• Title/Summary/Keyword: Obwegeser II method

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

SURGICAL CORRECTION OF SEVERE MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM BY OBWEGESER II AND RIGID INTERNAL FLXATION (심한 하악골 전돌증 환자의 외과적 치험례)

  • Lee, Geon-Ho;Kwon, Dae-Geon;Jang, Do-Geon;Lee, Sang-Han
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • v.16 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-42
    • /
    • 1994
  • Obwegeser II method and Rigid fixation conserving the condylar position has been performed on 5 patients with severe mandibular prognathism, and we obtained the result after the follow up study follows. 1. Obwegeser II method is considered to move the distal segment passively when surgical correction of severe open bite correction and large amount of set back above 15mm is needed. 2. In one case that has more change of condylar position after operation, documented immediate post-operative relapse have been occurred 3. In the others that have adequate control of condylar position, passive set back and firm skeletal fixation, more functional and esthetic improvement and more post-operative stability has been achieved

  • PDF

STABILITY OF OBWEGESER II METHOD IN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHIC OR ANTERIOR OPEN BITE PATIENTS (하악전돌증 및 개교합 환자에 있어 Obwegeser Ⅱ method의 안정성)

  • Jung, Chang-Wook;Nam, Jeong-Hun;Lee, Sang-Han;Kwon, Tae-Geon
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-33
    • /
    • 2004
  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative stability of the severe open bite or mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular set back surgery by Obwegeser II method. There were 19 patients who had been undergone Obwegeser II method. The horizontal and vertical position of the cephalometric points were measured preoperation and immediate postoperation, postoperative 1 month, postoperative 6 months ; were analyzed by linear measurement to evaluate changes in skeletal landmark and the relapse was compared between open bite group and prognathism group. By the operation, horizontal change of B was $6.84{\pm}4.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $6.28{\pm}3.25mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $14.20{\pm}4.81mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.99{\pm}2.66mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $3.82{\pm}5.71mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $5.38{\pm}2.11mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $13.24{\pm}5.99mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.91{\pm}0.94mm$ in prognathism group. Between immediate postoperation and postoperative 1 month, all skeletal landmarks change was no statistical difference (p>0.05) and there were no statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group except x-Me landmark (p>0.05). Between postoperative 1 month and 6 months, horizontal change of B was $0.12{\pm}1.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.47{\pm}1.48mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $1.43{\pm}1.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $0.82{\pm}1.99mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $0.13{\pm}1.40mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $0.88{\pm}1.71mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $1.08{\pm}1.74mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $0.47{\pm}1.57mm$ in prognathism group (p>0.05) and there were no statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group (p>0.05). Between immediate postoperation and postoperative 6months, horizontal change of B was $0.24{\pm}1.17mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.87{\pm}1.63mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $1.54{\pm}1.55mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.04{\pm}1.96mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $0.91{\pm}1.46mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.18{\pm}2.05mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $0.96{\pm}1.62mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.23{\pm}2.35mm$ in prognathism group (p>0.05) and there were statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group in x-B, x-Pog, x-Gn, x-Me (p<0.05). Obwegeser II method is considered as one of the best operation when surgical correction of severe open bite or severe mandibular prognathism is needed.

CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF GONIAL ANGLE CHANGE AFTER ORTHOGNATHIC SUGERY IN PATIENTS WITH THE MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM (하악전돌증환자의 악교정수술후 하악각변화에 관한 임상적 분석)

  • Kwon, Yeong-Ho;Jang, Hyun-Jung;Lee, Sang-Han
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.206-216
    • /
    • 2000
  • Predictional study for lateral change between pre- and post-orthognathic surgery has been emphasized mainly on anterior area of lateral profile; upper lip, lower lip and chin et al. So interest for lateral profile change has been less in posterior area of lateral profile and literature analyzing gonial angle change is rare. The purpose of this study is to make prediction for gonial angle change possible and to offer somewhat treatment guidance for gonial angle to be improved by investigating overall gonial angle change between pre- and post-orthognathic surgery and inquiring into factors influencing on pattern of genial angle change. For this study 35 patients were selected retrospectively. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken in just pre-op time, pod 1 day, pod 1 year. They were analyzed and genial angles were measured. The results were as follows : 1. Gonial angle at pod 1 day was decreased about $9.3^{\circ}$ than pre-op and gonial angle at pod 1 year was increased about $4.0^{\circ}$ than pod 1 day. So genial angle at pod 1 year was decreased about $5.3^{\circ}$ than pre-op genial angle(p<0.01). 2. Mean pre-op gonial angle was $129.4^{\circ}$, showing significantly high value than normal and mean gonial angle at pod 1 year was $124.1^{\circ}$, showing value near to normal. 3. Mean gonial angle change between pre-op and pod 1 year was decreased about $5.4^{\circ}$ in female and $5.3^{\circ}$ in male. There was no statistically significant difference between male and female(p>0.05). 4. Principal factor influencing on decreased gonial angle in gonial angle change between pre-op and pod 1 year was amount of mandibular setback. 5. Principal factor influencing on increased gonial angle in gonial angle change between pod 1 day and pod 1 year was % horizontal relapse, and it was thought that resorption and bone remodelling on posterior area in mandibular distal segment also were related to increased gonial angle. 6. It is thought that sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathic patients with high value of gonial angle is effective to improvement of gonial angle, and In patients who have normal range of gonial angle and are required with excessive mandibular setback, short lingual cut method, additional resection of posterior margin of distal segment, Obwegeser II method will be considerd. 7. More prudent operation and careful post-op management will be responsible for maintenance of postoperative stable gonial angle.

  • PDF