• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1999년도 제16회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.216-239
• /
• 1999

Korean government has planned a large scale multidepartment-participated national R&D program to advance and improve her science and technology and the quality of life In the level of advanced(especially G-7) countries in the forthcoming 21st century. It is called as "Highly Advanced National projects" or "G7 projects", which was initiated in 1991 with 18 sub-programs to date. It has planned to be continued until 2001 with its total fund of 4, 591 billion Won, comprised of 2, 033 billion Won from the public sector and 2, 558 billion Won from the private sector. Evaluation activities, the country has carried out to date, for national R&D programs including HAN projects are focused mainly on the assessment of scientific and technological results to decide that a specific program should be continued, terminated, or modified. Thus, it is necessary for national R&D programs to be evaluated socioeconomically for the purpose of assessing the nationwide economic and social impact from the program. Socioeconomic evaluation would be told how and where the program contributed to the society, and what the socioeconomic impacts are resulted from the program. It would be useful for the means of (ⅰ) fulfillment of public accountability to legitimate the program and to reveal the expenditure of pubic fund, and (ⅱ) managemental and strategical learning to give information necessary to improve the making. program and policy decision making, The objectives of the study are to develop the methodology of modeling the socioeconomic evaluation, and build up the practical socioeconomic evaluation model of the HAN projects including scientific and technological effects. Since the HAN projects consists of 18 subprograms, it is difficult In evaluate all the subprograms simultaneously. Despite, each program is being performed under the category of HAN projects, so the common socioeconomic issues are existing, The followings are main results of the study. First, the hierarchical structure of the socioeconomic evaluation are constructed; Evaluation Perspective, Evaluation Bounds, and Evaluation Aspect. Second, based on the goals of the HAN projects, the evaluation perspectives are established as (ⅰ) the strengthening of industrial competitiveness, (ⅱ) the enhancement of national scientific and technological capability, (ⅲ) the improvement of quality of life. Third, the evaluation bounds for each evaluation objective are defined to specify the affected area. Finally, the evaluation aspects for each evaluation bounds are formulated containing essential elements describing the evaluation bounds.

• 디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.317-324
• /
• 2012

최근 R&D 투자효율성 제고를 목표로 사업 간의 유사중복 조정에 대한 중요성이 강조되고 있으나, 과제 혹은 예산요구서 내용 등을 텍스트 기반으로 비교하는 기존 유사검색 방식은 내용의 품질 편차 등으로 인해 유의미한 유사성 도출에 제한점이 있다. 이러한 텍스트 기반의 키워드 추출을 통한 유사검색 한계성을 극복하기 위한 방안으로 본 연구에서는 사업 간 유사도 분석 시 과제의 기술분류를 활용한다. 국가R&D사업 조사 분석 시 수집된 과제들의 과학기술표준분류를 추출하여 사업별 고유벡터 모형을 생성 후 이를 이용하여 코사인 기반, 유클리디안 거리기반 알고리즘을 통해 각 사업 간 유사도를 측정하였으며 기존 키워드 추출방식으로 유사도를 측정한 결과와의 비교를 통해 연구 효율성을 검증하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.116-132
• /
• 2023

Technology innovation companies are focusing on contributing to business performance by R&D project as a strategic tool. Successful R&D leads to corporate competitiveness enhancement, national industrial development, but there are high uncertainty and risks in R&D. Public and private R&D projects are carried out to achieve various purposes. It was verified how the risk management and benefit management of the R&D project affect the detailed R&D project performance between the Public and private domain. The impact of Project Leadership on R&D performance was also analyzed. Those who have participated in the Public and Private R&D projects at companies or research institutes were surveyed. First, it was found that project risk and benefit management have partially an effect on R&D project performance. Second, Public and private R&D Project Leadership showed partially a interaction effect between project management and project performance.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.269-283
• /
• 2005

