• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.15-23
• /
• 2012

Two government affiliated research institutes, EDUMAC and AURI, are developing some tools for an user participating design process in public recently. The tools are originated from DQI/DQIfS, launched in 2002 by CIC(Construction Industry Council) in U.K.. At the beginning DQI/DQIfS was not a tool for making a decision but for a communication between layman and experts of architectural process. Because of this intent the most crucial thing is not DQI/DQIfS itself but how to use the tool: CIC is trying to develop various ways of facilitation. Domestic situation is no exception. Without a proper tool there were an independent user participating process in 2001 and it must have been the first participating process in architectural discourse. Through the seven workshops, the users of Namhansan elementary school drew not only the vision of the school but also concrete requirements which have been continuously adopted so far. The aims of this paper to analyse two facilitation processes: DQI/DQIfS in U.K. and the case of Namhansan process. Even not a proper tools for the process there was a spontaneous facilitation in Namhansan process. When we make a comparison between the Namhansan process and the DQI/DQIfS process there are considerable similarities in terms not only of the process itself but also the results. It shows that there are possibilities to make a Korean facilitation in a user participating process and this study must be the first step.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.43-53
• /
• 2014

In order to communicate each other we need both a system and contexts. Generally a system is called language and contexts are a common sense with a culture. If there is an absence of one of them it is impossible to understand each other. The concept of UPDP(User participating Design Process) is very similar to a communication. There must need both a system(formal tools) and a process to make consensus. Even though we already have two systems(KEBDI and PDAT) being developed by government affiliated research institutes these have not intimately related to a process to make consensus so far. In this respect the UPDP with using DQIfS of U.K. for a remodelling of Noryangjin elementary school(2013) is the most valuable because it is the first trying to communicate between laymen and professionals by menas both of a qualified system and of facilitations which have been developed from Namhansan UPDP(2001) in korea. The paper shows the process of UPDP including how to organise the members, detailed facilitation methods and the result of DQIfS analysis in U.K. Above all for the successful result the most important thing is the intimate relationship between the tool and facilitations at the beginning and user's will to build up.

• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.559-575
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 2010년 세계문화유산 잠정목록에 등록된 국가사적 제57호 남한산성을 대상으로 과거 문헌자료와 현장조사를 통해 식생구조 변화를 밝히고 역사 문화적 가치가 높은 남한산성의 식생복원을 위한 관리방안을 수립하고자 실시하였다. 남한산성 식생의 비오톱 분석 결과 대상지 면적 $2,611,823m^2$ 중 참나무류림이 40.8%이었고, 천이 가능성이 높은 소나무림이 16.5%로 청량산 일원과 서문에서 북문 일원, 남문에서 청량산 사이의 산 능선에 분포하고 있었다. 천이 가능성이 낮은 소나무림은 4.7%로 남한산초등학교 뒤 산림에 주로 분포하고 있었고, 천이가 진행중인 소나무림은 2.9%, 도태중인 소나무림은 2.1%였다. 19년간 식생구조 변화 분석 결과 소나무림${\rightarrow}$소나무 및 참나무류 혼효림${\rightarrow}$참나무류림${\rightarrow}$서어나무림으로 천이가 예측되었고, 시간이 경과함에 따라 참나무류의 세력이 확대되었다. 남한산성 소나무림의 식생 관리방안은 식생구조 특성을 고려하여 관리권역을 구분하였고, 관리권역은 소나무림 경관유지지역 $553,508m^2$, 소나무림 경관복원지역 $114,293m^2$, 적극적 관리지역 $205,306m^2$, 자연천이 유도지역 $1,169,973m^2$이었다.