using resonance frequency analysis in human. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients(32 males and 23 females) with a mean age of 50 years and 1 month who were treated during March, 2005 to July, 2007 in Pusan National University hospital. Totally 145 dual thread Implants were installed and initial stability was measured by Osstell $Mentor^{TM}$. After 3-6 Months, secondary stability was measured at the time of second surgery or before prosthetic treatment. Results At the time of 1st surgery, average ISQ value was $75.12{\pm}12.06$. Only 1 implant was failed during the healing period. Before prosthetic treatment, ISQ values were measured and its mean value was $80.94{\pm}6.12$. Conclusion These results suggest that the increased stability of the implant verifies the clinical relevance of double thread implant.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제50권3호
• /
• pp.176-183
• /
• 2012

연구 목적: 부분 무치악 환자에서 Mg titanate implant (M Implant system, Shinhung, Korea)의보철 후 1년간의 방사선사진을 이용한 변연골 흡수량과 Osstell$^{(R)}$을 이용한 임플란트 안정성 평가 결과를 분석하여 임상적인 성공률에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 38명의 환자에 79개의 임플란트를 식립하여 보철 후 1년 동안 변연골 흡수량, 임플란트의 동요도, 임플란트 식립 위치에 따른 분포 및 성공률, 보철 전후에 따른 성공률을 분석했다. 결과: 변연골의 흡수량은 보철물 장착 후 1년간의 평가에서 상악에서는 평균 1.537 mm, 하악에서는 평균 1.172 mm의 변연골 흡수가 관찰되었으며, 전체적인 상하악의 평균 변연골 흡수량은 1.255 mm로 관찰되었다. 수술 후 시간이 경과함에 따라 ISQ값은 미약하게 감소하였다가 증가하는 경향을 보였으나, 상악과 하악 모두에서 식립 당일 이후 예비 인상일, 최종 보철물의 장착일과 주기적인 평가 기간 동안 ISQ값의 큰 증가나 감소를 나타내지는 않았다. 성공률은 상악에서의 94.12%였고, 하악에서의 98.39%였다. 결론: 본 실험의 결과로 미루어 Mg titanate implant는 임상적으로 양호한 결과를 보여주었다.