고가의 전문정보 활용이 디지털정보 관리와 서비스에 대한 지속적인 변화에 맞추기 위해서는 학술연구 정보 생산의 중요한 부분을 차지하고 있는 국가단위 R&D 사업 규정에 대한 지속적인 제도 보완이 중요하다. 연구대상으로 선정된 국가단위 R&D 사업 규정은 산자부의 산업기술개발사업운영요령과 정통부의 정보통신 연구개발 관리규정, 그리고 과학기술부의 특정연구개발사업처리규정 등을 중심으로 학술연구 커뮤니케이션을 위한 국가 단위 지식정보자원 활용차원을 중심축으로 조정되어야 할 각 규제의 지재권 관련 내용을 정보생산과 관리, 그리고 서비스 단계별로 세부 분석하였다. 분석 결과로 제안된 내용은 세가지로 기존 규정에 조항은 있으나 미숙하거나 실용성이 부족한 부분을 보완하는 내용과 관련사항에 대해 누락된 조항과 아직까지 전혀 언급되지 못하고 있으나 필요한 신설 조항으로 구성하였다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.237-260
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 정부의 연구개발 사업에 대한 연구 성과의 효율성 검증을 통해 보다 효과적인 예산활용과 연구개발 사업투자에 대한 제언을 하고자 한다. 이를 위해, 국가과학기술연구회에서 주관하는 융합연구사업(창의형융합연구사업, 융합연구단사업)과 일반수탁연구사업의 연구 성과에 대해 '자료포락분석법(Data Envelopment Analysis)'과 'Malmquist Index 분석법'을 활용하여 효율성을 분석하였다. 분석대상은 국가과학기술연구회 주관 융합연구사업(창의형융합연구사업, 융합연구단사업)과 정부 출연연구소들의 일반수탁 연구사업을 대상으로 진행하였으며, DEA를 활용하여 정태적 분석과 Malmquist Index 분석법을 활용하여 동태적 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과 DEA의 정태적인 관점에서 융합연구사업이 높은 효율성을 나타났다. Malmquist Index 분석법을 통한 동태적 관점에서는 일반수탁사업의 효율성이 점차 하향하는 반면, 융합연구사업은 매년 효율성이 향상되었다. 이는 융합연구가 일반연구보다 높은 성과를 가지는 것을 시사한다. 본 연구결과를 통해 정부 R&D투자에 대한 성과평가의 객관적인 기준을 제시하고 정부 출연 연구기관에 대한 효율성 향상을 위한 연구 인력과 연구비의 합리적인 투자정책 및 연구과제기획에 객관적인 시사점을 제공 하고자 한다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.119-125
• /
• 2017

In this paper, we propose an approach to evaluating the performance of the national R&D investment in IT(Information Technology) areas in terms of paper, patent and commercialization, and seeking ways to improve the efficiency of the national R&D investment. This is because the government has focused the national R&D investment on IT areas for some time. For that purpose, we gather data on investments, papers, patents, and commercializations for the government sponsored R&D projects in IT areas through National Science & Technology Information Service. From which, we summarize the investment and performance in terms of papers, patents, and commercializations for each IT area, evaluate efficiency per R&D investment for each IT area, and compare the efficiencies among IT areas. Finally, we drive implications for efficiency enhancement and strategic R&D budget allocation for each IT area.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권9호
• /
• pp.323-329
• /
• 2020

