• Strategy21
• /
• 통권31호
• /
• pp.190-219
• /
• 2013

Since Korea and Japan established diplomatic relationship, Relationship between Korea and Japan has not been easygoing. There are two most explosive, and noticeable ones among topics which have affected the relationship ; Dokdo and Historical Distortion. Without these issues, relationship between two countries will take a turn for the better. However, unfortunately, it seems that it is almost never going to happen. There is the Japanese conservative right-wing who has an influence on those two issues. The right-wing takes regard getting negative view or finding out dark past as an action from Self-torture view of history, and tries to dilute the Japanese sense of guilt on past invasions to neighbor countries. Moreover, to become a "normal country", they are trying to revise Constitution of the Japan so that Japan can possess the military and re-arm, dispatch troops abroad, and get the right to break the war. In other words, they expect Japan to become a powerful nation with great influence on Asia and world, as the period in which Japan conquered Korean peninsula, China, and South-Eastern nations. Japan still harbours secret romanticism for bygone days of imperialist glory. That is why neighbors want to never make the painful history happen again. In order to deal with this effort, most of all, it is required to assert better argument with a careful, thorough analysis on Japanese opinion about Dokdo. There might be a hidden card which can be accepted in the international society considering Japanese persistent effort to make Dokdo disputed area, and that is why we have to know that it is. In addition, it is needed to secure a high-quality professional manpower because the issues of Dokdo and Historical Distortion are primarily the matter of logic and references. The professional manpower should have open-minded to break down walls of their own majors. We have to introduce our achievements and stances to the international society vigorously. As a definite way to solve these problems, we have to develop national power. We have to possess naval forces and coast guard to protect our territory and Koreans overseas. There are not many options Korea can do to Japan, except protesting denunciation, and pressing a joint efforts. Most of the suggestions stated before are what have to be conducted domestically. It is a miserable condition, because two problems are Japanese domestic issues, but they become international issues and we have to seek a solution for ourselves.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제13호
• /
• pp.97-132
• /
• 2012

1799 Francisco de Goya published Los Caprichos with 80 aquatint etchings. On 6 February he advertised it on the front page of the Diario de Madrid. The long advertisement which began with "a collection of prints of capricious subjects, invented and etched by Don Francisco Goya" informed purpose, themes and methods of this collection of prints. According to this advertisement Goya "has chosen as subjects for his work, from the multitude of follies and mistakes common in every civil society and from the vulgar prejudices and lies authorized by custom, ignorance or self-interest, those that he has thought most fit to provide material for ridicules, and at the same time to exercise the artist's imagination." The text emphasized that the 'author' of this series didn't to want to criticise any individual and to be a copyist. From his phantasy Goya invented many creatures like the anthropic, humanized animals etc.. With Los Caprichos he stood on the threshold to Romanticism. The early researchers of Los Caprichos classified its author, Goya as an enlightened intellectual. The similarity of the themes of the series with the subjects of the Enlightenment, his some enlightened 'friends' and the idea to avoid the prevalent mystification of his life supported this theory. But this trend became revised since the 80's of the last century. This made possible to research Goya's works in new perspective and to see that Goya didn't criticise the Spanish society and his contemporaries. Rather he showed its reality and parodied through creatures which are mixtures of the reality that he observed, and visions that he invented. Characters and scenes in Goya's prints are ambiguous and equivocal. They have the values which are defined by the dualistic metaphysic in Europe as oppositional, like good and evil for example, at the same time. Goya himself also appeared in various types in this series. This ambiguousness, or "polyphony", as Jennis Tomlinson defined, is a symptom of the decay of the belief in the Enlightenment which spreaded in Europe as a result of the attack of Bastille and the French Revolution. Goya's self-portrait in pl. 43 of this series, "El sue$\tilde{n}$o de la razon produce monstruos" shows the complex psychology of him and his contemporaries as well. As the rest etchings after this print show witchcraft and monsters reside in the world in which the reason of the Enlightenment and the through the reason weakened God's rule lost their authority. In this thesis I will examine and analyse how Goya represented in Los Caprichos the nature of man and its society, as complex being in which the 'antagonistic' value couple as good and evil couldn't be divided, but are united.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.58-68
• /
• 2014

크리스티안 케이 로렌츠 히르시펠트(Christian Cay Lorenz Hirschfeld)(1742-1792)는 18세기 독일의 미학자이자 정원이론가로 당대에 '풍경식 정원예술의 아버지'라고 불리었다. 그는 '정원예술론'이란 5권의 저작에서 정원이론을 집대성하였고 이는 현재까지도 가장 포괄적인 정원이론서로 여겨진다. 정원역사에서 식물소재, 공간구성요소와 정원유형 등을 다루고 있는 이 이론서는 당대에 유럽에 널리 알려졌고, 이로 인해 영국 풍경식정원을 널리 보급시키는데 크게 이바지하게 된다. 그러나 히르시펠트의 정원론에 관한 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 이 논문은 히르시펠트 정원론의 주요 내용을 살펴보고 현대적 관점에서의 주요 쟁점을 해석하는데 그 목적이 있다. 히르시펠트 정원이론은 18세기 독일 계몽주의와 낭만주의가 교차하는 지점에 태동되었고, 자연이 지닌 정신적 가치를 중시하는 독일문화의 산물이기도 했다. 당대 독서문화가 활성화되고 기행문학이 유행하게 된 사회 현상이 정원이론서가 소비될 수 있었던 배경이 되기도 했다. 오늘날 관점에서 히르시펠트 정원론이 기여한 바와 이를 재해석할 수 있는 쟁점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정원예술의 위상을 높이는데 크게 기여했다는 점이다. 둘째, 히르시펠트는 정원예술은 자연의 모방이라는 전제 아래 자연의 원형 경관과 고안된 정원과의 관계를 규명하였으며, 정원은 자연의 아름다움을 최대한 표현하고 끌어낼 때 진정한 예술적 가치를 지닐 수 있다고 주창하였다. 셋째, 히르시펠트는 특정 정원의 인상과 관념이 연합하여 화학적 작용을 일으킨다는 점을 강조하였다. 특정 감정을 불러일으키는 공간을 그는 유쾌하고 쾌활한 축제와 같은 정원, 온화하고 멜랑코리한 정원, 낭만적인 정원, 장엄한 정원 등으로 구분하였다. 넷째, 그는 정원에서의 움직임이 감정을 불러일으키는 중요한 국면임을 강조하였다. 움직임이 중시되는 풍경식정원에서 풍경화식 재현방식이 적절한 방식으로 활용되었다. 다섯째로는 정원은 단지 물리적 공간이 아닌 정신이 구현된 장소임을 환기시켰고, 나아가 삶의 은유로서 윤리적 정원을 실천해야 한다고 주창하였다. 히르시펠트의 정원론은 18세기에 저술된 이론적 저작으로 현재적 시점에서의 구체적인 실천적 함의가 부족하다는 비판적 시각이 있다. 하지만 그는 공공 정원에 대한 논의를 통하여 19세기 도시공원운동의 단초를 제공하였다. 정원예술의 위상제고, 지역성의 강조, 실천이념으로 중재 개념이 그의 이론에서 우리가 주목해야 할 지점이다. 무엇보다도 정원문화가 새롭게 부각되는 오늘날 인문학적 조경론의 가능성을 제시했다는 점에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다.