• Title/Summary/Keyword: Nomenclatural change

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Splitting blades: why genera need to be more carefully defined; the case for Pyropia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta)

  • Zuccarello, Giuseppe C.;Wen, Xinging;Kim, Gwang Hoon
    • ALGAE
    • /
    • v.37 no.3
    • /
    • pp.205-211
    • /
    • 2022
  • The trend in naming genera based almost exclusively on molecular data, and not on morphological diagnostic characters, is increasing. In bifurcating phylogenetic trees generic cut-offs are arbitrary, but at the bare minimum nomenclatural changes should be supported by multiple phylogenetic methodologies using appropriate models for all the various gene partitions, strong support with all branch support methods, and should also result in adding to our knowledge of the interrelationships of taxa. We believe that a recent taxonomic treatment of the genus Pyropia (Yang et al. 2020) into several genera is unwarranted. We reanalysed the data presented in the recent article, using additional phylogenetic methods. Our results show that many of the newly established genera are not well supported by all methods, and the new circumscription of the genus Pyropia renders it unsupported. We also tested additional outgroups, which were previously suggested as sister to Pyropia, but this did not substantially change our conclusions. These generic nomenclatural changes of the previously strongly supported genus Pyropia, do not shed light on the evolution of this group and have serious consequences in these commercially important algae, that are also governed by a plethora of regulation and by-laws that now need to be amended. We suggest that the over-splitting of groups based only on poorly produced and modestly supported phylogenies should not be accepted and that the genus Pyropia sensu Sutherland et al. (2011) be restored.

Synonymy of Micropolyspora internatus and Saccharomonospora viridis and Emended Description of Saccharomonospora viridis

  • Shin, Su-Kyoung;Cho, Yong-Joon;Yi, Hana
    • Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
    • /
    • v.27 no.1
    • /
    • pp.149-154
    • /
    • 2017
  • Transfer of Micropolyspora internatus into the genus Saccharomonospora as "Saccharomonospora internatus comb. nov." was proposed by Kurup and Greiner-Mai, but the nomenclatural change has not been validly published. Although the inclusion of M. internatus in the genus Saccharomonospora has not being established, the synonymy of "Saccharomonospora internatus" and S. viridis was proposed by Greiner-Mai. A number of recent publications regarded M. internatus as a synonym of S. viridis, but the name M. internatus is still used in some cases instead of S. viridis. This is because of the complicated history of M. internatus and S. viridis, but it is different from the generally accepted view of prokaryotic taxonomy. To clearly verify the synonymy of M. internatus and S. viridis, a literature review and experimental verification were conducted in this study. Based on the genomic and phenotypic characteristics obtained in this study, the synonymy of the two species was obvious. The emended description of S. viridis is given.

Introductions of the New Code of Fungal Nomenclature and Recent Trends in Transition into One Fungus/One Name System (균류의 새로운 명명 규약과 일균일명 체계로의 전환)

  • Hong, Seung-Beom;Kwon, Soon-Wo;Kim, Wan-Gyu
    • The Korean Journal of Mycology
    • /
    • v.40 no.2
    • /
    • pp.73-77
    • /
    • 2012
  • Nomenclatural code for fungi was dramatically modified in the 18th International Botanical Congress (IBC) held in Melbourne, Australia in July 2011. Its name was changed into International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants (ICN), which was formerly called as International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) of the Vienna Code of 2005. The most important change for fungi is abandoning dual nomenclature and introducing one fungus/one name system (2013. 1). Since more than 10,000 species of fungal names should be renamed based on this new classification system (one fungus/one name system), it is challenging to both mycologists and taxonomic users such as plant pathologists and food scientists. Here, we introduced background, progress and future plan for its transition into one fungus/one name system. The new code is allowing electronic-only publication of names of new taxa (2102. 1) and the requirement for a Latin validating diagnosis was changed to allow either English or Latin for the publication of a new name (2011. 1). Furthermore, pre-publication deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository is mandatory in ICN (2013. 1). The aims of this manuscript are to introduce new code of fungal nomenclature and recent trends in one fungus/one name system to Korean mycological society.