현재 중소기업의 기술혁신을 촉진하기 위해 일정 비율 이상을 중소기업에 의무적으로 지원하도록 제도화하고 있다. 이에 따라 매년 3조원 이상의 정부 예산이 투입되는 중소기업 R&D 사업의 성공 가능성 여부를 판단하기 위하여 전문가의 기술적인 평가를 통해 해당 기술의 기술적 난이도에 대한 상용화 및 성공 가능성을 면밀히 검토하게 된다. 이를 검토하기 위한 방법으로 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법은 평가 항목에 대한 평가 기준을 객관적으로 판단할 수 없었으며, 해당 평가 기준이 모호성 및 불확실성이 내포되어 있어 중소기업 R&D 사업의 전문성 및 공정성을 확보할 수 없었다. 본 연구에서는 중소기업 R&D 사업의 성공 가능성을 판단할 수 있도록 평가 항목에 대한 가중치를 객관적으로 제시할 수 있는 Fuzzy-AHP 기반 중소기업 R&D 평가 시스템을 제안하였다. 삼각 퍼지 수를 이용하여 해당평가 기준을 구간 값으로 적용하여 객관화하였으며, 중소기업 기술개발 지원사업 관리지침에 따른 가중치를 배정하여 실제 평가에 반영될 수 있도록 이를 적용하였다. 본 연구를 통해 새로운 사업에 대한 전문가를 위촉하였을 때 위의 평가항목의 배점 가중치를 재반영할 수 있으며, 이를 이용하여 중소기업 R&D 사업의 전문성 및 공정성을 확보할 수 있을 것이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2021

Military aircraft R&D projects require large-scale investment in cost and time, and involve a complex coordination process in decision-making. The R&D project manager should determine the development management priorities as accurately as possible and focus on R&D capabilities, thereby reducing the risks of the aircraft R&D project. To this end, this study aims to reduce R&D risk by prioritizing cost, schedule, and performance, which are basic management factors used in R&D project management in defense project management regulations. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied using a questionnaire for managers in charge of aviation R&D under the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. As a primary result, the importance of the factors that the aircraft R&D project manager should consider was derived in the order of performance, cost, and schedule, and the priorities of performance and cost in the lower layer were also identified. In addition, in order to provide practical risk management measures to aircraft R&D project managers, the results of analyzing 28 cases of US National Transportation Safety Board accidents were compared and analyzed with the AHP analysis results, and management measures suitable for the situation were specified.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.342-362
• /
• 2022

The national R&D project is a major strategy for the development of science and technology in the country. This is promoted for the purpose of improving the welfare of the people, such as creating jobs and fostering small and medium-sized enterprises, through the results of science and technology research conducted with support from the national budget. Therefore, analysis of the performance evaluation and budgeting system of the current national R&D project is one of the essential parts of preparing a system improvement plan. This study derived improvement plans through a comparative analysis of national R&D project performance evaluation and budget systems in Korea and leading countries such as the United States and Japan. As a result, it was confirmed that it may be difficult to derive innovative research results due to the lack of sustainability and a short period of time to require quantitative performance. To overcome these difficulties, the need for system improvement as follows was suggested. First, it is necessary to enlarge and prolong national R&D projects. Second, a plan for securing sustainability is needed in consideration of the main characteristics of each research field. Finally, it is necessary to strengthen the linkage between organizations in charge of national R&D projects. And also, there is a need for a system that can continuously identify problems and improve the system. In addition, the constitutional amendment will be necessary to separate science and technology from economic development, which states that Article 127, Paragraph 1, "Science and technology should be subordinated to economic development," which is the science and technology article of the current constitution.

• 한국해양공학회지
• /
• 제34권6호
• /
• pp.461-468
• /
• 2020

This study examined how national research and development (R&D) in the domain of logistics has changed recently in the Republic of Korea. We conducted basic statistical analysis and social network analysis on 5,327 logistics-related R&D projects undertaken during 2005-2019. Data for performing these analyses were collected from the R&D database of the National Science and Technology Information Service (NTIS). By constructing a co-occurrence matrix with keywords, we conducted degree and betweenness centrality analysis and visualized the network matrix to display a cluster map. This study presents our observations related to the following findings: (1) the chronical trends of logistics R&D, (2) focused fields of logistics R&D, (3) the relations among keywords, and (4) the characteristics of logistics R&D. Finally, we suggest policy implications to boost and diversify logistics R&D.