• 제목/요약/키워드: National policy

검색결과 11,824건 처리시간 0.037초

지방철도정책의 전개와 이념 -일본국철의 경험을 중심으로- (Development and Philosophy in Local Railway Policy: The Experience of Japanese National Railway)

  • 황영진
    • 한국철도학회논문집
    • /
    • 제17권1호
    • /
    • pp.70-78
    • /
    • 2014
  • 최근, 한국철도는 지방철도의 적자노선 분리와 민간사업자에 대한 철도개방이 검토되는 등 철도수송에 경쟁을 도입하는 정책을 강구하고 있다. 특히, 이러한 정책추진 과정에서 지역의 공공교통을 담당하는 지방철도의 적자노선 분리는 교통약자의 기본적인 이동의 권리를 박탈할 뿐만 아니라 지역 공공교통의 전면적인 쇠퇴를 초래하는 등 많은 문제점을 갖고 있다. 본 논문은 지방 적자선의 운영경험이 풍부한 일본사례를 중심으로 국철지방철도정책이 어떠한 정책이념과 과정에 의해 전개되어 왔는지를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 일본국철의 지방철도정책은 수익성을 중심으로 한 노선분리의 정책이였으며, 아울러 존폐책임과 재원조치는 철도사업자와 지자체에 전가하는 정책이었음을 규명하였다.

영국 잉글랜드 RDA에 대한 포괄적 예산지원과 지역발전정책의 분권화 ('Single Pot' Programme for the RDAs of England and the Devolution in Regional Development Policy)

  • 변필성;김광익
    • 한국경제지리학회지
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.164-173
    • /
    • 2008
  • 1997년 노동당 정권 출범 이후, 영국 중앙정부는 지역발전정책의 분권화(예 : RDA의 설립, 지역의회 창설 등)를 대대적으로 추진하였다. 이러한 배경 하에서, 본고는 영국 Region 수준에서의 지역발전정책 분권화의 중요한 제도적 기반을 살펴보았다. 즉 2002년부터 시행되어 온 영국 중앙정부의 잉글랜드 9개 지역 RDA에 대한 포괄적 예산지원, 그리고 그에 대응해서 각 지역 RDA가 중앙정부와 합의 하에 설정한 지역발전 목표의 추구와 중앙정부의 실적 모니터링을 고찰하였다. 그리고 분권화된 지역발전정책의 필요성이 높아지고 있는 우리나라의 상황에 영국에서의 분권화가 제시할 수 있는 시사점 및 향후 과제를 간략히 논의하였다.

  • PDF

노인장기요양보험 시설서비스에 대한 가족수발자 만족도 영향 요인 (Factors related to Family Caregiver Satisfaction with the Institutional care services under the Public Long-Term Care Insurance system)

  • 권진희;한은정;이정석
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제19권4호
    • /
    • pp.78-97
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study examined the factors related to family caregiver satisfaction with institutional care services for beneficiaries under the Public Long-Term Care Insurance(PLTCI) system. Determining what contributes to family caregiver satisfaction is a critical step toward implementing effective quality improvement strategies. A national cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted from November to December 2008, using proportionate quota sampling based on the location and level of Long-Term Care of the beneficiaries. Total 1,745 family caregivers wrote informed consents and 733 (response rate 42%) completed questionnaires, which included caregiver characteristics, organizational resources, primary objective and subjective stressors, perceived quality of services, and family caregiver satisfaction. Family caregivers were satisfied overall with institutional care. In multiple regression analysis, there was a statistically significant difference in degree of family caregiver satisfaction according to caregiver characteristics(relationship to beneficiary), primary objective stressors (insurance type of beneficiary), perceived quality of services(respect to family caregivers' idea, ADL support, expertness of staff, careful concern of staff, fulfillment of client's requests, and safety of institution's environment). In public long-term care, satisfaction efforts are in an early stage of development. This study is meaningful as the first attempt to measure family caregiver satisfaction with institutional care for beneficiaries under the PLTCI system, and to identify factors affecting the satisfaction. Among the identified factors, the policy makers, the insurer, and the providers need to pay attention to perceived quality of services, in particular, to improve customer satisfaction. Our findings can provide quality care improvement initiatives in the public long-term care setting.

