• 한국소음진동공학회논문집
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.205-212
• /
• 2014

이 연구에서 현대자동차의 단순실험모델(HSM)에 대한 썬루프 버페팅에 대한 수치해석이 수행되었다. 검증을 위하여 HSM 목부위의 경계층에 대한 속도분포 해석결과를 실험결과와 비교하였다. 썬루프 해석은 두 단계로 이루어졌다. 첫 번째로 난류 RANS 모델을 이용하여 정상상태 해석이 수행되었으며, 해석결과는 CAA++의 입력값으로 사용된다. 두 번째 단계는 유동속도에 대한 1차 최대 압력피크와 버페팅 주파수 해석을 위한 비정상상태 해석이 CAA++에서 이루어졌다. 주파수와 음향압력의 수치해석 결과는 타당한 물리적 현상을 보여주고 있으며, 현대 자동차의 실험결과와 잘 일치하는 결과를 보여주었다.

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2013년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.291-291
• /
• 2013

The interior vehicle noise due to the exterior aerodynamic field is an important topic in the acoustic design of a car. The air flow detached from the A-pillar and impacting the side windows are of particular interest as they are located close to the driver / passenger and provides a lower insulation index than the trimmed car body parts. HMC is interested in the numerical prediction of this aerodynamic noise generated by the car windows with the final objective of improving the products design and reducing this noise. The methodology proposed in this paper relies on two steps: the first step involves the computation of the exterior flow and turbulence induced non-linear acoustic field using the CAA(Computational aeroacoustics) solver CAA++. The second step consists in the computation of the vibro-acoustic transmission through the side window using the finite element vibro-acoustic solver Actran. The internal air cavity including trim component are included in the simulation. In order to validate the numerical process, an experimental set-up has been created based on a generic car shape. The car body includes the windshield and two side windows. The body is made of aluminum and trimmed with porous layers. First, this paper describes the method including the CAA and the vibro-acoustic models, from the boundary conditions to the different components involved, like the windows, the trims and the car cavity is detailed. In a second step, the experimental set-up is described. In the last part, the vibration of the windshield and windows, the total wind noise level results and the relative contributions of the different windows are then presented and compared to measurements. The influence of the flow yaw angle (different wind orientation) is also assessed.