노인장기요양보험 시설서비스 본인부담금에 대한 가족수발자의 경제적 부담감 영향요인 (Factors Related to Family Caregiver Financial Burden of Out-Of Pocket Expenses for the Nursing home service under Long-term Care Insurance System)

  • 한은정;이정석;권진희
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제22권3호
    • /
    • pp.383-402
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting family caregiver financial burden of out-of pocket expenses for the nursing home service under Long-term Care Insurance System. We conducted a national cross-sectional descriptive survey from July to September 2010 to collect data based on the long-term care benefits cost specification. Total 1,016 family caregivers completed questionnaires. 185 subjects of total were excluded from the data analysis due to being answered by user(18 cases), or caregivers not to pay for services expenditures(122 cases), having a missing data on family caregivers characteristics(45 cases). Finally, 831 subjects were included in the study. The average financial burden was 3.18(${\pm}0.71$). We divided subjects into two groups by level of burden, high-burden group and low-burden group. In the result of the multiple logistic regression analysis, family caregiver financial burden was significantly higher in family caregivers with ages 40 to 49 compared to less than 40, lower educational level, unsatisfaction for long-term care service, high percentage(more than 50%) of cost-sharing and high total out-of pocket expenses(more than 300,000 won) for long-term care services. Also, Family caregivers who are spouse felt higher financial burden compared to son. This study is meaningful as the first attempt to measure family caregiver financial burden for long-term care service and to identify factors affecting the financial burden. Family caregivers felt financial burden of out-of pocket expenses for the nursing home service. The policy makers, the insurer, and the providers need to pay attention to ease family caregiver financial burden.

S&T Collaboration in Developing Countries: Lessons from Brazilian Collaboration Activities with South Korea

  • Fink, Daniel;Hameed, Tahir;So, Minho;Kwon, Youngsun;Rho, Jae Jeung
    • STI Policy Review
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.92-110
    • /
    • 2012
  • An active policy role is suggested for collaboration that will enhance national level Science and Technology (S&T) capabilities. In contrast, some studies see a limited role of policy support for collaborative S&T research at the individual level (including research groups or institutional levels) due to their self-organizing nature. Two views on S&T collaboration look at different levels but existing research largely ignores the context of developing countries. This paper shows how S&T collaborations between Brazil and Korea have developed over the past two decades. The paper indicates the gaps between initiation and the actual establishment of collaborative research at national and individual levels, differences in the focus areas of research, differences in resources and project planning, and the nature of collaborations. Collaborative research activities at the national level were initiated before the individual level but activated later than the individual level; in addition, the focus areas of research were laid down earlier at the national level with individual collaborations focused on different areas. Project types remained different at each level (i.e. top-down and bottom-up) or with a slightly changing mix. This study suggests appropriate policy measures (such as the timely and effective information collection of activities at different levels and proactive coordination) that could reduce the gaps in the timing and alignment of research areas. This paper also alludes to an evolutionary model to develop S&T collaboration among developing countries.

한국보건행정학회 30주년 기념 특별호 (Special Issue for the 30th Anniversary of the Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management)

  • 박은철
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제28권3호
    • /
    • pp.195-196
    • /
    • 2018
  • The Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (KAHPM) has shown remarkable achievements in the field of health policy and management in Korea for the last 30 years. The KAHPM consists of experts in various fields of health policy and management, and has been the leading academic discussion forum for health policy agendas of interest to the public. Health Policy and Management (HPM), the official journal of the KAHPM, published the first issue of volume 1 in October, 1991 and is publishing the second issue of volume 28 as of 2018. Currently, it is one of Korea' main journals in the field of health policy and management. HPM has published a special issue in commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the KAHPM. The HPM invited authors, including former presidents of the KAHPM and current board members, to write about main issues in health policy and management. Although the HPM tried to set up an invited author on all subjects in the health policy and management field, 19 papers are published, that completed the peer review process by August, 2018. The authors of the special issue of the 30th anniversary of the KAHPM include six former presidents, a senior professor, and 12 board members. The subjects of this issue are reform of the healthcare delivery system, health insurance and medical policy, reform of health system governance, the role of National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA) and the National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), ethical aspects of health policy change, regional disparities of healthcare, healthcare accreditation, new healthcare technology evaluation system, globalization of the healthcare industry, the epidemiological investigator system, the quarantine system, safety and disaster, and official development assistance. There are some remaining topics to deal with for the KAHPM: aged society, anti-smoking, non-infectious disease, suicide, healthcare resources, emergency medical care, out-of-pocket money, medical fee payment system, medical aid system, long-term care insurance, industrial accident compensation insurance, community-centered health welfare system, and central government and local government of health. The HPM will continue to publish review articles on the main topics in health policy and management. This is because the KAHPM, which has been the leading academic society of Korea's health policy and management for the last 30 years, feels responsible for continuing its mission for the next 30 years.